PDA

View Full Version : With the 36th pick the Broncos select


supermanhr9
04-27-2012, 09:31 AM
Courtney Upshaw or Jerel Worthy. I am betting what small reputation I have on the Mane on this prediction.:strong:

maven
04-27-2012, 09:32 AM
Lamar Miller

U

bronco militia
04-27-2012, 09:33 AM
they will trade down

MVP-06
04-27-2012, 09:33 AM
just ask empireorange

peacepipe
04-27-2012, 09:34 AM
steven hill or alameda ta'amu

slatimer
04-27-2012, 09:34 AM
Peter King thinks it will be Thompson.

Bigdawg26
04-27-2012, 09:35 AM
Lamar Miller or Worthy. I think it's going to be Miller.

Harvitz81
04-27-2012, 09:35 AM
I'm betting Alshon Jeffrey, WR from south carolina.

55CrushEm
04-27-2012, 09:35 AM
Coby Fleener.........and then I go ape**** mad.

Rohirrim
04-27-2012, 09:36 AM
I don't see Upshaw as an upgrade over Ayers. Probably not as good, actually. Worthy is the one I'm hoping for. I'll be happy with Fleener, Randle or Hill, although can Manning throw it far enough to get to Hill? ;D

srphoenix
04-27-2012, 09:38 AM
I think we basically have all of the same options as we were looking at pick 25.

Worthy
D. Still
L. Miller
K. Reyes
P. Konz

OrangeSe7en
04-27-2012, 09:38 AM
Lamar Miller or Worthy. I think it's going to be Miller.

It could be both and even a third player in the 2nd.

They now have the ammunition to draft a OL, DT, and RB in the 2nd round.

Drek
04-27-2012, 09:39 AM
Cordy Glenn.

yerner
04-27-2012, 09:40 AM
Jeffery

Victor
04-27-2012, 09:42 AM
they will trade down

That's right...they're looking to get down into the fourth and fifth round where all the value is.

ColoradoBuff
04-27-2012, 09:44 AM
has us taking Fleener and Chapman

http://www.sbnation.com/2012-nfl-draft/2012/4/27/2979648/round-2-nfl-mock-draft

Rohirrim
04-27-2012, 09:44 AM
Cordy Glenn.

If he's still on the board he would definitely be the BPA. I'd be happy with that.

ColoradoBuff
04-27-2012, 09:44 AM
i think it's either Miller or Fleener @ 36 and Thompson @ 57

supermanhr9
04-27-2012, 09:53 AM
How come Worthy dropped out of the first? I thought for sure he'd go already. What's his downside? He had more success than Dontari Po and played in a big boy conference and pulled double teams unlike Mr. Kansas City Chief.

pricejj
04-27-2012, 09:56 AM
Lamar Miller, Peter Konz, or Stephen Hill

followed by a trade up to ~40 to snatch a UT.

Goobzilla
04-27-2012, 09:57 AM
Traded for 3 7ths and swap 6th rounders in 2013. Yay?

yerner
04-27-2012, 09:59 AM
has us taking Fleener and Chapman

http://www.sbnation.com/2012-nfl-draft/2012/4/27/2979648/round-2-nfl-mock-draft

if new england gets thompson too, that would be a hell of a draft for them.

rbackfactory80
04-27-2012, 10:00 AM
The tight end out of Stanford.

maher_tyler
04-27-2012, 10:02 AM
The more i think about it, the more i want one of the remaining top DTs. After that i could see us giving up one of our 4th rounders to move up in the 2nd to take Hill or Jeffrey. James or Turbin in the 3rd if they are there.

pricejj
04-27-2012, 10:08 AM
The more i think about it, the more i want one of the remaining top DTs. After that i could see us giving up one of our 4th rounders to move up in the 2nd to take Hill or Jeffrey. James or Turbin in the 3rd if they are there.

Why pick a DT at #36, when you can trade up for one from #57?

There are still 6 Offensive guys with 1st round grades (Cordy Glenn, Jonathan Martin, Peter Konz, Lamar Miller, Stephen Hill, and Coby Fleener).

peacepipe
04-27-2012, 10:11 AM
2nd rd is going to be top heavy with DT/OL picks. in all likelyhood any DT worth taking in the 2nd maybe gone by 57. IMO

SpringStein
04-27-2012, 10:12 AM
2nd rd is going to be top heavy with DT/OL picks. in all likelyhood any DT worth taking in the 2nd maybe gone by 57. IMO

I think the early part will be WR/OL run.

cousinal11
04-27-2012, 10:12 AM
The tight end out of Stanford.

