PDA

View Full Version : Broncos did not receive any comp picks today


campocorto
03-26-2012, 02:16 PM
http://twitter.com/#!/MileHighReport/status/184381397841096705

http://espn.go.com/blog/afcwest

Raiders received three comp picks. The Chargers got a seventh.

Chris
03-26-2012, 02:18 PM
Dicknoses.

UltimateHoboW/Shotgun
03-26-2012, 02:21 PM
EmmmEfffffkers!

UberBroncoMan
03-26-2012, 02:23 PM
Pretty ****ed up.

Oakland gets a 3rd, 4th and 5th...lol.

Losing Nnamdi is the only one that should realistically be high.

Gcver2ver3
03-26-2012, 02:37 PM
i didnt think we would...

we didnt exactly lose world beaters...

Tombstone RJ
03-26-2012, 02:40 PM
Wow, it looks like the nfl just wanted to make sure chokeland wasn't totally screwed in this upcoming draft. The nfl effectively salvaged the draft for the faiders with this crap.

bronco militia
03-26-2012, 02:43 PM
Under the rules for compensatory draft selections, a team losing more or better compensatory free agents than it acquires in the previous year are eligible to receive compensatory draft picks.

In 2011, Oakland lost free agents Nnamdi Asomugha, Robert Gallery, Bruce Gradkowski, Zach Miller and Thomas Howard and signed Kevin Boss and Stephon Heyer. Teams do not get credit for comp pick consideration for cutting players.

UberBroncoMan
03-26-2012, 02:43 PM
Wow, it looks like the nfl just wanted to make sure chokeland wasn't totally screwed in this upcoming draft. The nfl effectively salvaged the draft for the faiders with this crap.

Pretty much. They were ****ed without this.

OBF1
03-26-2012, 02:44 PM
Here is the list:

3 33/95 Oakland
4 33/128 Minnesota
4 34/129 Oakland
4 35/130 Baltimore
4 36/131 N.Y. Giants
4 37/132 Green Bay
4 38/133 Green Bay
4 39/134 Minnesota
4 40/135 Dallas
5 33/168 Oakland
5 34/169 Baltimore
5 35/170 Indianapolis
6 33/202 N.Y. Jets
6 34/203 N.Y. Jets
6 35/204 Cleveland
6 36/205 Cleveland
6 37/206 Indianapolis
6 38/207 Carolina
7 33/240 Pittsburgh
7 34/241 Green Bay
7 35/242 N.Y. Jets
7 36/243 Green Bay
7 37/244 N.Y. Jets
7 38/245 Cleveland
7 39/246 Pittsburgh
7 40/247 Cleveland
7 41/248 Pittsburgh
7 42/249 Atlanta
7 43/250 San Diego
7 44/251 Buffalo
7 45/252 St. Louis
7 46/253 Indianpolis

Bronco Yoda
03-26-2012, 02:46 PM
F U Faiders

Drunken.Broncoholic
03-26-2012, 02:54 PM
They still lost Wimbley. That team is a joke.

Tombstone RJ
03-26-2012, 02:56 PM
They still lost Wimbley. That team is a joke.

point is aside from Nnamdi Ass, none of those other players are worth all these comp picks. Also, did you see Nambdi play last year? He sucked.

Crushaholic
03-26-2012, 02:59 PM
Nothing for Daniel Fells? I'm shocked...;D

TheReverend
03-26-2012, 03:05 PM
point is aside from Nnamdi Ass, none of those other players are worth all these comp picks. Also, did you see Nambdi play last year? He sucked.

......ummmmm, do you know compensatory pick allocation works?

Zach Miller was signed away to a 5-yr $34 million dollar deal.

Gallery was signed away to a 3-yr $15 mill deal.

Etc

Nothing for Daniel Fells? I'm shocked...;D

Don't think you know how this works....

UberBroncoMan
03-26-2012, 03:07 PM
Hoping Oakland misses big with these picks.

Tombstone RJ
03-26-2012, 03:10 PM
......ummmmm, do you know compensatory pick allocation works?

