PDA

View Full Version : reminder: boob mojo in the main forum gets you banned


Pages : [1] 2

Taco John
12-19-2011, 11:16 AM
Given this warning before, and people insist on breaking the rules. We've been lenient in the past, but I'm tired of getting the complaints. Keep it out of the main forum - this is not a porno post.

bronco militia
12-19-2011, 11:19 AM
BOOOOOOOOO!

where are the naked cheerleaders??????!!!!!!!!

TonyR
12-19-2011, 11:21 AM
TJ, can we get some examples of what constitutes "boob mojo"? I think 11 or 12 examples would drive the point home...

Smiling Assassin27
12-19-2011, 11:25 AM
boob mojo, example 1:

http://www.corporateartists.com/images/jerryglanville.jpg

Cutler4Life
12-19-2011, 11:26 AM
Does this also apply to the scantily clad lasses/lads in the birthday threads? I can stop posting those if you like. Also, does this mean starting new threads or posting the stuff during game day threads as well. And finally, does this mean the guys have to take the nearly naked chicks off of their avatars?

canadianbroncosfan
12-19-2011, 11:26 AM
#2

DBruleU
12-19-2011, 11:28 AM
I find it humorous that people use 'boob mojo' to get the team playing well when we have a starting QB who is the exact opposite of anything involving boob's or girls flaunting themselves. Maybe people should start posting pictures of Christ.

Smiling Assassin27
12-19-2011, 11:29 AM
I find it humorous that people use 'boob mojo' to get the team playing well when we have a starting QB who is the exact opposite of anything involving boob's or girls flaunting themselves. Maybe people should start posting pictures of Christ.

google 'Tebow's Girlfriend' and see what comes up, mr. opposite of anything involving boobs or girls flaunting themselves.' ;)

Drew A. Blank
12-19-2011, 11:30 AM
Looks like I picked a bad time to join. Is there an archives?

Spider
12-19-2011, 11:30 AM
I find it humorous that people use 'boob mojo' to get the team playing well when we have a starting QB who is the exact opposite of anything involving boob's or girls flaunting themselves. Maybe people should start posting pictures of Christ.

The God squad is here

canadianbroncosfan
12-19-2011, 11:31 AM
I find it humorous that people use 'boob mojo' to get the team playing well when we have a starting QB who is the exact opposite of anything involving boob's or girls flaunting themselves. Maybe people should start posting pictures of Christ.

Good point

DBruleU
12-19-2011, 11:31 AM
google 'Tebow's Girlfriend' and see what comes up, mr. opposite of anything involving boobs or girls flaunting themselves.' ;)

I've seen it. I don't think that's his GF. But honestly, I highly doubt Tebow goes around gawking at girls.

Spider
12-19-2011, 11:32 AM
Good point

:~ohyah!:

canadianbroncosfan
12-19-2011, 11:32 AM
Does this also apply to the scantily clad lasses/lads in the birthday threads? I can stop posting those if you like. Also, does this mean starting new threads or posting the stuff during game day threads as well. And finally, does this mean the guys have to take the nearly naked chicks off of their avatars?

All joking aside, Miss I has some valid questions.

Smiling Assassin27
12-19-2011, 11:33 AM
I've seen it. I don't think that's his GF. But honestly, I highly doubt Tebow goes around gawking at girls.

I hear ya. I don't either and I'm all for anyone that'd rather break down film than chase skirts and buy a kilo of blow from the Feds.

DBruleU
12-19-2011, 11:34 AM
Does this also apply to the scantily clad lasses/lads in the birthday threads? I can stop posting those if you like. Also, does this mean starting new threads or posting the stuff during game day threads as well. And finally, does this mean the guys have to take the nearly naked chicks off of their avatars?

True.

You can't say no more boobs in game day threads and have guy's with avatars of womens thong clad butts.

Spider
12-19-2011, 11:35 AM
I find it humorous that people use 'boob mojo' to get the team playing well when we have a starting QB who is the exact opposite of anything involving boob's or girls flaunting themselves. Maybe people should start posting pictures of Christ.

dayum it ..... you put me in my place , I feel like a total jerk now ...... Iwont apologize in Private , but will out here , Sorry DBruleU truly meant it

DrFate
12-19-2011, 11:40 AM
The schizo approach of this board always confuses me...

Homophobic comments = fine
cleavage = bad
misogynist comments = fine
daring to say bad things about Blueflame or her buddies = bad/banned/hellfire/damnation
physically threatening other posters = fine
blatant trolls = fine

It's Taco's world, so it's his rules, I suppose...

Taco John
12-19-2011, 11:45 AM
Does this also apply to the scantily clad lasses/lads in the birthday threads? I can stop posting those if you like. Also, does this mean starting new threads or posting the stuff during game day threads as well. And finally, does this mean the guys have to take the nearly naked chicks off of their avatars?

The birthday threads are fine and in context. We don't need scantily dressed women in game threads - they're out of place, they don't belong, they piss people off, especially me. As far as the avatars go, it's the same as ever. Keep it within the lines of decency, but once it reaches vulgar or ponrographic, mods will react.

Taco John
12-19-2011, 11:46 AM
The schizo approach of this board always confuses me...

Homophobic comments = fine
cleavage = bad
misogynist comments = fine
daring to say bad things about Blueflame or her buddies = bad/banned/hellfire/damnation
physically threatening other posters = fine
blatant trolls = fine

It's Taco's world, so it's his rules, I suppose...


You're definitely confused.

DBroncos4life
12-19-2011, 11:49 AM
The schizo approach of this board always confuses me...

Homophobic comments = fine
cleavage = bad
misogynist comments = fine
daring to say bad things about Blueflame or her buddies = bad/banned/hellfire/damnation
physically threatening other posters = fine
blatant trolls = fine

It's Taco's world, so it's his rules, I suppose...

You left off calling the owner a gutless drunk= fine
making the owner look like Hitler= ban

ColoradoDarin
12-19-2011, 11:53 AM
The schizo approach of this board always confuses me...

Homophobic comments = fine
cleavage = bad
misogynist comments = fine
daring to say bad things about Blueflame or her buddies = bad/banned/hellfire/damnation
physically threatening other posters = fine
blatant trolls = fine

It's Taco's world, so it's his rules, I suppose...


