Racism at Democratic National Convention

[ant1999e]

PHOTO ID REQUIRED TO ENTERHilarious!

Posted on September 3, 2012 by Kevin DuJan // Breaking News, Featured Content
Dear Readers,

In the four years I’ve been running this site I have never seen such a clear and obvious act of RACISM as this.

Please find a way to contact Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Henry Gates, Spike Lee, and Eric Holder.

We need the combined powers of all the Justice Brothers on this one. The entire Justice Family. It is the biggest act of racism in our lifetime.

The Democrats are requiring PHOTO ID to enter their convention in Charlotte!

PHOTO IDs because they are requiring people to prove they are who they say they are in order to engage in protected activity.

According to all of the Democrats who attack Photo ID requirements for voting, it’s racist to ask someone to produce a photo ID to prove who they are, and yet the racists in the Democrat Party are doing just that!

This is an outrage that must be corrected!

Quick, someone on top of a tall building fire up the Justice Brothers Signal and let’s get these ridiculous racial hucksters stalwart opponents of Photo IDs on the case!



Read more http://hillbuzz.org/racism-at-the-democrats-convention-photo-id-required-to-enter-94793

[Pony Boy]

The Liberal-loons love to demonize the large greedy banks, so isn't it ironic that President Obama is going to accept his party's nomination and deliver a speech in the "Bank of America Stadium"……..Hilarious!

[Blart]

cool false equivalence bro

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

cool false equivalence bro

L0L!

I've never seen such desperation from the right-wing brain trust.

Well, I guess the idea of running on their party's record of accomplishments and/or their candidates' merits is out.

[ant1999e]

cool false equivalence bro

I think you confuse false equivalence with hypocrisy.

[Jetmeck]

I think you confuse false equivalence with hypocrisy.

THEN YOU SHOULD UNDERSTAND HIM QUITE WELL...............

[DenverBrit]

This is why we are still in a mess. Partisan sniping for no purpose.

If the supporters of both parties won't change their stance, why should we expect anything different from the parties themselves??

We all face real issues that won't be fixed until 'country first' becomes the mantra and the new agenda.

[Mecklomaniac]

cool false equivalence bro


So...

I need ID to attend DNC
I need ID to get into the union hall to vote in union election
I need ID to get on a plane
I need ID to drive
I need ID to get a library card
I need ID to buy Alcohol, tobacco or firearms.
I need ID to use a credit card
I need ID to get a mortgage.
I need ID to get into government buildings

But to vote as AG Eric Holder....No ID required.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/P5p70YbRiPw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[Jetmeck]

This is why we are still in a mess. Partisan sniping for no purpose.

If the supporters of both parties won't change their stance, why should we expect anything different from the parties themselves??

We all face real issues that won't be fixed until 'country first' becomes the mantra and the new agenda.

We all know who screwed it up and who obstructed cleaning up their own mess.

Yes republicans are party before country............not my opinion...their actions tell it all.

[Jetmeck]

[QUOTE=Mecklomaniac;3655691]So...

I need ID to attend DNC
I need ID to get into the union hall to vote in union election
I need ID to get on a plane
I need ID to drive
I need ID to get a library card
I need ID to buy Alcohol, tobacco or firearms.
I need ID to use a credit card
I need ID to get a mortgage.
I need ID to get into government buildings

But to vote as AG Eric Holder....No ID required.





See folks this is why I get so pissed off. There has been no voter fraud.........hell even Penn or Ohio don't remember which when challenged in court stated there was no voter fraud.

Yet we have seen video of republican lead legislatures enacting these laws and then stating it was to let Romney win their state.

On top of this every voter fraud law that has been enacted was in a republican lead state.

These poor inner city people should be denied a vote because they don't have the money to pay for the documents to get their IDs.

It is either that or eat, what would you choose ? and many have no cars making that more difficult to get the ID.

Should not have to pay to vote.


When you show me actual voter fraud when is non existent then you got something to make a point about.

No voter fraud and republicans saying out loud it was to win the election.............onbly republican legislatures doing this in SWING states.

I ask you all what is terribly difficult about this to comprehend.

This is why I can't stand these tools.................

[houghtam]

False equivalence is false.

I need ID to do X =/= I need ID to vote.

Dumb poster is dumb.