Didn't we just sign Dreessen & Tamme?

hambone13
04-27-2012, 10:13 AM
Cordy Glenn.

I would love this pick. We need a fatty to keep Bobble-Head's neck aboard. The analysis looks good for his feet as well. Sad thing is, he may go to Baltimore right in front of us. They need OL talent as well.

Bigdawg26
04-27-2012, 10:13 AM
Didn't we just sign Dreessen & Tamme?

THANK YOU! Also, we did draft 2 TE's last year!

Lestat
04-27-2012, 10:14 AM
How come Worthy dropped out of the first? I thought for sure he'd go already. What's his downside? He had more success than Dontari Po and played in a big boy conference and pulled double teams unlike Mr. Kansas City Chief.

he takes games off, dominant in a big game than disappears in the next. doesn't play hard every down and there is fear that once he gets paid he will quit on you.

i didn't want to sniff him in the first but as a 2nd rounder he's good value, not sure i'd take him #36 but might trade up with one of the 4th's or gain a extra 2nd and grab him.

it'd be sweet if we could grab Hill,Glenn and Thompson in the 2nd.
i wouldn't mind snagging Brooks or Silatolu at G instead of Glenn if he's off the board though.

peacepipe
04-27-2012, 10:14 AM
I think the early part will be WR/OL run.this draft is pretty thin at WR. if a lot of recievers go,then you got quite a few teams reaching.

socalorado
04-27-2012, 10:14 AM
Why pick a DT at #36, when you can trade up for one from #57?

There are still 6 Offensive guys with 1st round grades (Cordy Glenn, Jonathan Martin, Peter Konz, Lamar Miller, Stephen Hill, and Coby Fleener).

Everyone but Fleener. I would hope the move back up and grab Thompson or Ta'ammu as well and still have another 2nd to play with .
I would love it if DEN used a 2013 2nd to get back into the 2nd again.

ColoradoBuff
04-27-2012, 10:17 AM
Klis doesn't think Fleener fits the Broncos

http://blogs.denverpost.com/broncos/2012/04/27/coby-fleener-fit-broncos/13187/

Lestat
04-27-2012, 10:17 AM
this draft is pretty thin at WR. if a lot of recievers go,then you got quite a few teams reaching.

no it's not, you just didn't have a ton with 1st round grades. Hill,Jeffery,Sanu,Quick,Givens,Randle,Jones,Criner ,Hilton,Childs,Hilton or Broyles still on the board

hambone13
04-27-2012, 10:20 AM
Klis doesn't think Fleener fits the Broncos

http://blogs.denverpost.com/broncos/2012/04/27/coby-fleener-fit-broncos/13187/

How could he not go to Indy? They have no one at TE of value and give a safety net for Luck. Seems like a no-brainer to me.

peacepipe
04-27-2012, 10:20 AM
no it's not, you just didn't have a ton with 1st round grades. Hill,Jeffery,Sanu,Quick,Givens,Randle,Jones,Criner ,Hilton,Childs,Hilton or Broyles still on the board

outside of randle & hill none have stood out to me.

OrangeSe7en
04-27-2012, 10:21 AM
Lets say the Broncos take a DT, does everyone expect him to start day one?

I was just thinking about this because I was thinking of the possibility of getting 3 starters in at OL, RB, and DT if they decided they want to trade up into the 2nd with their 3rd and some of the 4ths.

peacepipe
04-27-2012, 10:23 AM
Lets say the Broncos take a DT, does everyone expect him to start day one?

I was just thinking about this because I was thinking of the possibility of getting 3 starters in at OL, RB, and DT if they decided they want to trade up into the 2nd with their 3rd and some of the 4ths.

I think ta'amu,thompson could be starters day 1.

socalorado
04-27-2012, 10:24 AM
Lets say the Broncos take a DT, does everyone expect him to start day one?

I was just thinking about this because I was thinking of the possibility of getting 3 starters in at OL, RB, and DT if they decided they want to trade up into the 2nd with their 3rd and some of the 4ths.