All true, but you forgot the:
Thong avs = fine
part

go_broncos
12-19-2011, 11:54 AM
Can you please allow it for 2 weeks. you can ban after we reach playoffs.
couple of years back..you banned it and our team never recovered.

PLEASE ALLOW IT FOR 2 MORE WEEKS..

DrFate
12-19-2011, 11:55 AM
You're definitely confused.

No, I think I got it...

I can use the word gay as a pejorative
I can be a blatant troll
I can discuss the possibility of a poster's menstrual cycle as a way to diminish his/her opinion
I can use female anatomy as a pejorative
I can ridicule the reliigous beliefs of others


I can't post cleavage that i see on the shelf at the checkout line

:thumbsup:

hades
12-19-2011, 11:56 AM
I'm not saying I do or do not agree with the posting pictures rule, but I've wondered about people who do not like to see them, why not also turn off the ability to display them?

You have the option to show or hide various elements of messages, which may be of use to users on slow internet connections, or who want to remove extraneous clutter from posts.
Show Signatures
Show Avatars
Show Images (including attached images and images in [IMG] code)

TheReverend
12-19-2011, 11:57 AM
Is Ned Stark mojo still acceptable?

Example:

http://thronesblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/469461-ned_stark___throne_super.jpg

Taco John
12-19-2011, 12:03 PM
No, I think I got it...

I can use the word gay as a pejorative
I can be a blatant troll
I can discuss the possibility of a poster's menstrual cycle as a way to diminish his/her opinion
I can use female anatomy as a pejorative
I can ridicule the reliigous beliefs of others


I can't post cleavage that i see on the shelf at the checkout line

:thumbsup:

I'm too sick right now to discuss this with a level head, but our ban list is filled with casualties of things you discuss. We're not robots and don't catch everything. Sometimes, indeed, things slip. But we catch plenty.

Shotgun Willie
12-19-2011, 12:10 PM
Sometimes, indeed, things slip.

Shouldn't this be the title of this thread? :wiggle:

DarkHorse
12-19-2011, 12:10 PM
I always miss the boobs - is there a link for examples not to post? ;D

BroncoMan4ever
12-19-2011, 12:12 PM
I've seen it. I don't think that's his GF. But honestly, I highly doubt Tebow goes around gawking at girls.

give me a break on that. Jesus was close with a hooker. i am sure Tebow checks out at least some of the women throwing themselves at him. He may be religious, but he isn't a eunuch

Archer81
12-19-2011, 12:17 PM
Is this considered boob mojo?

http://tinyurl.com/d2lu6fh

:Broncos:

Pick Six
12-19-2011, 12:19 PM
Boob mojo in the game threads? Damn...I might have to read the game threads, once in a while. I never see them, because I'm, like, watching the game...Ha!

Ratboy
12-19-2011, 12:23 PM
Is this considered boob mojo?

http://tinyurl.com/d2lu6fh

:Broncos:

I am highly offended by this.

R U GAY OR SUMTHING?

broncosteven
12-19-2011, 12:23 PM
The birthday threads are fine and in context. We don't need scantily dressed women in game threads - they're out of place, they don't belong, they piss people off, especially me. As far as the avatars go, it's the same as ever. Keep it within the lines of decency, but once it reaches vulgar or ponrographic, mods will react.

So Shirtless Decker in my Gene Kranz B-day card is cool?

http://i235.photobucket.com/albums/ee74/broncosteven/GeneKranzHappyOMBirthday1.png


Just pimping my GK B-day card some more.

Pony Boy
12-19-2011, 12:51 PM
Given this warning before, and people insist on breaking the rules. We've been lenient in the past, but I'm tired of getting the complaints. Keep it out of the main forum - this is not a porno post.

I totaly agree I wouldn't want it any udder way ........

55CrushEm
12-19-2011, 12:55 PM
29796

Boobs McGee
12-19-2011, 01:00 PM
Honest question - what is considered "pornographic"? I don't want to get banned, but I haven't received any warnings for the pictures I've posted. OBVIOUSLY, no nudity, but I wasn't sure where the line was drawn?

Are you referring to this (http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showpost.php?p=3425082&postcount=1509) post from the gameday thread?

In all sincerity I'd like to know.
Thanks.

TheReverend
12-19-2011, 01:07 PM
Honest question - what is considered "pornographic"? I don't want to get banned, but I haven't received any warnings for the pictures I've posted. OBVIOUSLY, no nudity, but I wasn't sure where the line was drawn?

Are you referring to this (http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showpost.php?p=3425082&postcount=1509) post from the gameday thread?

In all sincerity I'd like to know.
Thanks.

^ I hope not because that's just downright impressive.

TonyR
12-19-2011, 01:12 PM
blatant trolls = fine

It's Taco's world, so it's his rules, I suppose...

Yup, there has to be significantly more complaining about trolls than boobs, and rightly so, and yet the trolls are allowed to run wild while the boobs must be banned?!? How can Broncbow be more acceptable than boobs?!? We might have to start an OOM (Occupy Orange Mane) movement! FREE THE BOOBIES!!!

TheReverend
12-19-2011, 01:15 PM
Yup, there has to be significantly more complaining about trolls than boobs, and rightly so, and yet the trolls are allowed to run wild while the boobs must be banned?!? How can Broncbow be more acceptable than boobs?!? We might have to start an OOM (Occupy Orange Mane) movement! FREE THE BOOBIES!!!

I could definitely be wrong because I'm a big thread skimmer, but I genuinely don't see any examples of Broncbow trolling. Being more of a Tebow fan than a Bronco fan =/= trolling.

Quoydogs
12-19-2011, 01:17 PM
Hey my birthday is coming up and if I don't get the birthday girl I'm going to be pissed.

Pony Boy
12-19-2011, 01:18 PM
I liked the Camel Toe-mojo thread better but I guess that's a no-no too .........

canadianbroncosfan
12-19-2011, 01:18 PM
Honest question - what is considered "pornographic"? I don't want to get banned, but I haven't received any warnings for the pictures I've posted. OBVIOUSLY, no nudity, but I wasn't sure where the line was drawn?

Are you referring to this (http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showpost.php?p=3425082&postcount=1509) post from the gameday thread?

In all sincerity I'd like to know.
Thanks.