[Mecklomaniac]

But there is no evidence of Republicans fraudulently entering the DNC.... Why the ID??

[ant1999e]

We all know who screwed it up and who obstructed cleaning up their own mess.

Yes republicans are party before country............not my opinion...their actions tell it all.

I think you completely missed his point.

[Jetmeck]

But there is no evidence of Republicans fraudulently entering the DNC.... Why the ID??


I'm sorry is there a law stating you have the right to go this convention cause by golly there happens to be such a law/right which pertains to having the right to vote.............

got it

[ant1999e]

This is why we are still in a mess. Partisan sniping for no purpose.

If the supporters of both parties won't change their stance, why should we expect anything different from the parties themselves??

We all face real issues that won't be fixed until 'country first' becomes the mantra and the new agenda.

You're right but it is pretty funny.

[Jetmeck]

You're right but it is pretty funny.

It's not funny, it is frightening.

As men we are supposed to take ownership of our mistakes and learn from them.

This house blocked anything that would help.

Party before country is treasonous and they said it out loud and their actions proved it.

I cannot tell you all would be fine right now if they would have went along but we will never know. 12% approval rating is lowest in history.

We need to grow the middle class and we are the majority.

Repeating policies that failed RECENTLY is not learning from our mistakes.

Not telling you Obama is perfect but there is a stark difference between his policies that help middle class and poor and Romney's
policies that are aimed at the rich.

[El Minion]

The Fail is strong with this one! Does the 15th amendment protect the right to attend a political convention? How about the Equal Protection Clause? This is why as a country we can't move forward, we have partisanship running on full retard strength, the OP proves that! :oyvey:

[cutthemdown]

Not to mention at convention tonight they did a huge tribute to their icon, Ted Kennedy. You know the one they decided to make an icon after he killed a young woman in a drunken crash, then decided to wait hours and hours to report it. You know, to sober up.

Yeah the party of values.

[Jetmeck]

I think you completely missed his point.




It's not funny, it is frightening.

As men we are supposed to take ownership of our mistakes and learn from them.

This house blocked anything that would help.

Party before country is treasonous and they said it out loud and their actions proved it.

I cannot tell you all would be fine right now if they would have went along but we will never know. 12% approval rating is lowest in history.

We need to grow the middle class and we are the majority.

Repeating policies that failed RECENTLY is not learning from our mistakes.

Not telling you Obama is perfect but there is a stark difference between his policies that help middle class and poor and Romney's
policies that are aimed at the rich.

[ant1999e]

It's not funny, it is frightening.

As men we are supposed to take ownership of our mistakes and learn from them.

This house blocked anything that would help.

Party before country is treasonous and they said it out loud and their actions proved it.

I cannot tell you all would be fine right now if they would have went along but we will never know. 12% approval rating is lowest in history.

We need to grow the middle class and we are the majority.

Repeating policies that failed RECENTLY is not learning from our mistakes.

Not telling you Obama is perfect but there is a stark difference between his policies that help middle class and poor and Romney's
policies that are aimed at the rich.

Follow along with the conversation you mental patient? You're so unstable and contribute so little that I'm about.to put.you on ignore.

[Jetmeck]

Follow along with the conversation you mental patient? You're so unstable and contribute so little that I'm about.to put.you on ignore.

he clown you are the one that thinks grid lock is funny...................

[ant1999e]

WTF is going on with your double posts Jet? Something fishy.

[TonyR]

.... Why the ID??

Um, maybe for the protection and safety of the POTUS? Isn't it possible that the Secret Service required this? Maybe?

[TonyR]

Not to mention...

LOL It's funny how you used to pretend to be somewhat independent and neutral. Your true colors have been shining through lately.

[Jetmeck]

Um, maybe for the protection and safety of the POTUS? Isn't it possible that the Secret Service required this? Maybe?

that is true and this is tooooooooooooo

I'm sorry is there a law stating you have the right to go this convention cause by golly there happens to be such a law/right which pertains to having the right to vote.............

got it

[Mecklomaniac]

The Fail is strong with this one! Does the 15th amendment protect the right to attend a political convention? How about the Equal Protection Clause? This is why as a country we can't move forward, we have partisanship running on full retard strength, the OP proves that! :oyvey:


Requiring ID to enter a government building doesn't restrict first amendment rights.