DEN should do everything in its power including using a 2013 2nd to get 4 2nd rounders for today.
Address
DT (Twice)
OL
RB (possibly use one to get JStew from CAR) Or Turbin.
CB (maybe)

Requiem
04-27-2012, 10:24 AM
My prediction would be Jerel Worthy or Kendall Reyes @ 36. I'd be fine with Miller or Glenn as well. I think Denver should get another second rounder or trade up in the second and get some of these Bottom 1/Top 2 values. Who knows, maybe we trade down again. I just hope we don't get rick rolled by a team wanting to move up. Everyone in the top part of the round is in good position.

socalorado
04-27-2012, 10:24 AM
I think ta'amu,thompson could be starters day 1.

Me too. Both are stout against the run. especially Ta'ammu. And thats what DEN needs to play next to the rest of these UT types they already have.

TonyR
04-27-2012, 10:30 AM
Klis doesn't think Fleener fits the Broncos

http://blogs.denverpost.com/broncos/2012/04/27/coby-fleener-fit-broncos/13187/

I was just going to post this. And I have to agree. Wouldn't make any sense.

Lestat
04-27-2012, 10:33 AM
outside of randle & hill none have stood out to me.

ok, but that doesn't mean it's weak. QB yes, TE in terms of potential immediate impact yes, but WR is pretty deep this year.

Lestat
04-27-2012, 10:35 AM
guys that could start from day 1 are Thompson,Ta'Amu,Reyes. Still,Worthy and Wolfe could but most likely will have to be brought along slowly.

but Chapman and Howard are also very good value in the 3rd, Chapman when healthy has first round NT potential.

Bmore Manning
04-27-2012, 10:35 AM
DEN should do everything in its power including using a 2013 2nd to get 4 2nd rounders for today.
Address
DT (Twice)
OL
RB (possibly use one to get JStew from CAR) Or Turbin.
CB (maybe)

I would love to see a package of picks players to have 4 second round picks.

outdoor_miner
04-27-2012, 10:35 AM
I am going with EmpireOrange on this. That means OL, WR, TE, or QB. I think their target is someone they were very confident would be available at the Top of the 2nd. Strike Fleener and Hill, as they were projected in the first by most. Fleener also doesn't make much sense given our acquisitions in FA. None of the other WRs seem like Manning receivers to me. That means OL. I am guessing a Guard to upgrade Beadles and provide insurance for Kuper. I think it is Glenn or Silatolu. Again, presuming it is someone they were confident would be available in the 2nd, I think Silatolu.

ColoradoBuff
04-27-2012, 10:41 AM
After thinking about Elway's comments....I don't think Fleener or Glenn is going to be our choice. Fleener and Glenn have slid down the draft board and Elway's comments were, the one's they wanted didn't make it to 25 or 31 so that's why traded back! If Fleener or Glenn were on their short list @ 25 or 31 they would have taken them!

scorpio
04-27-2012, 10:44 AM
Miller @ 36

socalorado
04-27-2012, 10:46 AM
After thinking about Elway's comments....I don't think Fleener or Glenn is going to be our choice. Fleener and Glenn have slid down the draft board and Elway's comments were, the one's they wanted didn't make it to 25 or 31 so that's why traded back! If Fleener or Glenn were on their short list @ 25 or 31 they would have taken them!

If they draft Fleener there is gonna be a nuclear meltdown here.
Tamme and Dreessen were just signed as FA. Many would consider that a
HUGE waste of a pick after trading down.

Frosty78
04-27-2012, 10:46 AM
They're walking out of the 2nd round with Lamar Miller (with their first pick) and Kendall Reyes (with their second).

Old Dude
04-27-2012, 10:46 AM
I'm going to guess that they finally get their DT. Who, I don't know, though it sounds like Worthy is highest on a number of boards.

Drek
04-27-2012, 10:47 AM
After thinking about Elway's comments....I don't think Fleener or Glenn is going to be our choice. Fleener and Glenn have slid down the draft board and Elway's comments were, the one's they wanted didn't make it to 25 or 31 so that's why traded back! If Fleener or Glenn were on their short list @ 25 or 31 they would have taken them!

I think they're just looking for the ideal value position to catch a slider. You can make the same argument you just made for any person they could possibly pick at #25. They moved down because none of the guys they wanted to spend a first on fell to them and if its picking from Worthy, Glenn, Fleener, Still, etc. they'd rather pick up additional value in the process because they're all close enough on their board.