I hope not either, that's not offensive, that is IMPRESSIVE. I wonder what they're listening too?

canadianbroncosfan
12-19-2011, 01:19 PM
Hey my birthday is coming up and if I don't get the birthday girl I'm going to be pissed.

Taco already said birthday boobies are okay

TheReverend
12-19-2011, 01:19 PM
I hope not either, that's not offensive, that is IMPRESSIVE. I wonder what they're listening too?

I would assume Dolly Parton.

BroncoMan4ever
12-19-2011, 01:20 PM
I hope not either, that's not offensive, that is IMPRESSIVE. I wonder what they're listening too?

hopefully something with some bass to make those babies bounce.

gunns
12-19-2011, 01:22 PM
Is this considered boob mojo?

http://tinyurl.com/d2lu6fh

:Broncos:

Oh please no.

canadianbroncosfan
12-19-2011, 01:25 PM
hopefully something with some bass to make those babies bounce.

:yayaya:

gunns
12-19-2011, 01:25 PM
Hey my birthday is coming up and if I don't get the birthday girl I'm going to be pissed.

Oh hell I'd rather see boobs than that profile pic you've got. Damn!

Happy early birthday and I hope you get a pelethora of boobs.

McDman
12-19-2011, 01:27 PM
I could definitely be wrong because I'm a big thread skimmer, but I genuinely don't see any examples of Broncbow trolling. Being more of a Tebow fan than a Bronco fan =/= trolling.

You must have missed his giant posts about religion and purposely posting nonsense to get attention.

But really? Who would take the time to report pictures of women being posted. It's just like neg repping, totally ridiculous.

DHallblows
12-19-2011, 01:28 PM
You must have missed his giant posts about religion and purposely posting nonsense to get attention.

But really? Who would take the time to report pictures of women being posted. It's just like neg repping, totally ridiculous.

negged

canadianbroncosfan
12-19-2011, 01:30 PM
You must have missed his giant posts about religion and purposely posting nonsense to get attention.

But really? Who would take the time to report pictures of women being posted. It's just like neg repping, totally ridiculous.

I concur, you need to find the "Will Elway shake Obama's hand" thread.

RhymesayersDU
12-19-2011, 01:33 PM
But really? Who would take the time to report pictures of women being posted. It's just like neg repping, totally ridiculous.

It's the same people who take themselves and this board way too seriously. Keep an eye out, it's easy to tell.

BroncoBen
12-19-2011, 01:35 PM
The birthday threads are fine and in context. We don't need scantily dressed women in game threads - they're out of place, they don't belong, they piss people off, especially me. As far as the avatars go, it's the same as ever. Keep it within the lines of decency, but once it reaches vulgar or ponrographic, mods will react.

I can live with that.. in fact I propose take it one step further.. no pics at all on 'Game Day' threads period. Some pics do get out of hand in terms of size and content.

But I do have to caution about the 'interpretation' of what is considered vulgar or pornographic.

Speaking for myself, my avatars are just me being 'juvenile' and having fun, not meant to offend anyone.

Agamemnon
12-19-2011, 01:42 PM
Well, so much for the playoffs... ;)

canadianbroncosfan
12-19-2011, 01:44 PM
I can live with that.. in fact I propose take it one step further.. no pics at all on 'Game Day' threads period. Some pics do get out of hand in terms of size and content.

But I do have to caution about the 'interpretation' of what is considered vulgar or pornographic.

Speaking for myself, my avatars are just me being 'juvenile' and having fun, not meant to offend anyone.

I also find your avatar unoffensive.

McDman
12-19-2011, 01:45 PM
I can live with that.. in fact I propose take it one step further.. no pics at all on 'Game Day' threads period. Some pics do get out of hand in terms of size and content.

But I do have to caution about the 'interpretation' of what is considered vulgar or pornographic.

Speaking for myself, my avatars are just me being 'juvenile' and having fun, not meant to offend anyone.

That may be the best avatar I have ever laid my eyes on.

Rabb
12-19-2011, 01:46 PM
TJ is tearing this site apart!!!

oubronco
12-19-2011, 01:47 PM
I liked the Camel Toe-mojo thread better but I guess that's a no-no too .........

Amen ;D

Shotgun Willie
12-19-2011, 01:51 PM
TJ is a gutless drunk.

go_broncos
12-19-2011, 01:54 PM
TJ - you are making a mistake. If you are a true fan, don't do it

Old Dude
12-19-2011, 02:00 PM
This is about as much boob mojo as you're going to get.

That One Guy
12-19-2011, 02:03 PM
I propose you ditch the entire mod-staff and replace them with those pictures you don't want to see.

Put up a poll of "Which is worse: Mods or nipples?" and mods would win hands down.

You have one guy with a blatant "The ****" (without stars) on his avatar picture and noone gives a damn. Meanwhile people are getting banned for stupid things. There's enough boobs on the site that I always had to disable all images when surfing from work yet you want it to be a family site. Mod your forums or you'll lose them, simple as that.

DarkHorse
12-19-2011, 02:14 PM
Which is worse - trolls, err BLATANT trolls rather or boobs?


Blatant trolls

Boobs

Blatant trolls

Boobs


Hmmm, doesn't seem like such a difficult decision but eh, what do I know.

Meck77
12-19-2011, 02:16 PM
Personally I don't care either way but Taco I think you have lost touch with the core of your community on this one.

The NFL caters to mostly men. NFL cheerleaders wear next to nothing at the games. The orangemane caters to the same men the NFL does. The orangemane bills itself as the online tailgate that never ends. Half naked women are part of the game day experience. They are on the sidelines, they are on the jumbo tron, they are walking around the tailgate scene.

Taco you might need to change the orangemane to "Sorta like the tailgate that never ends for married men with kids". ;D

Popps
12-19-2011, 02:16 PM
Let me make this simple for those who can't understand Taco's easy to understand logic...

If you've got kids, you probably don't want to be unknowingly clicking on threads with strippers 69'ing each other as your kids walk up behind you.

Conversely, if you've got kids... you're already getting laid so posting boob pics is probably not a necessary part of your day.

On top of that, if you've got kids... and you're getting laid... you've probably got a job.

Guess what else you don't want popping up on your computer screen if you have a job that allows you to check football scores and related material?

