PDA

View Full Version : BCS possibly heading to playoff system


canadianbroncosfan
06-20-2012, 04:43 PM
There are still plenty of details to be hammered out, but at least one BCS conference commissioner believes he and his colleagues can reach a compromise on the model for a four-team playoff to determine college football's national championship -- possibly as soon as this week.

read more http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/8070330/bcs-conference-commissioner-believes-colleagues-reach-four-team-playoff-model

oubronco
06-20-2012, 05:09 PM
I'll believe it when I see it

SoCalBronco
06-20-2012, 05:23 PM
The debate appears to be top 4 overall or 4 conference champions. Its going to become fairly clear that there is no other choice but top 4 overall. The other method would likely not survive an antitrust challenge under the rule of reason analysis.

Man-Goblin
06-20-2012, 05:53 PM
And I can dig it. Would rather have 8 tho.

Ideally, I think you have 6 conference champions and two wildcards. Or 7 sixteen team conference champions and 1 wildcard. Seeded by whatever the hell fair ranking they can come up with.

GameOver
06-20-2012, 06:05 PM
Yeah I agree it should be 8 but atleast it will be start in the right direction.

SoCalBronco
06-20-2012, 06:08 PM
8 would be great, but I think that's been proposed and shot down as it would extend the season too far. Looks like they are focused on 4, but with 8, you could have the four big time conference champs plus 4 wildcards (so ND, the ACC Champ, the mid-majors and the team that finishes 2nd in the big conferences would all have a good shot to still get in).

elsid13
06-20-2012, 06:49 PM
8 would be great, but I think that's been proposed and shot down as it would extend the season too far. Looks like they are focused on 4, but with 8, you could have the four big time conference champs plus 4 wildcards (so ND, the ACC Champ, the mid-majors and the team that finishes 2nd in the big conferences would all have a good shot to still get in).

I disagree big time. FCA Division does a 16 plus team(include play in teams) playoff and they are done by 7 January every year. There is no reason for Division I team not to have something similar.

SoCalBronco
06-20-2012, 06:55 PM
I disagree big time. FCA Division does a 16 plus team(include play in teams) playoff and they are done by 7 January every year. There is no reason for Division I team not to have something similar.

It would take forever to do a 16 team playoff plus the regular Bowls (I wouldnt mind that, but alot of powers that be do mind it). Make no mistake, you MUST preserve the underlying Bowl system (in addition to whatever playoff system is used), or the 90% of the teams that are never in contention are not going to vote for this system. They have to still feed at the trough or else those University Presidents simply won't vote for it. It's a money issue.

elsid13
06-20-2012, 07:02 PM
It would take forever to do a 16 team playoff plus the regular Bowls (I wouldnt mind that, but alot of powers that be do mind it). Make no mistake, you MUST preserve the underlying Bowl system (in addition to whatever playoff system is used), or the 90% of the teams that are never in contention are not going to vote for this system. They have to still feed at the trough or else those University Presidents simply won't vote for it. It's a money issue.

The team should either be in the playoff systems or bowls not both. Schools will make far more money if they are in the playoff system because its a home game for them.

SoCalBronco
06-20-2012, 07:07 PM
The team should either be in the playoff systems or bowls not both. Schools will make far more money if they are in the playoff system because its a home game for them.

It's not a "should" issue. It's a fiduciary duty issue. Each university President/administration has a fiduciary duty to maximize the possible financial benefit for their university. It's not about should. The President of Boston College is not going to vote for a 4 team, 8 team or 16 team playoff with NO underlying bowl system for the also-ran teams that are perennially somewhere between 6-6 and 8-4, because Boston College (just as an example) is always in that secondary range and NEVER in the top 4-8 (and rarely in the top 16, very rarely). They aren't going to give up money for free.