Play2win
04-27-2012, 10:48 AM
I was just going to post this. And I have to agree. Wouldn't make any sense.

Makes a lot of sense to me. Line up two great receiving TE's + Decker + DT... With Manning throwing to them. Sounds like all-win to me.

Requiem
04-27-2012, 10:49 AM
Man, the Rams owned this draft. Were able to get Brockers, now they have (33) (39) and (45). Good job, Fisher and Friends!

cousinal11
04-27-2012, 10:54 AM
Today I feel like Bill Murray in Groundhog's Day considering we are still yet to make a pick. I'm ready to see what our Broncos do tonight.

HAT
04-27-2012, 10:56 AM
The first pick will be Reyes just as it always was going to be....then a trade up into the 40s....3 picks between 36-57.

TonyR
04-27-2012, 10:57 AM
Makes a lot of sense to me. Line up two great receiving TE's + Decker + DT... With Manning throwing to them. Sounds like all-win to me.

I understand that thinking. The one issue I have is that they drafted 2 TE's last year and signed 2 more in FA this year. So you're definitely employing sunk cost theory if you draft Fleener. We just have so many more pressing needs than TE.

Requiem
04-27-2012, 10:58 AM
The first pick will be Reyes just as it always was going to be....then a trade up into the 40s....3 picks between 36-57.

Reyes/Worth, Miller, L. David. BOOM.

55CrushEm
04-27-2012, 11:00 AM
The first pick will be Reyes just as it always was going to be....then a trade up into the 40s....3 picks between 36-57.

Interesting that Mayock has Reyes at #56 on his top 100 list.

He has Worthy at #26.

cmhargrove
04-27-2012, 11:02 AM
Glenn would be good, Worthy is a good value here.
You could pick up one of two blue chip WR's.
Zach Brown or Mychal Kendricks at LB.

Lots of good choices, so this is still a BPA spot. If you want Thompson, I bet he will still be available with our next pick at the bottom of the round.

This will be interesting. I like Fleener as a prospect, but I would be happy with about any pick but him right now. We really need to hit gold in rounds 2-4. I would be totally cool with packaging a second and fourth round pick to jump up a little higher in round 2. We could easily land 2 starters in the top half of this round.

NFLBRONCO
04-27-2012, 11:04 AM
Get Manning a weapon at 36

Bmore Manning
04-27-2012, 11:04 AM
Reyes/Worth, Miller, L. David. BOOM.

Reyes, Miller, Lavonte David... Sick!

Bmore Manning
04-27-2012, 11:06 AM
Man, the Rams owned this draft. Were able to get Brockers, now they have (33) (39) and (45). Good job, Fisher and Friends!

Ironically I have read that some experts view STL as losers passing on Claiborne for Brockers, apparently DT wasn't thought of as a need..

MVP-06
04-27-2012, 11:08 AM
That's right...they're looking to get down into the fourth and fifth round where all the value is.

this horse has been beat, kicked, shot, choked, ran over, and shot again. Get over it

outdoor_miner
04-27-2012, 11:20 AM
this horse has been beat, kicked, shot, choked, ran over, and shot again. Get over it

Hey! That horse sounds like a prototypical Xanders "value" signing! Sign him up for a 1 year contract to replace Thunder. ^5

Just kidding, by the way.

Rohirrim
04-27-2012, 11:27 AM
I understand that thinking. The one issue I have is that they drafted 2 TE's last year and signed 2 more in FA this year. So you're definitely employing sunk cost theory if you draft Fleener. We just have so many more pressing needs than TE.

If they did take Fleener, I doubt they would be thinking of him as a TE. He ran the same 40 time as Vince Jackson, weighs 20 pounds more and is an inch taller. Slim him down a little and he might be a killer weapon, especially in the EZ.

LetsGoBroncos
04-27-2012, 11:28 AM
I for the life of me can't understand why we would even consider Fleener. Why did we sign 2 free agent TE's? And we have Julius Thomas

pricejj
04-27-2012, 11:32 AM
They're walking out of the 2nd round with Lamar Miller (with their first pick) and Kendall Reyes (with their second).

This would be the most probable scenario. However, I would prefer Konz then Wolfe.

I think Baltimore will pick Konz, so we will be left with Miller. We will need to maneuver to trade up for Wolfe, Reyes, or Thompson from #57.

