Mittens Made Big $$$ From Abortions...

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

This story shatters the Romney lies that he left Bain Capital in 1999 before it bought a controversial company that destroyed fetuses from abortions. SEC filings and public statements from Bain Capital's own attorney clearly show Romney was the sole owner in control of Bain Capital for at least two more years, during which time he raked in millions in profits from Stericycle, a company in legal troubles for exposing workers to harmful diseases. The new timeline contradicts the Romney campaign lies meant to cover up his association with this firm targeted by anti-abortion activists. It also shows Romney had no problem compromising his personal beliefs that "human life begins at conception" in owning and profiting in the destruction of aborted fetuses. David Corn's story is ground breaking and must be read. Know these facts to counter the forthcoming Republican spin on this important news which threatens Mitt's presidential chances.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/07/romney-bain-abortion-stericycle-sec

https://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/291545_3671200613381_443982221_o.jpg

[Arkie]

That was in 1999 before he changed his beliefs. He was still pro-choice, and he endorsed the abortion pill three years later.

[TonyR]

So I guess the only difference between Romney and Obama on abortion is that Obama is honest about his position on the issue and hasn't changed it for politically motivated reasons. Oh, and he never profited from them in any way, either...

[cutthemdown]

Who cares Obama flop flops as well. Marriage was reserved for a man and woman when he ran the first time.

[barryr]

Hmm, so Obama hasn't changed his stance on anything? Sure. Obama took money from Bain and companies that do business with Bain, so bringing Bain up is not a winner for Obama.

[gunns]

Hmm, so Obama hasn't changed his stance on anything? Sure. Obama took money from Bain and companies that do business with Bain, so bringing Bain up is not a winner for Obama.

Really? Link? Or are you referring to the Obama campaign taking money from Bain Capital employees who paid for those bashing ads?

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Who cares Obama flop flops as well. Marriage was reserved for a man and woman when he ran the first time.

Translation: "A GOP presidential candidate can violate every principle righties profess to stand for, and they'll still vote for him."

[cutthemdown]

I'm actually pro choice but don't want tax dollars paying for abortions. Not every Republican really sees abortion as a huge issue. It's mostly the religious faction of the party who pushes that issue.

I vote Republican because I don't think the federal govt is good at running my life. I don't think we need an agency for every little thing. I believe in letting states decide for themselves.

Just like Romneys healthcare. It was at the state level as it should be.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

>>

I vote Republican because I don't think the federal govt is good at running my life.<<

The government you're attacking is a straw man.

It doesn't exist.

Government has been little more than a proxy for private interests/the highest bidder for quite some time now.

Hence, you should change your complaint to "I don't think private interests (and whoever happens to have the most money) are good at running my life."

[cutthemdown]

The government you're attacking is a straw man.

It doesn't exist.

Government has been little more than a proxy for private interests/the highest bidder for quite some time now.

Hence, you should change your complaint to "I don't think private interests (and whoever happens to have the most money) are good at running my life."

I'll agree with that. The differences in the two parties not as much as we would all like to think. In the end they all are slaves to the same masters. We are probably wasting our time arguing about politics.

[BroncoBeavis]

Translation: "A GOP presidential candidate can violate every principle righties profess to stand for, and they'll still vote for him."

Seems familiar

http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/liberals-ignore-obama-guantanamos-article-1.1106633?localLinksEnabled=false

[BroncoBeavis]

Really? Link? Or are you referring to the Obama campaign taking money from Bain Capital employees who paid for those bashing ads?

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/05/top-obama-donor-tied-to-bain-layoffs/

[barryr]

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/05/top-obama-donor-tied-to-bain-layoffs/

Thank you. The Obama supporters just really can't or won't see the hypocrisy in their messiah. Even his lawyers argued before the SC of Obamacare and a "tax" but they now, like little lapdogs, go with the lawyerism type games BS "penalty" term, so now life makes sense to them. What sheep.

[Requiem]

I closed my eyes and thought to myself, "Ah, maybe barryr will have a response that doesn't generalize liberals or people who support Obama." Guess I was wrong. Hilarious!

[DenverBrit]

I closed my eyes and thought to myself, "Ah, maybe barryr will have a response that doesn't generalize liberals or people who support Obama." Guess I was wrong. Hilarious!

:)
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_nfAC6x9t-_8/Sk-PekciXqI/AAAAAAAACHo/QQr9dKsuQM4/s400/Slave+to+Routine

[Arkie]

The government you're attacking is a straw man.

It doesn't exist.

Government has been little more than a proxy for private interests/the highest bidder for quite some time now.

Hence, you should change your complaint to "I don't think private interests (and whoever happens to have the most money) are good at running my life."

I agree 100%. Government allowed big business to run our lives. The gov picks winners and losers instead of the free market.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

I agree 100%. Government allowed big business to run our lives. The gov picks winners and losers instead of the free market.

No.

Government nowadays is simply a proxy for the "free market."