You can have a 4/8/16 team playoff for the elite teams, thats fine, but everyone else still has to be able to feed at the trough or you don't have the votes to proceed. You have to look at this realistically. If you have an eight team playoff that replaces the four big bowls (or use those same game sites) but leave all the lower bowls in place, thats the only way its going to work. Same for 4 team playoff. Like rotate the title game (say its New Orleans/Sugar one year.....so one Semifinal will be Pasadena/Rose, the other Semifinal was Orange/Miami, and the two highest division champs that didnt get into the 4 team playoff can play in the Fiesta...and preserve all the lower bowls for the other teams so they can vote for it).

BroncoMan4ever
06-20-2012, 09:00 PM
i still think the best course of action is to have each conference champ make the playoffs, use the AP and Coaches polls to determine their seedings and make a true playoff system. 4 team playoff is good in that it gives a more clear cut champion, but now rather than teams bitching about not getting their shot at a National Championship we get to hear teams bitching because they were left out of the 4 team playoff. take away the bitching and moaning and let the conference champs duke it out.

BroncoMan4ever
06-20-2012, 09:06 PM
It's not a "should" issue. It's a fiduciary duty issue. Each university President/administration has a fiduciary duty to maximize the possible financial benefit for their university. It's not about should. The President of Boston College is not going to vote for a 4 team, 8 team or 16 team playoff with NO underlying bowl system for the also-ran teams that are perennially somewhere between 6-6 and 8-4, because Boston College (just as an example) is always in that secondary range and NEVER in the top 4-8 (and rarely in the top 16, very rarely). They aren't going to give up money for free.

You can have a 4/8/16 team playoff for the elite teams, thats fine, but everyone else still has to be able to feed at the trough or you don't have the votes to proceed. You have to look at this realistically. If you have an eight team playoff that replaces the four big bowls (or use those same game sites) but leave all the lower bowls in place, thats the only way its going to work. Same for 4 team playoff. Like rotate the title game (say its New Orleans/Sugar one year.....so one Semifinal will be Pasadena/Rose, the other Semifinal was Orange/Miami, and the two highest division champs that didnt get into the 4 team playoff can play in the Fiesta...and preserve all the lower bowls for the other teams so they can vote for it).

all the bowl games are the problem with the playoff system, but a way to rectify that is for the lesser bowls to become sponsors for conference championship games and playoff games.

that works better for the ****ty bowls no one cares about anyway as they become sponsors for bigger games people may have some interest in.

Jason in LA
06-20-2012, 09:07 PM
College football just doesn't get it. Why can't they just give people what they want? Or do what makes sense. People complained about getting a playoff system, so they gave us the BCS. Fail. People complain some more, and they just add another step by making it 4 teams. That's not good enough either. 8 teams, and play the quarter and semifinal games in mid December before the bowl season. High seed gets a home game, title game on a neutral site. It's that simple.

A 4 team playoff doesn't really solve all the problems, because the non BCS conference teams will still be left out more often than not. If it is top 8 and one of those teams goes undefeated they'll get in. But top 4, more often than not they won't get in. It really seems like the NCAA or who ever is running this thing does not want any non BCS conference teams involved in any of this.

Extending it to 4 teams is better than what we have now, but it still causes a problem because deserving teams will still get left out. If they did top 8, teams 9 and 10 can complain all they want. Who cares? That's like a college basketball team complaining that they got left out of the tournament. They weren't winning it anyways. Top 8 will allow all the real contenders to get in. Top 16 is just too many.

Issues with extending the season is a lame argument. Only two teams will have to play an extra two games. No problem. When Oregon made it a couple years back, they played a total of 13 games, and Auburn 14. Here in California, teams that make the state bowl games play a total of 15 games. And missing class is a lame argument too. Most college football players don't miss class. On road trips, which is only like 5 a year, they leave on a Friday afternoon. What college student is scheduling classes on a Friday afternoon? I'm pretty sure football players are told not to. College basketball players miss class often because a number of their games are mid week. Nobody is making an issue there.

I'd say that using a bowl game as a playoff game is a horrible idea. Bowl games are supposed to be a celebration of the season. One last game. Don't demean that bowl game by making it a playoff game. And many fans travel to bowl games. Are fans going to be expected to travel to the bowl game, and then to a title game? A lot of fans would skip traveling to the bowl game and hope their team makes the title game so they can travel to that. It will hurt the attendance of that bowl game.