Rohirrim
04-27-2012, 11:37 AM
I doubt Konz could take the job from Walton.

Heyneck
04-27-2012, 11:38 AM
If they did take Fleener, I doubt they would be thinking of him as a TE. He ran the same 40 time as Vince Jackson, weighs 20 pounds more and is an inch taller. Slim him down a little and he might be a killer weapon, especially in the EZ.

Why switch him? He would give us something at TE position that most of the NFL is transitioning to. Plus... with that speed and size at TE he would be more of a weapon in the EZ than at WR. We already have the size with DT and Decker... if we could have someone that takes coverage away from them... is huge mismatch against Lbs... Peyton could kill it!

Rohirrim
04-27-2012, 11:40 AM
Why switch him? He would give us something at TE position that most of the NFL is transitioning to. Plus... with that speed and size at TE he would be more of a weapon in the EZ than at WR. We already have the size with DT and Decker... if we could have someone that takes coverage away from them... is huge mismatch against Lbs... Peyton could kill it!

That's the benefit of a guy like Fleener. I watched a lot of Stanford games. Harbaugh (and then, Shaw) both used Fleener all over the field. Manning would kill with a guy like that.

Mat'hir Uth Gan
04-27-2012, 11:42 AM
Lots of options for 3 tech DTs still available:

Jerel Worthy
Devon Still
Derek Wolfe
Kendall Reyes


I hope we trade down a little bit, all of those guys are about the same. I'd prefer Worthy or Wolfe, but if we could get Reyes and an extra 3rd or 4th, that would be fine too.



WLB is the other position pretty stacked right now, and depending on what we want to do with DJ Williams, one of these guys could be an option there:

Lavonte David
Zach Brown
Bobby Wagner
Mychal Kendricks

Requiem
04-27-2012, 11:44 AM
We have butt loads of options.

Mogulseeker
04-27-2012, 11:52 AM
Please no running back.

We pick fourth and 4 guys I wanted are still available:

Peter Konz, Jerel Worthy, Devon Still, and Cordy Glenn.

I hope it's one of those guys.

Conklin
04-27-2012, 12:02 PM
we take jenkens with our first pick and miller with our second pick

barryr
04-27-2012, 12:06 PM
One knock I have read about Miller in more than place, besides maybe injuries which could be for any RB, is the worry he can pick up a complex playbook. Also the concern about his pass receiving skills. Seeing Martin and Wilson jump ahead of him maybe shows those teams had those concerns too.

Lestat
04-27-2012, 12:20 PM
One knock I have read about Miller in more than place, besides maybe injuries which could be for any RB, is the worry he can pick up a complex playbook. Also the concern about his pass receiving skills. Seeing Martin and Wilson jump ahead of him maybe shows those teams had those concerns too.

i think it has more to do with them being more complete run,catch and block backs than him struggling to pick up a playbook.
Miller is the classic Broncos type of back, one cut and go but he's fast as hell.
he's only had one year of starting duty and he's coming off a shoulder injury.

that said, Miller has been my favorite back in the draft for months and if we have a chance to grab him i want him. i wouldn't mind them grabbing Turbin or Pierce later on in the 4th or 5th either though.

gtown
04-27-2012, 12:28 PM
I am going with EmpireOrange on this. That means OL, WR, TE, or QB. I think their target is someone they were very confident would be available at the Top of the 2nd. Strike Fleener and Hill, as they were projected in the first by most. Fleener also doesn't make much sense given our acquisitions in FA. None of the other WRs seem like Manning receivers to me. That means OL. I am guessing a Guard to upgrade Beadles and provide insurance for Kuper. I think it is Glenn or Silatolu. Again, presuming it is someone they were confident would be available in the 2nd, I think Silatolu.

This. Moving to 2nd round seems preordained. Usually C and OG are bottom 1st top 2nd picks. This makes sense for Manning. He has always struggled with up the middle rushers. Plus Beadles and Walton suck. This would provide insurance for our $94 million investment at QB.

RADRHATR
04-27-2012, 12:30 PM
No doubt it will be Worthy

BroncoBuff
04-27-2012, 02:02 PM
No doubt it will be Worthy

Hope so ... just noticed he blocked 3 kicks in college. That's not easy, especially lining up against all those corn-fed Big 10 O-linemen.

