PDA

View Full Version : Quit blaming Bush!


Rigs11
02-09-2012, 08:07 PM
Mr Erickson.Hilarious!


Conservatives see tough challenges on road to White House



Republicans looking to take back the White House in November face a challenging political environment, a trio of conservative political observers said Thursday at an annual gathering of conservative activists.

The recent controversy over health insurance coverage for contraception may help to turn out Catholic swing voters in key states, but the observers also said the Republican Party would do well to have its own positive agenda and clear messaging if it wants to unseat President Barack Obama.

"None of the signs that I see are particularly good," said Ralph Z. Hallow, chief political writer for The Washington Times.

Hallow added that polling he has seen indicates that intensity or enthusiasm about voting has moved from Republicans to Democrats. "I regard that as a very bad sign," he said.

The newspaperman continued, "The enthusiasm among Republican voters for any of the (GOP presidential) candidates is dangerously low so that ... none of these folks generates the enthusiasm needed in November to bring more Republican-voting independents and Republican activists and so on to the polls."

Conservative blogger Erick Erickson, who is also a CNN contributor, said the situation stems partly from the state of the Republican Party after the last GOP president left the White House.

"I actually blame (George W.) Bush for this," Erickson said to a packed ballroom. "Every president generally has an heir apparent when they leave office."

Vice President Dick Cheney did not succeed Bush as the GOP's presumptive standard bearer in 2008, preventing the party from having a "referendum" on Bush's legacy by either choosing Cheney or someone else as the nominee, Erickson said.

"Because (Bush and Cheney) left a void there, we went all the way back to 2000 and started over again -- a lot of us having the same fights we've had. And we're now in the situation where all the (GOP presidential) candidates, including (Mitt) Romney to a degree, are a bit of a victim of this void that was left by not having an heir," he said.

"I think the Republican Party has yet to reset itself from the Bush years to be able to move forward."

http://www.cnn.com/2012/02/09/politics/conservatives-presidential-race/index.html?c=politics&page=1

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
02-10-2012, 07:56 AM
"I think the Republican Party has yet to reset itself from the Bush years to be able to move forward."



Ha ha ha! :laugh:

Well, I guess the first step is to admit you have a problem...

https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/33442_1661252374600_1335926495_31744194_1904480_n. jpg

barryr
02-10-2012, 08:59 AM
Shocking the liberals didn't even understand the article and the main point being there was no VP or someone high in the chain to run for president once Bush left and having nothing to do with policy or anything the liberals gave blamed Bush for 4 years later. But even with that, having an heir is not all that important since the democrats thought they had someone after Clinton, but we saw how that turned out LOL But I don't expect the liberals around here to get that. It just requires too much thinking.

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
02-10-2012, 09:50 AM
Shocking the liberals didn't even understand the article and the main point being there was no VP or someone high in the chain to run for president once Bush left and having nothing to do with policy or anything the liberals gave blamed Bush for 4 years later.

Huh? You mean the author didn't actually come right out and concede that Bush was a disaster for the GOP?

Color me shocked!

But even with that, having an heir is not all that important since the democrats thought they had someone after Clinton, but we saw how that turned out LOL

Yep, we (read: everyone outside of Bush's lunatic right-wing fringe base) saw two rigged elections.

Odysseus
02-10-2012, 01:54 PM
I don't think a RNC candidate can get elected with the religious right.