Jason in LA
06-20-2012, 09:11 PM
i still think the best course of action is to have each conference champ make the playoffs, use the AP and Coaches polls to determine their seedings and make a true playoff system. 4 team playoff is good in that it gives a more clear cut champion, but now rather than teams b****ing about not getting their shot at a National Championship we get to hear teams b****ing because they were left out of the 4 team playoff. take away the b****ing and moaning and let the conference champs duke it out.

You know, doing that would take out the strength of schedule argument. Teams could schedule tough non conference games and it won't hurt them, because they just need to win their conference. And teams who schedule cupcake non conference schedules will not benefit from that. So would non BCS conference champions be involved? Because if they are, then it solves all the problems.

Jason in LA
06-20-2012, 09:15 PM
all the bowl games are the problem with the playoff system, but a way to rectify that is for the lesser bowls to become sponsors for conference championship games and playoff games.

that works better for the ****ty bowls no one cares about anyway as they become sponsors for bigger games people may have some interest in.

That's the part I don't like. The bowl system has to stay intact, and that is one fear of a playoff system. That it would take away from the bowl system. That is a major reason why there is not a playoff system, so any plan that demeans the bowl system will not work. So just make the playoff games mid December, when all teams are done with the regular season, and it is before the bowl season. Ratings would be huge because there are no meaningful college football games then, and all the ****ty bowl games will still be around.

TheElusiveKyleOrton
06-20-2012, 09:18 PM
all the bowl games are the problem with the playoff system, but a way to rectify that is for the lesser bowls to become sponsors for conference championship games and playoff games.

that works better for the ****ty bowls no one cares about anyway as they become sponsors for bigger games people may have some interest in.

Dude, what are you talking about? The Beef OBradys Bowl was AWESOME last year. :giggle:

Made some serious coin (http://dailydickpunch.com/2011/12/20/bcs-is-better-beef-obradys-bowl/) on that game.

TheElusiveKyleOrton
06-20-2012, 09:20 PM
That's the part I don't like. The bowl system has to stay intact, and that is one fear of a playoff system. That it would take away from the bowl system. That is a major reason why there is not a playoff system, so any plan that demeans the bowl system will not work. So just make the playoff games mid December, when all teams are done with the regular season, and it is before the bowl season. Ratings would be huge because there are no meaningful college football games then, and all the ****ty bowl games will still be around.

Couldn't you have the regular bowls play in prime time during the week, with the playoff games on Saturday afternoon/evening? Why wouldn't that work? The games still get played, get played in prime time, and the games people care about go wall to wall on Saturday.

Seems like everyone wins.

I'm a Montana fan. I've seen the playoffs, they work, and they're GREAT for the University.

DBroncos4life
06-20-2012, 09:34 PM
Couldn't you have the regular bowls play in prime time during the week, with the playoff games on Saturday afternoon/evening? Why wouldn't that work? The games still get played, get played in prime time, and the games people care about go wall to wall on Saturday.

Seems like everyone wins.

I'm a Montana fan. I've seen the playoffs, they work, and they're GREAT for the University.

GO Bobcats!

Jason in LA
06-20-2012, 09:36 PM
Couldn't you have the regular bowls play in prime time during the week, with the playoff games on Saturday afternoon/evening? Why wouldn't that work? The games still get played, get played in prime time, and the games people care about go wall to wall on Saturday.

Seems like everyone wins.

I'm a Montana fan. I've seen the playoffs, they work, and they're GREAT for the University.


Hmmm, that pushes the playoff games into bowl season. I like the idea of having the playoff games before the bowl season so that teams and fans can prepare for what ever bowl game their teams is going to play in.