Worthy might not have huge upside, but his floor is solid.

broncolife
04-27-2012, 02:08 PM
A week ago I had a dream that we traded for Thompson. Didnt even know who he was.

ColoradoBuff
04-27-2012, 02:24 PM
<S>@</S>cecillammey (http://twitter.com/#!/cecillammey) what is your gut best guess for broncos at 36 at this point?

(http://twitter.com/#)




<SMALL class=time>5m (http://twitter.com/#!/cecillammey/status/195970438499811329) </SMALL>http://a0.twimg.com/profile_images/1909592256/headshot_normal.jpg Cecil Lammey ‏ <S>@</S>cecillammey (http://twitter.com/#!/cecillammey)
<S>@</S>Ndlong7 (http://twitter.com/#!/Ndlong7) Jonathan Martin, Stephen Hill, or Chris Polk



please no to Polk or Hill @ 36.

Play2win
04-27-2012, 02:24 PM
I understand that thinking. The one issue I have is that they drafted 2 TE's last year and signed 2 more in FA this year. So you're definitely employing sunk cost theory if you draft Fleener. We just have so many more pressing needs than TE.

I gotcha, but sometimes you have to over-invest to get a rock-solid solution for years to come. If TE is going to be a keystone position in our offense– which I hope it will be– there is smart money in it for the long-term.

I would just love to see DT/Fleener/Decker lineup for Peyton. Talk about 3 big guys who can all make catches. It would be fun to watch :thumbsup:

Rohirrim
04-27-2012, 02:25 PM
we take jenkens with our first pick and miller with our second pick

And I'll drink until I fall off the deck and kill myself.

OrangeCrush2724
04-27-2012, 02:26 PM
My bet is on Sanu WR Rutgers.

Requiem
04-27-2012, 02:28 PM
Now Lammey is changing his tune because of what he heard from Klis. If we take Martin (who is soft) or Polk at 36, I'll be picking a new team to root for.

Play2win
04-27-2012, 02:29 PM
That's the benefit of a guy like Fleener. I watched a lot of Stanford games. Harbaugh (and then, Shaw) both used Fleener all over the field. Manning would kill with a guy like that.

If we could get Fleener and, later, LaMichael James, Peyton would turn this offense into a freaking buzz-saw.

ColoradoBuff
04-27-2012, 02:42 PM
Now Lammey is changing his tune because of what he heard from Klis. If we take Martin (who is soft) or Polk at 36, I'll be picking a new team to root for.

I wouldn't go that far to picking a new team to root for....but i would think it's time to re-evaluate the decision making going on with EFX. I gave them a pass last nite. PFW has Polk's stock dropping to the 4th round.....where i am fine picking him at if we don't land Miller. But Polk in the 2nd is retarded!

http://cache.profootballweekly.com/prospects/player/chris-polk-1/

pricejj
04-27-2012, 03:14 PM
Konz to replace the worst Center in the NFL.

Requiem
04-27-2012, 03:15 PM
OL makes more sense given Beadles and Walton struggling, Kuper is injured and Clady being in a contract year. It wouldn't surprise me.

pricejj
04-27-2012, 03:18 PM
OL makes more sense given Beadles and Walton struggling, Kuper is injured and Clady being in a contract year. It wouldn't surprise me.

Konzly konz konz...McKonzly konz konzin makonzin. Konzo?

Requiem
04-27-2012, 03:20 PM
Konzly konz konz...McKonzly konz konzin makonzin. Konzo?

Couldn't complain with Peter Konz @ 36.

Gcver2ver3
04-27-2012, 03:23 PM
Konz @36 is good value imo...

peacepipe
04-27-2012, 03:29 PM
If we could get Fleener and, later, LaMichael James, Peyton would turn this offense into a freaking buzz-saw.

fleener may be the most overrated player in the draft.why draft a 6'5"+ player that runs a 4.5 when you could get one that runs a 4.36? with the TEs tamme & dreesen & with WRs demarious thomas,eric decker & stephen hill our offense would practicly be unstoppable.
but again we need defense. unless maybe hill than ta'amu?
Thomas 6-4 4.3
Decker 6-3 4.5
Hill 6-5 4.3
one hell of a recieving core.

Mogulseeker
04-27-2012, 03:32 PM
Konzly konz konz...McKonzly konz konzin makonzin. Konzo?

This.