Requiring ID to buy a handgun doesn't restrict my 2nd amendment rights.

Requiring ID to buy liquor doesn't restrict my 21st amendment rights

but requiring ID to vote...

[ant1999e]

Um, maybe for the protection and safety of the POTUS? Isn't it possible that the Secret Service required this? Maybe?

I agree with this 100%. We must protect the president but we must also protect the process that selects the president.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Requiring ID to enter a government building doesn't restrict first amendment rights.

Requiring ID to buy a handgun doesn't restrict my 2nd amendment rights.

Requiring ID to buy liquor doesn't restrict my 21st amendment rights

but requiring ID to vote...

Amazing how Rush's minions are incapable of grasping such simple distinctions, isn't it?

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

PHOTO ID REQUIRED TO ENTER

Jeez, what are they going to do next?

Require a loyalty oath to the party just to get in?



Oh wait........that was you guys.

[cutthemdown]

LOL It's funny how you used to pretend to be somewhat independent and neutral. Your true colors have been shining through lately.

My true colors are red, white, blue, orange, and green. What are yours?

[cutthemdown]

LOL It's funny how you used to pretend to be somewhat independent and neutral. Your true colors have been shining through lately.

When LABF compares Bush to Hitler do you ever quote him and disagree? If not then don't go around pretending to be the middle of the road police. Tell me out of all the policies we have been discussing what view of mine is the most radical? Most of what is going on here is just a slam fest of personalities. We don't talk issues and debate. This whole forum a joke which is why starting wed I only post for football.

But for you to act like this is some sort of actual discussion is laughable. Just take a look at all the threads and tell me its a place to come be neutral.

[Jetmeck]

Requiring ID to enter a government building doesn't restrict first amendment rights.

Requiring ID to buy a handgun doesn't restrict my 2nd amendment rights.

Requiring ID to buy liquor doesn't restrict my 21st amendment rights

but requiring ID to vote...

What part of there is NO...NONE WHATSOEVER.....voting fraud to protect from ?

In Penn or Ohio when state was taken to court by Obama the judge asked for their evidence of voter fraud and they said thay had none whatsoever.

Do you deny that this is partisan as professed on video by the republicans doing it ?

Why is it these laws are only being passed in republican legislatures in states with closely contested elections last time ?

Do you deny this or just gonna claim republican allegiance and act like the whole world made the above **** up ?

[houghtam]

In Penn or Ohio when state was taken to court by Obama the judge asked for their evidence of voter fraud and they said thay had none whatsoever.

They didn't just say none whatsoever.

They said the 10 (yes, 10! out of tens of millions of votes cast over a 12 year period) reported instances of voter fraud would not have been prevented by Voter ID laws.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

When LABF compares Bush to Hitler do you ever quote him and disagree? If not then don't go around pretending to be the middle of the road police.

When I (or anyone) compares Bush to Hitler, do you ever try the refute the facts used to establish the comparison?

Nope.

You simply attack and smear the messenger - just like you're doing now.

News flash: If there are similarities between Bush and Hitler, then those similarities exist no matter who points them out. Whether the person citing the similarities is "middle of the road" or not is irrelevant.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

My true colors are red, white, blue,...

Not even close.

Your colors are the colors of the flag where the wealthy oligarchs you worship are hiding the ill-gotten loot any given year.

Bush and the republicans destroyed America, and you supported them every inch of the way.

[El Minion]

Requiring ID to enter a government building doesn't restrict first amendment rights.

Requiring ID to buy a handgun doesn't restrict my 2nd amendment rights.

Requiring ID to buy liquor doesn't restrict my 21st amendment rights

but requiring ID to vote...

Exercising your 1st amendment doesn't require an ID, where you want too may because of property and trespassing laws. Buying liquor or a gun is a commercial transaction between private parties, voting is participating in a democratic election with your government. Is right to counsel going to be denied because of lack of ID? How was voting done in the 1800's, 1900's and the early part of the 20th century when no state issued ID existed? Requiring an ID to vote is nothing more than an updated poll tax from the Jim Crow era to disenfranchise voters. Still a Fail for incorrectly conflating separate issues.

[TonyR]

When LABF...

I'm not aware that LABF has ever pretended to be a centrist or an independent. If he has I missed it.