BroncoMan4ever
06-20-2012, 10:19 PM
You know, doing that would take out the strength of schedule argument. Teams could schedule tough non conference games and it won't hurt them, because they just need to win their conference. And teams who schedule cupcake non conference schedules will not benefit from that. So would non BCS conference champions be involved? Because if they are, then it solves all the problems.

i think every conference, regardless of size or stature in the NCAA should send a conference champ to a playoff system. how the conference champs should be decided should be based on conference record; with strength of schedule, including non conference games settling tie breakers for deciding the 2 teams that play for their conference championship and the playoff slot.

shorten the regular season to 10 games since with a playoff season a team could wind up playing 14 games which is just about how many most teams play under the current system. and with 12 conferences the playoff scheduling could basically mimic the NFL. Bye week for the top 4 teams. also, this could get rid of the month and a half several teams wind up waiting for their bowl game. by doing the season and playoffs without that kind of layoff, the NCAA could get huge viewership by having their National Championship game on New Years Day, a full month ahead of the Super Bowl and without needing to compete against NFL playoffs for viewers.

one would think that college football would see how great a playoff system could be by looking at college basketball. March Madness is insane, and viewership is massive, especially when there is that Cinderella school that makes a run

Navy Broncos Fan
06-20-2012, 10:24 PM
I have always thought 6 conference champs + 2 wild cards. No need to get rid of the bowls, incorporate them as playoff games keep the names and bowl money and add a couple more games. You can keep all of the silly bowls for the other teams but a champion needs to be crowned on the field not at a ballot box.

BroncoMan4ever
06-20-2012, 10:31 PM
I have always thought 6 conference champs + 2 wild cards. No need to get rid of the bowls, incorporate them as playoff games keep the names and bowl money and add a couple more games. You can keep all of the silly bowls for the other teams but a champion needs to be crowned on the field not at a ballot box.

i think the best bowl games Fiesta, Orange, Rose etc should be the names of the playoff games amongst the conference champs in the playoffs. once the playoff teams are set use the polls to set the remaining lesser bowls amongst teams not in the playoffs(also wouldn't hurt to dump some of them either)

have the National Championship game on New Years Day be the end of the college football season

maven
06-20-2012, 10:55 PM
What about the 5th team who is on the outside and looking in? And is probably just as good, if not better than who's rank 3,4. Also, I can see small schools getting X out.

spdirty
06-20-2012, 11:05 PM
They should do 68 teams. Like in basketball.

Jason in LA
06-20-2012, 11:14 PM
i think every conference, regardless of size or stature in the NCAA should send a conference champ to a playoff system. how the conference champs should be decided should be based on conference record; with strength of schedule, including non conference games settling tie breakers for deciding the 2 teams that play for their conference championship and the playoff slot.

shorten the regular season to 10 games since with a playoff season a team could wind up playing 14 games which is just about how many most teams play under the current system. and with 12 conferences the playoff scheduling could basically mimic the NFL. Bye week for the top 4 teams. also, this could get rid of the month and a half several teams wind up waiting for their bowl game. by doing the season and playoffs without that kind of layoff, the NCAA could get huge viewership by having their National Championship game on New Years Day, a full month ahead of the Super Bowl and without needing to compete against NFL playoffs for viewers.

one would think that college football would see how great a playoff system could be by looking at college basketball. March Madness is insane, and viewership is massive, especially when there is that Cinderella school that makes a run

I looked up the conferences, and there are 11. I still think that's too many teams in the playoffs. So take 6 of the conference champs. Go by the rankings to determine which 6 of the 11 conference champs make it to the playoffs, and then you have to at large teams, who will be the highest ranked non conference champs. Mid major teams will have a chance if they win their conference. If they go undefeated they should rank in the top 6 of the conference winners, and they're in. By having two at large teams, if one conference has two of the top five or so teams, both teams will more than likely get in.

I don't think the NCAA would want to cut the season down from 12 to 10 games, especially if it will only be for 8 teams who are in a playoff.

canadianbroncosfan
06-20-2012, 11:15 PM
Looks like it will be presented to schools in the near future. Sounds like it will be four teams and based on the top 4 ranking, that the four major conferences.