Zach Miller was signed away to a 5-yr $34 million dollar deal.

Gallery was signed away to a 3-yr $15 mill deal.

Etc



Don't think you know how this works....

so it's based on how big the contracts are?

TheReverend
03-26-2012, 03:11 PM
so it's based on how big the contracts are?

Both contract $ and performance, yes.

broncosteven
03-26-2012, 03:12 PM
This means Oakland has the luxury of taking a risk in drafting a troubled RB who is involved in gangs and hooked on Grey Goose.

TheReverend
03-26-2012, 03:13 PM
Simplified explanation:

"The round of the pick awarded is primarily determined by the annual value of the contract signed. Signed players cancel out lost players with equal contracts, then lower contracts, before canceling out higher contracts"

^ http://www.mockingthedraft.com/2012/1/6/2686334/2012-compensatory-draft-pick-predictions

BroncoMan4ever
03-26-2012, 03:33 PM
Hoping Oakland misses big with these picks.

well when considering recent history and the dumping of almost all their picks for a washed up shell of his former self QB we can probably safely assume they don't get much out of these picks.

Ratboy
03-26-2012, 03:40 PM
......ummmmm, do you know compensatory pick allocation works?

Zach Miller was signed away to a 5-yr $34 million dollar deal.

Gallery was signed away to a 3-yr $15 mill deal.

Etc



Don't think you know how this works....

WELL... We're definitely getting one for Tebow!

DBroncos4life
03-26-2012, 03:42 PM
On the plus side we don't have to worry about posters trying to trade these picks away.

TheReverend
03-26-2012, 03:45 PM
WELL... We're definitely getting one for Tebow!

http://menversus.com/images/bertstare.jpg

bronco militia
03-26-2012, 05:39 PM
......ummmmm, do you know compensatory pick allocation works?

Zach Miller was signed away to a 5-yr $34 million dollar deal.

Gallery was signed away to a 3-yr $15 mill deal.

Etc



Don't think you know how this works....

They must have missed my post

bowtown
03-26-2012, 06:08 PM
We'll probably still get at least a 2nd if Dawkins retires.

Beantown Bronco
03-26-2012, 06:11 PM
I honestly don't even remember what FAs we lost that signed elsewhere last year.

KevinJames
03-26-2012, 06:12 PM
No surprise to me we didn't lose anyone special via FA last year.

We should get one for Royal next year for sure, maybe even Bunk.

Beantown Bronco
03-26-2012, 06:15 PM
No surprise to me we didn't lose anyone special via FA last year.

We should get one for Royal next year for sure, maybe even Bunk.

Ummm, I think our signing of FA Peyton Manning to a $100 mil contract might negate any losses we had to FA this year.

KevinJames
03-26-2012, 06:19 PM
Ummm, I think our signing of FA Peyton Manning to a $100 mil contract might negate any losses we had to FA this year.

Oh yeah lol I still think thats a dream I keep forgetting it really happened.

so surreal still...

SimonFletcher73
03-26-2012, 06:23 PM
Manning doesn't count because he was cut by Indy.

TheReverend
03-26-2012, 06:30 PM
Manning doesn't count because he was cut by Indy.

^ that

Beantown Bronco
03-27-2012, 06:26 AM
Manning doesn't count because he was cut by Indy.

^ that

Are you guys sure about this?

I understand that "cut FAs" don't count FOR you in the comp pick calculations if YOU are the one doing the cutting (in other words, Manning won't be a "check mark" in the Colts favor next year), but do they definitely not count AGAINST the team that acquires them? Think about it. A FA acquisition is a FA acquisition after all. It shouldn't matter to the acquiring team how a FA actually came to be a FA.

Every source I've found specifically says "Teams do not get credit for comp pick consideration for cutting players", but they say nothing about how they effect the acquiring team.

55CrushEm
03-27-2012, 06:30 AM
WELL... We're definitely getting one for Tebow!

Um, no. No comp pick for Tebow. We TRADED him. We did not lose him in free agency.

Hercules Rockefeller
03-27-2012, 06:54 AM
Cut players aren't factored in for the signing team either.