[Requiem]

I for one like the images L.A. posts. I have never been able to read. The charts, graphs and pictures help out a lot. I wish they came in braille.

[barryr]

Apparently the DNC was prepared to keep "God" out of their convention platform for fear of alienating the atheists in their party and also not mentioning Jerusalem as the capital of Israel for fear of alienating the anti-semites of their party. But after getting hammered by the conservative press for that, they are now deciding to include those now, which got boos from delegates when it was announced. Yes, a party to be proud of.

[Requiem]

And here comes barryr!

http://phagclan.webs.com/Retard.jpg

[DenverBrit]

Apparently the DNC was prepared to keep "God" out of their convention platform for fear of alienating the atheists in their party and also not mentioning Jerusalem as the capital of Israel for fear of alienating the anti-semites of their party. But after getting hammered by the conservative press for that, they are now deciding to include those now, which got boos from delegates when it was announced. Yes, a party to be proud of.


Where were you when the RNC excluded the troops at war?? Hypocrite!

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Where were you when the RNC excluded the troops at war?? Hypocrite!

Or when they excluded their standard bearer/last president?

Ha!

[houghtam]

Oh, you silly fools. The DNC didn't leave out God. He's the keynote speaker tonight.

[Irish Stout]

Going to a convention is not a protected activity.

[barryr]

And here comes barryr!

http://phagclan.webs.com/Retard.jpg

The use of an image of a retarded child to try to insult someone is about as low as one can get and I find it disgusting. Only liberals do such things.

[Missouribronc]

Um, maybe for the protection and safety of the POTUS? Isn't it possible that the Secret Service required this? Maybe?

Interesting post.

Important: protecting the President.

Not important: Making sure you need an ID to vote for President.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

The use of an image of a retarded child to try to insult someone is about as low as one can get and I find it disgusting. Only liberals do such things.

He wasn't trying to insult you.

He was just trying to explain you to anyone who happened to be scratching his head after reading this thread. :welcome:

[Missouribronc]

I find it beyond hilarious that proving who you are is such a chore. It should be a bi-partisan movement.

[Missouribronc]

If you can't get an ID, or something to prove who you are and that you can legally vote, you're borderline retarded.

It's that easy.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Interesting post.

Important: protecting the President.

Not important: Making the requirements for an ID to vote for President as hard as possible for seniors, minorities, and poor people - all under the guise of preventing some non-existent fraud.

Fixed. :welcome:

[Missouribronc]

Fixed. :welcome:

I laugh every time I read that people think there shouldn't be requirements to prove you can legally vote.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

I laugh every time I read that people think there shouldn't be requirements to prove you can legally vote.

You enjoy laughing at straw men you create?

(Or, more accurately, that Fox News creates?)

What a surprise! ::)

[houghtam]

I laugh every time I read that people think there shouldn't be requirements to prove you can legally vote.

You've never known poverty.

You should actually feel ashamed for your lack of empathy.

However, you laugh, because you are insecure and childish.

Good for you. Stay in Missouri, please. You fit in.

[Requiem]

Put me out of my Missouri!

[barryr]

A democrat Chairman in Florida says Christians want Jews to die. The demos have a lot of idiots.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/anti-christian-hate-speech-spews-from-the-palm-beach-democratic-chair/

[BroncoBeavis]

The Fail is strong with this one! Does the 15th amendment protect the right to attend a political convention? How about the Equal Protection Clause? This is why as a country we can't move forward, we have partisanship running on full retard strength, the OP proves that! :oyvey:

So what you're saying is photo id should never ever be required for buying a firearm. Might as well pinch a big fat deuce on the bill of rights. LOL

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

A democrat Chairman in Florida says Christians want Jews to die....]

...and then Tinker Bell's light went out. Ha!

[BroncoBeavis]

What part of there is NO...NONE WHATSOEVER.....voting fraud to protect from ?

In Penn or Ohio when state was taken to court by Obama the judge asked for their evidence of voter fraud and they said thay had none whatsoever.

Do you deny that this is partisan as professed on video by the republicans doing it ?

Why is it these laws are only being passed in republican legislatures in states with closely contested elections last time ?

Do you deny this or just gonna claim republican allegiance and act like the whole world made the above **** up ?

You may as well be saying "There are hardly any known arrests for a law we don't enforce. Therefore we shouldn't enforce it."