"People with firsthand knowledge of the decision tell The Associated Press the semifinals of the proposed plan would rotate among the major bowls and not be tied to traditional conference relationships.

They also said that under the plan a selection committee would choose the schools that play for the national title."



Read more: http://aol.sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/story/2012-06-20/college-football-playoff-four-team-plus-one-sec-big-12-pac-12-big-ten-pac-12#ixzz1yOyOxKsl

Jason in LA
06-20-2012, 11:19 PM
What ever plan they come up with, it will probably be a horrible one. Why is it so simple in every other sport, but only one division in college football can't get it right?

maven
06-20-2012, 11:47 PM
What ever plan they come up with, it will probably be a horrible one. Why is it so simple in every other sport, but only one division in college football can't get it right?

Because it's the only sport I can think of where you can get the school, alumni, and fanbase very excited about participating in The Capital One Down Under Outback Steakhouse buy one shrimp on the barbi, get one free played on some random day in December.

BroncoMan4ever
06-20-2012, 11:51 PM
I looked up the conferences, and there are 11. I still think that's too many teams in the playoffs. So take 6 of the conference champs. Go by the rankings to determine which 6 of the 11 conference champs make it to the playoffs, and then you have to at large teams, who will be the highest ranked non conference champs. Mid major teams will have a chance if they win their conference. If they go undefeated they should rank in the top 6 of the conference winners, and they're in. By having two at large teams, if one conference has two of the top five or so teams, both teams will more than likely get in.

I don't think the NCAA would want to cut the season down from 12 to 10 games, especially if it will only be for 8 teams who are in a playoff.

i didn't pay attention on my first count and counted the Independents like Notre Dame, Navy, Army and BYU as a conference

ZachKC
06-21-2012, 05:01 AM
I'll believe it when I see it

Oh that is done. There is going to be a playoff they are just figuring out what form it takes.

TheChamp24
06-21-2012, 06:48 AM
I don't think you can just go by conference champ.
2008, the top 4 teams were from 2 conferences, OU, Florida, Alabama and Texas.
Last year, you had Alabama, LSU, Oklahoma State in the top 3.

Take the top 4 teams, put them in a playoff.

People complain that college football can't get a playoff system right, but its a lot harder I imagine to plan a playoff system where you play only 1 game a week.

TheElusiveKyleOrton
06-21-2012, 08:00 AM
I don't think you can just go by conference champ.
2008, the top 4 teams were from 2 conferences, OU, Florida, Alabama and Texas.
Last year, you had Alabama, LSU, Oklahoma State in the top 3.

Take the top 4 teams, put them in a playoff.

People complain that college football can't get a playoff system right, but its a lot harder I imagine to plan a playoff system where you play only 1 game a week.

If the conferences have a championship game, you can put the championship winners in the playoff.

BroncoBeavis
06-21-2012, 08:09 AM
I disagree big time. FCA Division does a 16 plus team(include play in teams) playoff and they are done by 7 January every year. There is no reason for Division I team not to have something similar.

Yeah, the way it's formatted there's 5 weeks worth of games in FCS playoffs. I have no idea what the excuse is for not being able to pull off 3 weeks to do 8 teams. Plus then you could accommodate all the major bowls by making them playoff games. Any of the smaller bowls who still want to host can still get the also-rans that didn't make the cut, since those bowls weren't getting top-10 teams anyway.

4 seems completely unworkable.

BroncoInferno
06-21-2012, 08:17 AM
Yeah, the way it's formatted there's 5 weeks worth of games in FCS playoffs. I have no idea what the excuse is for not being able to pull off 3 weeks to do 8 teams. Plus then you could accommodate all the major bowls by making them playoff games. Any of the smaller bowls who still want to host can still get the also-rans that didn't make the cut, since those bowls weren't getting top-10 teams anyway.

4 seems completely unworkable.