All make sense?

Get a job, get laid... and you won't need boob pics on a football forum to get through your day.

DrFate
12-19-2011, 02:21 PM
Let me make this simple for those who can't understand Taco's easy to understand logic...


User CP | Edit Options | Visible Post Elements

Show Signatures
Show Avatars
Show Images (including attached images and images in [IMG] code)

canadianbroncosfan
12-19-2011, 02:22 PM
Let me make this simple for those who can't understand Taco's easy to understand logic...

If you've got kids, you probably don't want to be unknowingly clicking on threads with strippers 69'ing each other as your kids walk up behind you.

Conversely, if you've got kids... you're already getting laid so posting boob pics is probably not a necessary part of your day.

On top of that, if you've got kids... and you're getting laid... you've probably got a job.

Guess what else you don't want popping up on your computer screen if you have a job that allows you to check football scores and related material?

All make sense?

Get a job, get laid... and you won't need boob pics on a football forum to get through your day.

As much as I'm guilty for posting boob mojo (I didn't know the mods frowned upon it) these are all very reasonable explanations.

TonyR
12-19-2011, 02:23 PM
...but I genuinely don't see any examples of Broncbow trolling...

I bet if there's a stat for "person put on ignore the most in the last month" he'd be leading by wide margin, if that counts for anything.

DrFate
12-19-2011, 02:24 PM
I bet if there's a stat for "person put on ignore the most in the last month" he'd be leading by wide margin, if that counts for anything.

He went on my ignore list after about a half-dozen posts. There simply isn't anything redeeming in his posts.

I'd put Blueflame right next to him, but apparently you can't put a mod on ignore. :wiggle:

DarkHorse
12-19-2011, 02:27 PM
User CP | Edit Options | Visible Post Elements

Show Signatures
Show Avatars
Show Images (including attached images and images in [IMG] code)

You're asking people to actually make changes to their profile so these offending pictures don't show up? Shame on you, don't you know it's better to get on your soapbox and preach to people not to do these things?


C'mon man, this is the US of A - we don't change the channel when we don't like the programming, we lobby to take the program off the air.

Taco John
12-19-2011, 02:29 PM
Let me make this simple for those who can't understand Taco's easy to understand logic...

If you've got kids, you probably don't want to be unknowingly clicking on threads with strippers 69'ing each other as your kids walk up behind you.

Conversely, if you've got kids... you're already getting laid so posting boob pics is probably not a necessary part of your day.

On top of that, if you've got kids... and you're getting laid... you've probably got a job.

Guess what else you don't want popping up on your computer screen if you have a job that allows you to check football scores and related material?

All make sense?

Get a job, get laid... and you won't need boob pics on a football forum to get through your day.


It really is this simple.

I'd go into it in more detail, but I've got the flu right now, and I really can't say it any better than what Popps just said.

Popps
12-19-2011, 02:29 PM
User CP | Edit Options | Visible Post Elements

Show Signatures
Show Avatars
Show Images (including attached images and images in [IMG] code)

Oh, I got it.... so, I shouldn't be able to ever see football-related or work-safe images because 4 jagovs can't get laid and have to post boob pics all day on a site that's clearly denoted as a family-friendly, football-related site?

Thanks for clearing it up.

DarkHorse
12-19-2011, 02:30 PM
He went on my ignore list after about a half-dozen posts. There simply isn't anything redeeming in his posts.

I'd put Blueflame right next to him, but apparently you can't put a mod on ignore. :wiggle:


Are there seriously mods here on this site? Long as i've been here I thought it was just Taco.

Really? There's mods? ROFLMAO - what do they do here? Yeah, this is a serious question.

I'm a mod on a couple of our local car racing forums and I can tell you that it keeps me very busy some days - no way half of the trolls or dumbass topics would fly on my watch. Some of the threads, in an over abundance, are so ridiculous I thought it was because there were no mods here.

Really? Mods? Here on the O-mane?

Wow

DrFate
12-19-2011, 02:30 PM
You're asking people to actually make changes to their profile so these offending pictures don't show up? Shame on you, don't you know it's better to get on your soapbox and preach to people not to do these things?


C'mon man, this is the US of A - we don't change the channel when we don't like the programming, we lobby to take the program off the air.

;D

I guess I'm the sucker who simply changes the channel (or refuses to pay for a pay-channel when I have issues with their content).

This forum has problems (as all forums do) - the cleavage from the game thread isn't in my top five, honestly. Start with a troll hunt and at least discourage all the hateful comments. Then we can talk about the lovely ladies and their 'appropriateness'.

Popps
12-19-2011, 02:31 PM
It really is this simple.

I got burned by this **** last week in an unmarked thread. ("Let's get this started.") Had to try to explain to my 5 year old what she saw. Not a comfortable situation. So, I'm sort of glad to see you addressing this.

But, like you said... this couldn't be much more simple.

DrFate
12-19-2011, 02:32 PM
Oh, I got it.... so, I shouldn't be able to ever see football-related or work-safe images because 4 jagovs can't get laid and have to post boob pics all day on a site that's clearly denoted as a family-friendly, football-related site?

Typical Popps response. Uhh

If you have any issue with the visual content of this board related to shoulder surfers, I am merely demonstrating that it can be regulated on a personal basis.

And you can put the 'family friendly' label on this board when the mods deal with the homophobic comments, the misogynist comments, and the downright hateful comments.

DarkHorse
12-19-2011, 02:34 PM
;D

I guess I'm the sucker who simply changes the channel (or refuses to pay for a pay-channel when I have issues with their content).

This forum has problems (as all forums do) - the cleavage from the game thread isn't in my top five, honestly. Start with a troll hunt and at least discourage all the hateful comments. Then we can talk about the lovely ladies and their 'appropriateness'.


These 2 reasons highlighted are what have me questioning whether there are really mods on this site.

I'll take boobs over some of the stuff i've actually read/seen posted here.


Again - wow, on the boob witchhunt while letting all the other crap slide.

Popps
12-19-2011, 02:35 PM
Really? Mods? Here on the O-mane?

Wow

I've offered Taco my services. The upside is, I would mod.

The downside (?) is that we'd have the user-base pared down to about 50-100 people within a few days. So, depending on how you look at that...

