Blart
01-05-2012, 12:24 AM
Serious question.
Healthcare reform? I think Romney could have passed the same reform - a right-wing idea after all - much more effectively, since Republicans wouldn't have opposed. There'd be no "constitutional" debate about healthcare mandates (especially since the founding fathers supported healthcare mandates!)
Debt ceiling increase? This probably would have gone smoothly, without the credit downgrade, again thanks to no Republican opposition.
End of Iraq war? Perhaps Obama was a little quicker, but Romney did say he wanted the US out of Afghanistan (of course he changed his mind after the Tea Party, but what hasn't he changed his mind on?)
Bailouts? I say Romney would have jumped at the chance to send taxpayer money to his Wall Street buddies, just like Obama. Remember, we had bailouts in the 1930's. Conservative president Herbert Hoover bailed out his Wall Street buddies, to ill effect (FDR won his presidential campaign with attacks against Hoover's crony-capitalist bailouts, and though FDR increased bailouts - he did it in a drastically different way, by bailing out our economy through smaller main street institutions to a much greater effect)
That's all I got. Am I missing something? What would have been different?
Healthcare reform? I think Romney could have passed the same reform - a right-wing idea after all - much more effectively, since Republicans wouldn't have opposed. There'd be no "constitutional" debate about healthcare mandates (especially since the founding fathers supported healthcare mandates!)
Debt ceiling increase? This probably would have gone smoothly, without the credit downgrade, again thanks to no Republican opposition.
End of Iraq war? Perhaps Obama was a little quicker, but Romney did say he wanted the US out of Afghanistan (of course he changed his mind after the Tea Party, but what hasn't he changed his mind on?)
Bailouts? I say Romney would have jumped at the chance to send taxpayer money to his Wall Street buddies, just like Obama. Remember, we had bailouts in the 1930's. Conservative president Herbert Hoover bailed out his Wall Street buddies, to ill effect (FDR won his presidential campaign with attacks against Hoover's crony-capitalist bailouts, and though FDR increased bailouts - he did it in a drastically different way, by bailing out our economy through smaller main street institutions to a much greater effect)
That's all I got. Am I missing something? What would have been different?