Rohirrim
04-27-2012, 03:34 PM
Now Lammey is changing his tune because of what he heard from Klis. If we take Martin (who is soft) or Polk at 36, I'll be picking a new team to root for.

I don't think he's so much soft as he's more of a cerebral, technique guy rather than a mauler. He's waaaaaay smart. Both parents Harvard grads. He was invited to Harvard too. Very good run blocker. Might not have the lateral moves to be a LT but would probably come right in and dominate at LG. Here's what Rang says, "Plays with a nasty streak. Solid character and work ethic."

Don't forget the Stanford connection.

pricejj
04-27-2012, 03:37 PM
Couldn't complain with Peter Konz @ 36.

Then it's time to rustle up the tack and and go on a UT hunt.

Grab the rifles, and bring the ammo, cause it ain't gonna be pretty.

Take no prisoner's...shootin' all the way up the board in Round 2!!

:charge:

yerner
04-27-2012, 03:48 PM
And I'll drink until I fall off the deck and kill myself.

You're just scared Janoris will get Manning pregnant.

orinjkrush
04-27-2012, 03:55 PM
DEN should do everything in its power including using a 2013 2nd to get 4 2nd rounders for today.
Address
DT (Twice)
OL
RB (possibly use one to get JStew from CAR) Or Turbin.
CB (maybe)

exactly. fourth round and below should be packaged so we come away with 3-4 starters or heavy contributors.

Rohirrim
04-27-2012, 03:57 PM
You're just scared Janoris will get Manning pregnant.

I could just see all his baby mamas picketing Dove Valley. "Mo money! Mo money!"

barryr
04-27-2012, 03:57 PM
<S>@</S>cecillammey (http://twitter.com/#!/cecillammey) what is your gut best guess for broncos at 36 at this point?

(http://twitter.com/#)




<SMALL class=time>5m (http://twitter.com/#!/cecillammey/status/195970438499811329) </SMALL>http://a0.twimg.com/profile_images/1909592256/headshot_normal.jpg Cecil Lammey ‏ <S>@</S>cecillammey (http://twitter.com/#!/cecillammey)
<S>@</S>Ndlong7 (http://twitter.com/#!/Ndlong7) Jonathan Martin, Stephen Hill, or Chris Polk



please no to Polk or Hill @ 36.

Polk? I'd prefer another trade down and get a 2nd in the next draft in the deal if that is really who they are targeting.

Tombstone RJ
04-27-2012, 04:00 PM
OL makes more sense given Beadles and Walton struggling, Kuper is injured and Clady being in a contract year. It wouldn't surprise me.

I thought that EFX was negotiating a new contract with Clady.

uplink
04-27-2012, 04:39 PM
The broncos keep trading until all their picks are in the 4th round.

Play2win
04-27-2012, 04:49 PM
The broncos keep trading until all their picks are in the 4th round.

Or until they turn all of their picks in the 4th round to higher picks in the 4th round Hilarious!

ayjackson
04-27-2012, 05:09 PM
Kendall Reyes

OBF1
04-27-2012, 05:30 PM
A complete wiff by the mane draft guru's.

errand
04-27-2012, 05:32 PM
Yes, a huge whiff by all the so-called draft gurus on here.

again coaches, and front office people thinking different than clowns living in their mom's basement.

Derek Wolfe DT Cincinnati....6'5" 295 who had 9.5 sacks....and despite being one of the more productive DT's, was kind of under the radar.

broncogary
04-27-2012, 05:40 PM
Yes, a huge whiff by all the so-called draft gurus on here.

again coaches, and front office people thinking different than clowns living in their mom's basement.

Derek Wolfe DT Cincinnati....6'5" 295 who had 9.5 sacks....and despite being one of the more productive DT's, was kind of under the radar.

God I hate it when errand's right.:oyvey:

barryr
04-27-2012, 05:41 PM
Yes, a huge whiff by all the so-called draft gurus on here.

again coaches, and front office people thinking different than clowns living in their mom's basement.

Derek Wolfe DT Cincinnati....6'5" 295 who had 9.5 sacks....and despite being one of the more productive DT's, was kind of under the radar.

For someone who says he's happy with whatever the Broncos are doing, you sure seem more interested in fighting with people.If it's not about Tebow, it's this. Are you that unhappy in your life that you need to come in here and act like a jerk in every single post you make? Geez, lighten up for a day at least.

