View Full Version : What are the odds?
What are the odds that the Washington Post would have a full scale hit piece accusing Mitt Romney (as a teenager) of bullying gay classmates, ready for press the very same day President Obama declares he’s the Abe Lincoln for gays? Apparently pretty good because this pathetic piece ran yesterday.
barryr
05-11-2012, 07:51 PM
Which shows the liberal media, as they have done for years, are apart of the democrat party and working together since obviously they had this story for awhile now and were waiting for the chance to publish it. They were hoping closer to the election to do their usual hit piece, but will publish something else they have in October. But that darn Fox News is so biased though.
What are the odds that no matter what Romney does there will always be a "hit piece" out there?
I'd say pretty good because he's a low character man child who doesn't have any convictions of his own.
And FYI, if this was all some orchestrated deal then why did the White House have a "reveal" strategy drawn out that had them announcing it in a couple weeks that just got scuttled by Biden speaking up too soon?
Also, a well corroborated, well investigated, character piece on a presidential candidate is not a "hit piece". It's solid journalism.
ant1999e
05-12-2012, 01:26 AM
But they didn't know Obama was gonna declare his approval for same sex marriage. (sarcasm)
peacepipe
05-12-2012, 07:46 AM
What are the odds that no matter what Romney does there will always be a "hit piece" out there?
I'd say pretty good because he's a low character man child who doesn't have any convictions of his own.
And FYI, if this was all some orchestrated deal then why did the White House have a "reveal" strategy drawn out that had them announcing it in a couple weeks that just got scuttled by Biden speaking up too soon?
Also, a well corroborated, well investigated, character piece on a presidential candidate is not a "hit piece". It's solid journalism.
exactly,it is a presidential campaign evrything,except family, is fair game. the media went as far back as elementary school to accuse obama of going to a madrasa.the worst part of that was there was no truth to it. willard can't even deny what he did in prep school.
barryr
05-12-2012, 07:55 AM
exactly,it is a presidential campaign evrything,except family, is fair game. the media went as far back as elementary school to accuse obama of going to a madrasa.the worst part of that was there was no truth to it. willard can't even deny what he did in prep school.
Except for Palin, where family was ok to include of course. Hypocrites.
barryr
05-12-2012, 07:58 AM
What are the odds that no matter what Romney does there will always be a "hit piece" out there?
I'd say pretty good because he's a low character man child who doesn't have any convictions of his own.
And FYI, if this was all some orchestrated deal then why did the White House have a "reveal" strategy drawn out that had them announcing it in a couple weeks that just got scuttled by Biden speaking up too soon?
Also, a well corroborated, well investigated, character piece on a presidential candidate is not a "hit piece". It's solid journalism.
You must believe in coincidences then. Yeah, the media just decided to worry about Romney's high school and college days a couple weeks ago. Sure. Then would be nice to see the same diligence of investigation about Obama's past as well instead of just taking his word for it like has mostly been done to this point.
You must believe in coincidences then. Yeah, the media just decided to worry about Romney's high school and college days a couple weeks ago. Sure. Then would be nice to see the same diligence of investigation about Obama's past as well instead of just taking his word for it like has mostly been done to this point.
The chip on your shoulder, it is very large. The media's function these days is sell so they can make advertising money. They don't care who the story is about or what context it is put in and even accuracy is a moving target. They all do it especially your faux news, so move on to a better thing to whine about.
peacepipe
05-12-2012, 08:21 AM
You must believe in coincidences then. Yeah, the media just decided to worry about Romney's high school and college days a couple weeks ago. Sure. Then would be nice to see the same diligence of investigation about Obama's past as well instead of just taking his word for it like has mostly been done to this point.
where were you during the 2008 elections? the media went as far back as his elementary school trying find dirt on obama,it kept going even after obama got elected.
what you also fail to realize or choose to ignore is that everyone knows obama & his background. they don't know willard. the media is doing what they always do.
if willard is unable to show who he is to the public,someoneelse will..
Requiem
05-12-2012, 08:21 AM
I'm pretty sure that all we heard about Obama during his emergence in the primaries were pieces like this one about Romney. Barry was obviously watching FAUX, so he should know. Then again, the dude has proven to be a habitual liar on this forum since inception and has been caught with his pants down on more than one occasion. It is actually a blessing that pointing his flaws as a person out has stopped him from being involved more on the boards.