DrFate
12-19-2011, 02:36 PM
Had to try to explain to my 5 year old what she saw. Not a comfortable situation. So, I'm sort of glad to see you addressing this.

But, like you said... this couldn't be much more simple.

I'd like to know how you explain to a kid the 'sand in the vagina' comments or the 'wow, that is so gay' comments or the 'are you on the rag?' comments?

I'm not sure how any of the above is 'family friendly' (to use your term)

To say nothing of implied physical threats, ridiculing another's faith, etc. Stuff that happens on a daily basis.

Popps
12-19-2011, 02:37 PM
Typical Popps response. Uhh

If you have any issue with the visual content of this board related to shoulder surfers, I am merely demonstrating that it can be regulated on a personal basis.

And you can put the 'family friendly' label on this board when the mods deal with the homophobic comments, the misogynist comments, and the downright hateful comments.

Without hand-holding all day long, it seems to me that they do try to draw lines with that kind of stuff. I've seen people banned for those kinds of things.

The other issue is, someone can't walk up behind you at work and necessarily tell what you're reading about in one glance. Whereas, with images... it can easily be seen by the wrong eyes.

Honestly, anyone who doesn't get this is either just not very bright or being purposely obtuse.

Luckily, Taco's a smart enough dude to take care of it properly.

Shotgun Willie
12-19-2011, 02:38 PM
I got burned by this **** last week in an unmarked thread. ("Let's get this started.") Had to try to explain to my 5 year old what she saw. Not a comfortable situation. So, I'm sort of glad to see you addressing this.

That's nothing. It's not like you had to explain why you were looking at shirtless pictures of Rev humping an inflatable lobster, up on your 100 inch wall screen when your in laws walked in.

DarkHorse
12-19-2011, 02:38 PM
I've offered Taco my services. The upside is, I would mod.

The downside (?) is that we'd have the user-base pared down to about 50-100 people within a few days. So, depending on how you look at that...

Sorry Popps, I don't see a downside at this stage of the O-mane. This site is in DIRE need of active Moderators.

Not meant to be a slight at the current mods? But the fact is, the invisibility of these "mods" are what caused me to believe we didn't even have any!

DrFate
12-19-2011, 02:39 PM
The other issue is, someone can't walk up behind you at work and necessarily tell what you're reading about in one glance. Whereas, with images... it can easily be seen by the wrong eyes.


I'm not sure what part of 'if you are worried about the images, turn them off' you are missing here...

The cleavage on this board isn't any more severe than that seen at the game (and such activity is encouraged).

The comments I see on this board would get you thrown out of an NFL game.

Pick Six
12-19-2011, 02:40 PM
The hateful comments ARE a problem. However...Pictures, by definition, are visual. Kids (and co-workers) would see the near-nekkid women before reading the comments. That's the point...

Old Dude
12-19-2011, 02:41 PM
Typical Popps response. Uhh

If you have any issue with the visual content of this board related to shoulder surfers, I am merely demonstrating that it can be regulated on a personal basis.

And you can put the 'family friendly' label on this board when the mods deal with the homophobic comments, the misogynist comments, and the downright hateful comments.

This is a free site and the mods are volunteers. Part time volunteers. I have better things to do than to spend all day patroling threads in search of violations.

If you guys are offended by something, all you have to do is to report the post, and, when we get a chance, we'll take a look at it and decide what to do.

If that's not good enough, then just leave and don't let the door hit you on the way out.

ant1999e
12-19-2011, 02:41 PM
I'm not saying I do or do not agree with the posting pictures rule, but I've wondered about people who do not like to see them, why not also turn off the ability to display them?

You have the option to show or hide various elements of messages, which may be of use to users on slow internet connections, or who want to remove extraneous clutter from posts.
Show Signatures
Show Avatars
Show Images (including attached images and images in [IMG] code)

This.:thumbsup:

Popps
12-19-2011, 02:42 PM
I'd like to know how you explain to a kid the 'sand in the vagina' comments or the 'wow, that is so gay' comments or the 'are you on the rag?' comments?

I'm not sure how any of the above is 'family friendly' (to use your term)

To say nothing of implied physical threats, ridiculing another's faith, etc. Stuff that happens on a daily basis.

Again, a kid can't glance over from 5' away and decipher the tone of several sentences.

One can EASILY glance over to see softcore porn images on a screen and come away with questions.

See the difference? Tiny words on a tiny screen from a long distance.... and giant porn images.

I mean, you either understand that or you're a complete idiot. I doubt it's the latter... so just stop.

DarkHorse
12-19-2011, 02:43 PM
I'm not sure what part of 'if you are worried about the images, turn them off' you are missing here...

The cleavage on this board isn't any more severe than that seen at the game (and such activity is encouraged).

The comments I see on this board would get you thrown out of an NFL game.

The comments i've read, along with the misuse of thread creating ability (repeatedly) would just net you a lifetime ban on our forums.

We ARE family oriented and we have password protected "adult" themed sections where 'boob' pictures and other NSFW stuff is posted. Maybe that can be implemented here?

That way you can't have people cry about boobs - it's your option to go into that section. Violators outside of that section get a long vacation.

It really is - AS SIMPLE AS THAT.

DrFate
12-19-2011, 02:43 PM
If that's not good enough, then just leave and don't let the door hit you on the way out.

'friendly' indeed...

Popps
12-19-2011, 02:44 PM
I'm not sure what part of 'if you are worried about the images, turn them off' you are missing here...

The cleavage on this board isn't any more severe than that seen at the game (and such activity is encouraged).

The comments I see on this board would get you thrown out of an NFL game.

And for the 5th time.... any non-impaired adult brain knows why an image presents a more harmful (potential) consequence to a young mind or a co-worker than small, difficult to read from a distance text. You can't possibly be unable to understand this, so I'll assume you just like to argue at this point.

Should we fix hate-talk here? Sure, I've always said families are off-limits.

Beyond that... is a simple/black-white issue and it's been solved.

DrFate
12-19-2011, 02:46 PM
Again, a kid can't glance over from 5' away and decipher the tone of several sentences.