This used to be my thought, too, but someone recently pointed out the problem with this thinking. If you accomodated the bowls for the semis and final game, you run into an attendance problem. Who the hell could afford to make travel accomodations two or three weekends in a row to the major cities where the bowls are housed? With the exception of the championship game, if you had a 16 game field you'd have to have a homefield format to make travel reasonable for the fans. So, you can see why the bowls are fighting tooth and nail against such a format. They would be out of the loop.

Garcia Bronco
06-21-2012, 08:18 AM
I am sure no matter what they do, people will find away to complain.

BroncoBeavis
06-21-2012, 08:30 AM
This used to be my thought, too, but someone recently pointed out the problem with this thinking. If you accomodated the bowls for the semis and final game, you run into an attendance problem. Who the hell could afford to make travel accomodations two or three weekends in a row to the major cities where the bowls are housed? With the exception of the championship game, if you had a 16 game field you'd have to have a homefield format to make travel reasonable for the fans. So, you can see why the bowls are fighting tooth and nail against such a format. They would be out of the loop.

Yeah, I see what you're saying. And I'm not saying they all need to be neutral site bowl games. But you couldn't even accommodate the current 4 BCS bowls with a 4 team field. And I bet we overestimate how much current bowl attendance is filled out by traveling college fans. My guess is most of the attendance is still local, unless the bowl happens to be in a team's region. They could maybe make some effort to regionalize the bowls, like giving preference to one conference's top seed (if they survive) to play in a certain bowl.

Myself, I don't really give two ****s about the bowl games themselves. I just don't see this going anywhere unless they figure out how to get the major bowls to buy in.

DivineLegion
06-21-2012, 08:56 AM
Looks like it will be presented to schools in the near future. Sounds like it will be four teams and based on the top 4 ranking, that the four major conferences.

"People with firsthand knowledge of the decision tell The Associated Press the semifinals of the proposed plan would rotate among the major bowls and not be tied to traditional conference relationships.

They also said that under the plan a selection committee would choose the schools that play for the national title."



Read more: http://aol.sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/story/2012-06-20/college-football-playoff-four-team-plus-one-sec-big-12-pac-12-big-ten-pac-12#ixzz1yOyOxKsl

What's the point of a playoff if there is still a selection committee determining the participants. Isn't that the purpose of a playoff? Maybe I read that wrong, and they are referring to the selection of the four schools competing for a national title, if that's the case I agree. If LSU would have played stanford last year, and Alabama would have played OSU I would have been content.

Jason in LA
06-21-2012, 09:10 AM
Seeing that the folks who run college football are so stuck on the bowl system, and not demeaning those games, then why consider any model that uses them as a playoff? Come up with a system where the playoffs do not interfere with the bowls. There is nothing going on in mid December. It's like perfect. It's so perfect that it probably won't even be considered. College football seems to like controversy over getting anything right. Seems like they're like a chick that just loves drama so she sabotages every aspect of life.

BroncoBeavis
06-21-2012, 09:12 AM
Seeing that the folks who run college football are so stuck on the bowl system, and not demeaning those games, then why consider any model that uses them as a playoff? Come up with a system where the playoffs do not interfere with the bowls. There is nothing going on in mid December. It's like perfect. It's so perfect that it probably won't even be considered. College football seems to like controversy over getting anything right. Seems like they're like a chick that just loves drama so she sabotages every aspect of life.

Problem with that approach is that any team heading into a playoff is going to treat any bowl game before that playoff like an NFL preseason game. It would be unwatchable. And nobody would attend, at least not for the prices major bowls are accustomed to.

WolfpackGuy
06-21-2012, 09:18 AM
I think you need at least 8 teams.

They could probably work it if they cut out a regular season game or two so the "student"-athletes won't miss so many classes.

Jason in LA
06-21-2012, 09:19 AM
Problem with that approach is that any team heading into a playoff is going to treat any bowl game before that playoff like an NFL preseason game. It would be unwatchable. And nobody would attend, at least not for the prices major bowls are accustomed to.

The model that I would be in favor of, the playoff games would be before any bowl games. So if USC wins the PAC 12, but loses in either the quarter or semifinals, they would then go to the Rose Bowl. The Rose Bowl wouldn't be played before the playoffs.