360 degrees of logic.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

You may as well be saying "There are hardly any known arrests for a law we don't enforce. Therefore we shouldn't enforce it."

360 degrees of logic.

Bzzzzzzzzt!

Incorrect answer.

No one says a law shouldn't be enforced - simply that your party's proposed methods of enforcement are disproportionate to the actual "threat" and do more harm than good.

Sort of like your hero's "war on terra." :welcome:

[Smiling Assassin27]

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-uZ3LLY3vgXA/UEfv72o68cI/AAAAAAAAIe0/hDMMzvP4YYQ/s1600/button.JPG

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

^

No surprise that Grand_Dragon27 would consider this some sort of indictment.

[Missouribronc]

You've never known poverty.

You should actually feel ashamed for your lack of empathy.

However, you laugh, because you are insecure and childish.

Good for you. Stay in Missouri, please. You fit in.

Poverty doesn't mean you can't prove who you are.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Poverty doesn't mean you can't prove who you are.

You still don't understand the issue.

Either that, or you're just playing dumb.

[Missouribronc]

You still don't understand the issue.

Either that, or you're just playing dumb.

It's a pretty simple issue to understand.

The argument against making people prove who they are is that poor people can't do so.

That's an excuse.

[Missouribronc]

What part of there is NO...NONE WHATSOEVER.....voting fraud to protect from ?

In Penn or Ohio when state was taken to court by Obama the judge asked for their evidence of voter fraud and they said thay had none whatsoever.

Do you deny that this is partisan as professed on video by the republicans doing it ?

Why is it these laws are only being passed in republican legislatures in states with closely contested elections last time ?

Do you deny this or just gonna claim republican allegiance and act like the whole world made the above **** up ?

So, if voter fraud isn't a problem, then people shouldn't have a problem proving who they are.

[ant1999e]

What if we gave away free ID's?

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

It's a pretty simple issue to understand.

The argument against making people prove who they are is that poor people can't do so.

That's an excuse.

It's not a matter of simply asking people to "prove who they are."

It's an attempt to create a new form of voter ID that can only be obtained by providing documents many people can't afford to obtain or that were never issued to them in the first place.

This has been explained ad infinitum, but apparently the distinction is too subtle for you.

http://www.bartcop.com/romney-lies-mass_n.jpg

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

What if we gave away free ID's?

How much would that cost the taxpayers?

And how would you justify such an expenditure targeting a "problem" that doesn't even exist?

[Missouribronc]

It's not a matter of simply asking people to "prove who they are."

It's an attempt to create a new form of voter ID that can only be obtained by providing documents many people can't afford to obtain or that were never issued to them in the first place.

This has been explained ad infinitum, but apparently the distinction is too subtle for you.

It truly is a shame that we still have to hear these bold faced lies and excuses.

[ant1999e]

How much would that cost the taxpayers?

And how would you justify such an expenditure targeting a "problem" that doesn't even exist?

We care about cost now?

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

We care about cost now?

I asked because I know YOU do. ;)

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

It truly is a shame that we still have to hear these bold faced lies and excuses.

It's a shame that the evidence and the facts have absolutely no effect on you.

http://www.bartcop.com/romney-jesus-landscaper_n.jpg

[gunns]

Not to mention at convention tonight they did a huge tribute to their icon, Ted Kennedy. You know the one they decided to make an icon after he killed a young woman in a drunken crash, then decided to wait hours and hours to report it. You know, to sober up.

Yeah the party of values.

As opposed to the Republican party who announced that Bush cannot be blamed. You know, the one that falsely got us into a war because of his own agenda that killed thousands of our best, who had no plan for the end of the war once that agenda was carried out, who had the lowest jobs creation in the history of this nation that began long before the end of his term and could see the future but let it decline, who began his term with a surplus and ended with a billion dollar deficit not counting the Iraq war billions, as millions of Americans began losing their jobs and homes. The administration who left a mess for Obama to try and fix. You think they did that because that's EXACTLY what millions of American think and know?

But then, you say, it's totally different. Ok, let's go back to that time when that blameless President was getting DUI's and then going AWOL. Did he ever sober up? Hell no they didn't do a huge tribute to him, he didn't even show to the convention. Probably the smartest thing he ever did. Yeah, the party of family values.