View Full Version : Exclusive: Security officials on the ground in Libya challenge CIA account
11-03-2012, 10:30 PM
i keep posting the awful truth. you just see no ,evil hear no evil but your reaction is very enjoyable to me watch you go into but bush did that in iraq so this is justifiable mode . i guess we was supposed to do nothing in iraq like i dunno after get rid of Saddam help create a stable government that wouldn't go making trouble.
too bad the government isnt very strong to crack down on terrorist bombings .
11-03-2012, 10:33 PM
the more you react the more ill post simple fact of nature. if you dont like it either ignore me or deal with it i really dont care or present you case sorta like court.
i present my side you present yours
11-04-2012, 05:02 AM
Most of the liberal media know this looks really bad for Obama, so they will pull the usual and barely report it. I think they wrote more stories about Palin's kids than they have on this story, but they're not biased though.
L.A. BRONCOS FAN
11-04-2012, 05:30 AM
Fox and its mental midgets vs. reality...
CIA documents have now been released that support Susan Rice’s description of Benghazi attacks
The Republican party has been attacking President Obama and calling for the resignation of U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice for having called the attack on Benghazi a spontaneous reaction to anger over the anti-Mohammed documentary that was purported to cause all of this fervor. They continued to call this a terrorist attack or “attack of terror” as President Obama referred to it the day after it occurred. But – any potential confusion about the cause of this attack can be directly attributed to the CIA’s own talking points for Ambassador Rice.
The Washington Post explains these documents HERE (http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/benghazi-attack-becomes-political-ammunition/2012/10/19/e1ad82ae-1a2d-11e2-bd10-5ff056538b7c_story.html):“Talking points” prepared by the CIA on Sept. 15, the same day that Rice taped three television appearances, support her description of the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. Consulate as a reaction to Arab anger about an anti-Muslim video prepared in the United States. According to the CIA account, “The currently available information suggests that the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the U.S. Consulate and subsequently its annex. There are indications that extremists participated in the violent demonstrations.”
The CIA document went on: “This assessment may change as additional information is collected and analyzed and as currently available information continues to be evaluated.” This may sound like self-protective boilerplate, but it reflects the analysts’ genuine problem interpreting fragments of intercepted conversation, video surveillance and source reports.
The senior intelligence official said the analysts’ judgment was based in part on monitoring of some of the Benghazi attackers, which showed they had been watching the Cairo protests live on television and talking about them before they assaulted the consulate.
What we do know is the Republican party has been trying very, very hard to politicize the deaths of 4 Americans civil servants who died during this attack on the American embassy in Benghazi, Libya. Not only have they endangered American lives and intelligence sources with this politicization … they have endangered America’s ability to deal with future intelligence sources as there could be an erosion of trust in America’s ability to maintain confidentiality at all times.
Darrell Issa should resign from his position as Chairman of the House Oversight Committee; he has shown that he is not interested in doing anything more than using his position of power as a cudgel to browbeat his political opponents. He is not worthy of serving in elected office.
Senator John Kerry (D-MA) has released a statement regarding Darrell Issa’s major screwup HERE (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/20/john-kerry-darrell-issa-_n_1992826.html); an excerpt:The wholesale release of State Department documents by the House Oversight Committee has exposed Libyan nationals working with the United States to possible danger. This is irresponsible and inexcusable, and perhaps worst of all it was entirely avoidable. It is profoundly against America’s interests in a difficult region.
11-04-2012, 06:35 AM
CIA says CIA did nothing wrong. "Case closed" says Labron. "Nothing to see here."
"Now if this were the Bush CIA you might have something."
11-04-2012, 12:03 PM
move along nothing to see here
11-12-2012, 03:40 PM
Was the Libya attack aimed at a secret CIA prison?
11-12-2012, 04:10 PM
Was the Libya attack aimed at a secret CIA prison?
interesting but you know it will be swept under the rug dismissed or the source discredited or blackmailed to shut up or paid to be quiet.
maybe im wrong but well this administration is sorta shady.
also why can Clinton get away with affair but no one else.
Bill didnt step down why should Petraeus .
hell why dont they legalize multiple partners in DC.