BroncoBen
06-21-2012, 09:53 AM
Its a start.. I'm sure if the 4 team format is successful eventually the format will be expanded to more teams.

barryr
06-21-2012, 09:55 AM
If the other divisions of college football can figure out a system that seems to work, then this shouldn't be so hard. But as others have pointed out, the money made in these bowls trumps anything else. But in reality, the lesser bowls, the teams there know they are not playing for a championship, so I don't see how having like the top 8 teams battle it out with the usual top bowl games included for the title while the rest of the bowls go as planned. But I am not holding my breath they will do anything intelligent and do some lame plan that really isn't much and teams complaining they should have been included and will end up going through 2 or more revisions and years until they get something everyone can live with.

BroncoMan4ever
06-21-2012, 12:26 PM
I don't think you can just go by conference champ.
2008, the top 4 teams were from 2 conferences, OU, Florida, Alabama and Texas.
Last year, you had Alabama, LSU, Oklahoma State in the top 3.

Take the top 4 teams, put them in a playoff.

People complain that college football can't get a playoff system right, but its a lot harder I imagine to plan a playoff system where you play only 1 game a week.

i disagree. conference champ into the playoffs makes the college system very good. i mean yes there will be some very good teams who lost their conference who are better than some other weaker conference winner, but that happens every year in the NFL but you move on.

people continue to complain about BCS games from several years before, with a good playoff system, that doesn't happen anymore.

enjolras
06-21-2012, 02:56 PM
It seems simple to me.

Eight team playoff, 6 conference champions + 2 at large.

- SEC Champion
- Pac-12 Champion
- Big-12 Champion
- Big-10 Champion
- ACC Champion
- Big East (I guess) Champion
+2

The first rounds are played at home for the higher ranked team. Sem-finals and championships are played at traditional bowl sites.


*NOTE: Everything below this has no chance of ever happening.

If you want to make this really awesome establish a lower division and dump half of the teams into that and pair them up with a higher-tier conference:

- SEC/Sunbelt
- Pac-12/Mountain West
- Big-12/WAC
- Big-10/Dunno
- ACC/Conference USA
- Big East/some other conference

Then go British soccer relegation on it. The bottom two teams are replaced by the top two teams from the other conference every year. It makes every single absolutely meaningful for lower-end conference teams. It means EVERY team that plays football has a real chance of winning their respective division Championship. Teams (like Boise State) that build really strong programs can emerge from those lower divisions into the upper divisions and actually have the opportunity to compete for a national title.

StugotsIII
06-21-2012, 03:48 PM
They will find a way to screw this up...

BroncoBeavis
06-27-2012, 04:35 PM
http://www.ajc.com/sports/bcs-gets-boot-in-1465286.html

Looks like a go. Sucks it won't be in 2013 though.

ludo21
06-27-2012, 04:37 PM
there will always be a team left out that think they deserve a shot.

4 is a good start, it may move to 8 eventually.

Tombstone RJ
06-27-2012, 04:45 PM
What ever plan they come up with, it will probably be a horrible one. Why is it so simple in every other sport, but only one division in college football can't get it right?

One word: money

The bowl games make the schools money and this is why the idiots are so opposed to going to a system that "may" adversely affect the bowl games.

Garcia Bronco
06-27-2012, 04:58 PM
The Big East is out according to some....so that's 5 major Conferences and Notre Dame.

canadianbroncosfan
06-27-2012, 05:20 PM
http://www.ajc.com/sports/bcs-gets-boot-in-1465286.html

Looks like a go. Sucks it won't be in 2013 though.

I understand the knocks on it however it is improvement to what they have now.

StugotsIII
06-27-2012, 05:36 PM
It's a step in the right direction, but it still has a ton of flaws...

rmsanger
06-27-2012, 06:13 PM
Gotta love people man! Someone makes progress in the right direction and there will be a crowd to bitch and complain that it isn't enough or is too slow. STFU and actually appreciate a little progress...