Again, I'm not sure what you are missing here. Parents are responsible for what their kid sees - so they change the channel. If you are worried about what your children see (and I give you props for doing so) then you should turn off the pictures and the avatars. I didn't see anything on the NE gameday thread that was 'more offensive' than the avatars we see every day.

broncocalijohn
12-19-2011, 02:50 PM
Given this warning before, and people insist on breaking the rules. We've been lenient in the past, but I'm tired of getting the complaints. Keep it out of the main forum - this is not a porno post.

Well, we just started our 2008 season of week 15 (13th game) all over again. Couldn't wait until after the season TJ? Now we are going to see the Chargers take the division. Don't tempt fate.

DrFate
12-19-2011, 02:50 PM
And for the 5th time.... any non-impaired adult brain knows why an image presents a more harmful (potential) consequence to a young mind or a co-worker than small, difficult to read from a distance text. You can't possibly be unable to understand this, so I'll assume you just like to argue at this point.

Should we fix hate-talk here? Sure, I've always said families are off-limits.

Beyond that... is a simple/black-white issue and it's been solved.

You really hurt any credibility you have with the needless insults and ad hominem. I said, in my first or second post 'it's Taco's world'. It just amazes me that the hateful comments are fine but a chick in a bikini is 'offensive'.

It's a privately owned forum and I certainly do not dispute Isaac's right to impose whatever rules he chooses. (quite the opposite)

McDman
12-19-2011, 02:52 PM
Be careful what you wish for with asking for more mods.

On the other site I made fun of some kid's jorts and got banned because of it.

Tombstone RJ
12-19-2011, 02:53 PM
I like boobs, I like T&A but I don't think it belongs here. But I do like them. But they don't belong here. But I like them... but, but, but...

McDman
12-19-2011, 02:53 PM
Be careful what you wish for with asking for more mods.

On the other site I made fun of some kid's jorts and got banned because of it.

Lycan
12-19-2011, 02:53 PM
So, the message here is no pictures right?

So haikus about boobs would be fine?

broncocalijohn
12-19-2011, 02:54 PM
The hateful comments ARE a problem. However...Pictures, by definition, are visual. Kids (and co-workers) would see the near-nekkid women before reading the comments. That's the point...

TJ cannot ban hateful comments or there would be one less person to do the podcast.:thanku:

TDmvp
12-19-2011, 02:58 PM
So am I still aloud to post Renee Herlocker cheerleader pics in the game day thread ?

TDmvp
12-19-2011, 03:00 PM
Again, I'm not sure what you are missing here. Parents are responsible for what their kid sees - so they change the channel. If you are worried about what your children see (and I give you props for doing so) then you should turn off the pictures and the avatars. I didn't see anything on the NE gameday thread that was 'more offensive' than the avatars we see every day.

Shhh or they'll ban us from having avatars next like they did with sigs because sigs had to much skin.

houghtam
12-19-2011, 03:05 PM
If we're going to get rid of the posting of scantily clad women (which I don't have a problem with), I would like to see that go from the avatars, as well. I don't disable avatars simply because it makes it a hell of a lot easier to determine pretty quickly who's posting. But I think it's a double standard to have rules against that, but then have people like BroncoMan4ever, ShutDownPoster, Jetmeck, Bronclvr, Boobs McGee, TonyR, Drunk Monkey, BroncoBen and many more posting scantily clad or sexually suggestive material in their avatars. Even the relatively tame avatars of some of the female community members like Blueflame and Broncochica have raised eyebrows of people standing behind me. That's the unfortunate problem and burden of censorship...once you open that floodgate, it's very difficult to keep it under control without alienating one group or another. I say if you're going to hold people to one standard, it should be enforced uniformly.

As to OldDude's post about hateful comments:

If you guys are offended by something, all you have to do is to report the post, and, when we get a chance, we'll take a look at it and decide what to do.

If modding is such a chore, then I think it would behoove the mods for whom it is such a chore to step down in favor of people who will actually do the work. And if that's all it takes is reporting posts, then you can plan on getting a lot more reports from me about some of the hateful things that are posted in threads.

McDman
12-19-2011, 03:07 PM
If we're going to get rid of the posting of scantily clad women (which I don't have a problem with), I would like to see that go from the avatars, as well. I don't disable avatars simply because it makes it a hell of a lot easier to determine pretty quickly who's posting. But I think it's a double standard to have rules against that, but then have people like BroncoMan4ever, ShutDownPoster, Jetmeck, Bronclvr, Boobs McGee, TonyR, Drunk Monkey, BroncoBen and many more posting scantily clad or sexually suggestive material in their avatars. Even the relatively tame avatars of some of the female community members like Blueflame and Broncochica have raised eyebrows of people standing behind me. That's the unfortunate problem and burden of censorship...once you open that floodgate, it's very difficult to keep it under control without alienating one group or another. I say if you're going to hold people to one standard, it should be enforced uniformly.

As to OldDude's post about hateful comments:



If modding is such a chore, then I think it would behoove the mods for whom it is such a chore to step down in favor of people who will actually do the work. And if that's all it takes is reporting posts, then you can plan on getting a lot more reports from me about some of the hateful things that are posted in threads.

I hope my dog on cocaine doesn't offend anyone!

houghtam
12-19-2011, 03:08 PM
I hope my dog on cocaine doesn't offend anyone!

Even if it's a female dog, the cocaine sufficiently covers up her **** and *****.

Meck77
12-19-2011, 03:10 PM
Oh, I got it.... so, I shouldn't be able to ever see football-related or work-safe images because 4 jagovs can't get laid and have to post boob pics all day on a site that's clearly denoted as a family-friendly, football-related site?

Thanks for clearing it up.

Popps I hear what you are saying and understand your position with being married and not wanting your kids to see half naked chicks on daddys screen. However, the employer in me really doubts that your boss is willingly paying you to debate whether or not you should be seeing boobs on a football forum or not.

Sorry dude. The whole "I should be able to surf at work argument is pretty weak IMO". People shouldn't get paid to surf! There is no way in hell you would pay someone to surf the orangemane Popps. I just don't believe it.

Hell I've been self employed ever since the Mane started and I sometimes feel guilty for even being on here during business hours. I consider myself a casual user with only 20,000 posts in decade but I'll be honest. I've wasted a **** ton of time in here during work hours so I know all you fools have on your bosses dime! Ha!

Archer81
12-19-2011, 03:11 PM
This thread is taking unexpected turns.