Ratboy
04-27-2012, 05:42 PM
Yes, a huge whiff by all the so-called draft gurus on here.

again coaches, and front office people thinking different than clowns living in their mom's basement.

Derek Wolfe DT Cincinnati....6'5" 295 who had 9.5 sacks....and despite being one of the more productive DT's, was kind of under the radar.

This is why I don't even try anymore.

I'll let the professionals do their job and I will support the players.

errand
04-27-2012, 05:49 PM
For someone who says he's happy with whatever the Broncos are doing, you sure seem more interested in fighting with people.If it's not about Tebow, it's this. Are you that unhappy in your life that you need to come in here and act like a jerk in every single post you make? Geez, lighten up for a day at least.

you follow me around to bitch about me all the f****** time.... Perhaps somebody else is acting like a jerk and needs to give it a rest.

It's a message board....it's a place to argue, debate (hopefully like adults) .....

I said the pick would be someone that nobody had thought it would be.... and that more than half of you would hate the pick, basically blowing a gasket in your skulls........ which basically means I was correct. so no, I'm not unhappy at all.

OCBronco
04-27-2012, 05:50 PM
For a guy who supposedly sucks, Wolfe sure has a lot of sacks and tackles in the backfield.

This is an interesting pick. We needed more interior pass rush. On third downs, double teams go to either Von or Doom. Kind of reminds me of a Giants d-lineman.

errand
04-27-2012, 05:52 PM
This is why I don't even try anymore.

I'll let the professionals do their job and I will support the players.

that's my philosophy too.... I'm not a professional football coach or front office man.... and just because I have a computer and access to the internet and youtube doesn't make me a draft expert.

I just think it's funny we had all these guys claiming they knew it was gonna be, and if this guy gets selected it's bad value blah blah blah blah blah ad nauseum.

SouthStndJunkie
04-27-2012, 05:53 PM
I'm fine with Derek Wolfe at 36.

21.5 tackles for loss and 9.5 sacks his senior year.

2011 Big East Defensive Player of the Year.

He'll provide some pass rush from the inside.

I like that long frame at over 6'5.

Lined up at defensive end, defensive tackle and nose tackle in Cincinnati's scheme.

errand
04-27-2012, 05:56 PM
God I hate it when errand's right.:oyvey:

I did not know it would be derek wolfe, but I did know that it would be someone like him, a guy that nobody else on this site was anywhere near suggesting we would pick.

and he seems like a pretty damn good player..... I just have fun laughing at everyone that thinks they know more than anyone else does..... and of course it's always the usual suspects were butt hurt by it..

pricejj
04-27-2012, 05:56 PM
Brian Xanders for President!!

Way to step up to the plate EFX...Derek Wolfe, best UT in the draft!! :sunshine:

<object style="height: 390px; width: 640px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lRypFAtMCYI?version=3&feature=player_detailpage"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lRypFAtMCYI?version=3&feature=player_detailpage" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="360"></object>

barryr
04-27-2012, 05:56 PM
I'm fine with Derek Wolfe at 36.

21.5 tackles for loss and 9.5 sacks his senior year.

2011 Big East Defensive Player of the Year.

He'll provide some pass rush from the inside.

I like that long frame at over 6'5.

Lined up at defensive end, defensive tackle and nose tackle in Cincinnati's scheme.

That is their thinking for sure. If want a run stuffing DT, can get one later, but DT's that can rush the passer are hard to get. If Wolfe can provide that, he is a great pick. He at least has shown the ability at some level to do that and more chance he can than some other DT who did not show that in college.

cutthemdown
04-27-2012, 06:03 PM
I had said often in earlier threads Broncos would look for athletic DT that can play at altitude and not big fatties. Looks like so far I was right. I mentioned Wolfe, Wynn, as real possibilities.

cutthemdown
04-27-2012, 06:04 PM
I did not know it would be derek wolfe, but I did know that it would be someone like him, a guy that nobody else on this site was anywhere near suggesting we would pick.

and he seems like a pretty damn good player..... I just have fun laughing at everyone that thinks they know more than anyone else does..... and of course it's always the usual suspects were butt hurt by it..

Better check my earlier posts from a couple weeks ago. I listed a few guys at DT Broncos would like and he was one of them. Broncos don't go for huge fatties at DT because they get winded playing at a Mile High!