I'm waiting for white gorillas to come out protecting diamonds any moment.

:Broncos:

McDman
12-19-2011, 03:12 PM
This thread is taking unexpected turns.

I'm waiting for white gorillas to come out protecting diamonds any moment.

:Broncos:

"Amy, good gorilla."

Atwater His Ass
12-19-2011, 03:14 PM
I don't smoke, so instead I take 5 min breaks here and there at work and on some of those I surf the net, check personal e-mail, blah blah blah. There are a million legitimate reasons someone may be browsing the mane at work.

Anyway, I just fine the whole boob/avatar thing immature and cliche. Who needs to see some chick in a bikini when you can spend about 5 secs to find all the free porn you want anyway.

Rohirrim
12-19-2011, 03:15 PM
Does this apply to butt mojo?






I keed. I keed. Get well, TJ. :thumbs:

McDman
12-19-2011, 03:17 PM
I don't smoke, so instead I take 5 min breaks here and there at work and on some of those I surf the net, check personal e-mail, blah blah blah. There are a million legitimate reasons someone may be browsing the mane at work.

Anyway, I just fine the whole boob/avatar thing immature and cliche. Who needs to see some chick in a bikini when you can spend about 5 secs to find all the free porn you want anyway.

Wait, the internet has porn on it?!

Archer81
12-19-2011, 03:19 PM
Is my new avy ok?

:Broncos:

TDmvp
12-19-2011, 03:19 PM
Out fear of being banned for speaking up I've kept my mouth "mostly" shut about this.

But here goes ...

T.J. I have 0 issue with any of your rules . If you want to reissue the warning about pics of chicks on the main page that's your call. Your house , your rules...


What I do have issue with is the fact that if a person is in the OM clique they get to break said rules and from what I can tell have zero ramifications beside a mod telling me I spoke to them and it will be taken care of. Sorry not fair. They should be banned like anyone else.

I've seen members of the clique wish death on people , use personal info from facebooks and other sites to belittle and insult someone among other things and never receive a ban even if the post is reported.

If you are going to force rules on people and expect us to respect this place and the rules , you should at least enforce them evenly and no matter who broke said rule.

But I bit my lip on this for months now out of fear I'd be banned cause I'm not one of the boards favs but o well .

If there's going to be rules I would at least like to see them upheld no matter who breaks them.

Archer81
12-19-2011, 03:23 PM
Out fear of being banned for speaking up I've kept my mouth "mostly" shut about this.

But here goes ...

T.J. I have 0 issue with any of your rules . If you want to reissue the warning about pics of chicks on the main page that's your call. Your house , your rules...


What I do have issue with is the fact that if a person is in the OM clique they get to break said rules and from what I can tell have zero ramifications beside a mod telling me I spoke to them and it will be taken care . Sorry not fair. They should be banned like anyone else.

I've seen members of the clique wish death on people , use personal info from facebooks and other sites to belittle and insult someone among other things and never receive a ban even if the post is reported.

If you are going to force rules on people and expect us to respect this place and the rules , you should at least use enforce them evenly and no matter who broke said rule.

But I bit my lip on this for months now out of fear I'd be banned cause I'm not one of the boards favs but o well .

If there's going to be rules I would at least like to see them upheld no matter who breaks them.



http://tinyurl.com/23wtteo

:Broncos:

TDmvp
12-19-2011, 03:24 PM
http://tinyurl.com/23wtteo

:Broncos:

LOL yea I know ...

oubronco
12-19-2011, 03:24 PM
http://images.cheezburger.com/completestore/2011/4/22/018dd96f-a0d2-4dab-90e9-5126a191e907.jpg

cutthemdown
12-19-2011, 03:25 PM
Out fear of being banned for speaking up I've kept my mouth "mostly" shut about this.

But here goes ...

T.J. I have 0 issue with any of your rules . If you want to reissue the warning about pics of chicks on the main page that's your call. Your house , your rules...


What I do have issue with is the fact that if a person is in the OM clique they get to break said rules and from what I can tell have zero ramifications beside a mod telling me I spoke to them and it will be taken care . Sorry not fair. They should be banned like anyone else.

I've seen members of the clique wish death on people , use personal info from facebooks and other sites to belittle and insult someone among other things and never receive a ban even if the post is reported.

If you are going to force rules on people and expect us to respect this place and the rules , you should at least enforce them evenly and no matter who broke said rule.

But I bit my lip on this for months now out of fear I'd be banned cause I'm not one of the boards favs but o well .

If there's going to be rules I would at least like to see them upheld no matter who breaks them.


this!

cmhargrove
12-19-2011, 03:25 PM
In all seriousness.

We do like to have fun, but I don't want to do what is inappropriate. I really need some guidelines as to what is appropriate here. If we post pics of the Denver Broncos cheerleaders and they have serious cleavage, is that a boob foul?

I'm not trying to give a hard time TJ, but I do need some guidance. Can you get any more specific on what is fair, and what is foul?

DBroncos4life
12-19-2011, 03:27 PM
Typical Popps response. Uhh

If you have any issue with the visual content of this board related to shoulder surfers, I am merely demonstrating that it can be regulated on a personal basis.

And you can put the 'family friendly' label on this board when the mods deal with the homophobic comments, the misogynist comments, and the downright hateful comments.

It's funny the mods tell us to just put trolls on ignore if we don't like what they have to say. I think if the posters that cry about the pictures can turn that off then the the mods should just tell those posters the same damn thing.

McDman
12-19-2011, 03:29 PM
Out fear of being banned for speaking up I've kept my mouth "mostly" shut about this.

But here goes ...

T.J. I have 0 issue with any of your rules . If you want to reissue the warning about pics of chicks on the main page that's your call. Your house , your rules...


What I do have issue with is the fact that if a person is in the OM clique they get to break said rules and from what I can tell have zero ramifications beside a mod telling me I spoke to them and it will be taken care . Sorry not fair. They should be banned like anyone else.

I've seen members of the clique wish death on people , use personal info from facebooks and other sites to belittle and insult someone among other things and never receive a ban even if the post is reported.

If you are going to force rules on people and expect us to respect this place and the rules , you should at least enforce them evenly and no matter who broke said rule.

But I bit my lip on this for months now out of fear I'd be banned cause I'm not one of the boards favs but o well .

If there's going to be rules I would at least like to see them upheld no matter who breaks them.

I got banned last week for starting a boob mojo thread. TJ was nice enough to lift it because I had zero idea it was against the rules. As long as I've been here I don't remember anyone getting in trouble for that.

Oh well, hopefully it doesn't turn iinto the denverbroncos.com site, that place was miserable. Part of the reason I love this site are the guaranteed and epic meltdowns that happen every other month.

Pony Boy
12-19-2011, 03:29 PM
I got two words for you Taco ....

Flu Shot

Archer81
12-19-2011, 03:31 PM
So...

No wang mojo threads? That's orientationist.

:Broncos:

RhymesayersDU
12-19-2011, 03:31 PM
My God you people are morons.

Popps ended this thread a page ago, but leave it to the idiots to complain about 50 other things, ask for obscure clarifications, etc.

We don't need more mods, we don't need more rules, we need less idiots. Boo hoo, somebody called somebody gay. Boo hoo, somebody said "on the rag." Boo hoo somebody wasn't banned. Life isn't fair. Grow up.

If you can't live without boob images, you need to reassess your life.

Powderaddict
12-19-2011, 03:31 PM
Let me make this simple for those who can't understand Taco's easy to understand logic...

If you've got kids, you probably don't want to be unknowingly clicking on threads with strippers 69'ing each other as your kids walk up behind you.

Conversely, if you've got kids... you're already getting laid so posting boob pics is probably not a necessary part of your day.

On top of that, if you've got kids... and you're getting laid... you've probably got a job.

Guess what else you don't want popping up on your computer screen if you have a job that allows you to check football scores and related material?

All make sense?

Get a job, get laid... and you won't need boob pics on a football forum to get through your day.

This was well put.

Plus, who doesn't have a smartphone these days? If you need a boob fix, you're only about 15 seconds away from typing "boobs" into google images :wiggle:

Archer81
12-19-2011, 03:32 PM
My God you people are morons.

Popps ended this thread a page ago, but leave it to the idiots to complain about 50 other things, ask for obscure clarifications, etc.

We don't need more mods, we don't need more rules, we need less idiots. Boo hoo, somebody called somebody gay. Boo hoo, somebody said "on the rag." Boo hoo somebody wasn't banned. Life isn't fair. Grow up.

If you can't live without boob images, you need to reassess your life.


TL,DR. Lulz.

:Broncos:

Powderaddict
12-19-2011, 03:34 PM
Be careful what you wish for with asking for more mods.

On the other site I made fun of some kid's jorts and got banned because of it.

haha, I got banned for suggesting some of the mods are a bit touchy for being wrong about Orton LOL

More mods is definately not the answer!

Archer81
12-19-2011, 03:37 PM
Adults need to police themselves. I could care less if someone throws around fag or what have you. Its just words on a message board. I also do not care if someone wants to have semi naked chicks in their avatars. However, this is not my site. It's TJ's. If he does not want chest cushion mojo threads, thats cool. He expects us to moderate ourselves. If you post something and think "hey, this might not be cool" then it probably isnt. Don't post it.

Gawd...

:Broncos:

TheReverend
12-19-2011, 03:39 PM
What a fun thread.

DrFate
12-19-2011, 03:41 PM
Boo hoo, somebody called somebody gay. Boo hoo, somebody said "on the rag." Boo hoo somebody wasn't banned. Life isn't fair. Grow up.

Thank you for putting it in a context I couldn't.

I can offend any number of groups with truly offensive and hateful comments and the outcome is 'grow up'. I can literally insult someone's ethnicity, orientation, gender and religion in a personal context and 'life isn't fair' is your retort.

But when someone posts an image of cleavage, the same that we see on the cover of SI or on the sideline of every game in orange and blue - that's bannable.

Where are the priorities, exactly?

Popps
12-19-2011, 03:42 PM
You really hurt any credibility you have with the needless insults and ad hominem. I said, in my first or second post 'it's Taco's world'. It just amazes me that the hateful comments are fine but a chick in a bikini is 'offensive'.

It's a privately owned forum and I certainly do not dispute Isaac's right to impose whatever rules he chooses. (quite the opposite)

Again, no one has claimed that hateful comments are fine. You are creating a straw man and then attacking it.

I'm not insulting you, either. I simply said you're not an idiot, so I'm sure you understand the simple subject matter here.

McDman
12-19-2011, 03:43 PM
What a fun thread.

Your avatar offends mine eyes.

TheReverend
12-19-2011, 03:44 PM
Thank you for putting it in a context I couldn't.

I can offend any number of groups with truly offensive and hateful comments and the outcome is 'grow up'. I can literally insult someone's ethnicity, orientation, gender and religion in a personal context and 'life isn't fair' is your retort.

But when someone posts an image of cleavage, the same that we see on the cover of SI or on the sideline of every game in orange and blue - that's bannable.

Where are the priorities, exactly?

Here's the part that I think you're missing bud:













Who cares.

DrFate
12-19-2011, 03:45 PM
Again, no one has claimed that hateful comments are fine.

I see hateful comments in almost EVERY thread on this board. They are certainly tolerated, whether they are 'fine' or not.

I'm an adult, I ignore them. Or I put those people on ignore. The fact that that is ignored while the topic of this thread is the 'priority' is confusing to me if the intent is a 'family friendly' environment.

Popps
12-19-2011, 03:45 PM
Where are the priorities, exactly?

See Taco's first post. He made it really easy to understand. It's a football forum, so he's requesting the porn be left to the porn forums.

Crazy concept to get one's mind around, I know...

McDman
12-19-2011, 03:45 PM
Again, no one has claimed that hateful comments are fine. You are creating a straw man and then attacking it.

I'm not insulting you, either. I simply said you're not an idiot, so I'm sure you understand the simple subject matter here.

Can we ban the words "straw man""projecting", "witch hunt", etc... pretty much anything MacG uses?

Popps
12-19-2011, 03:49 PM
Can we ban the words "straw man""projecting", "witch hunt", etc... pretty much anything MacG uses?

He's on ignore. I wouldn't have known he used it.

Sub false premise.

Popps
12-19-2011, 03:50 PM
I see hateful comments in almost EVERY thread on this board. They are certainly tolerated, whether they are 'fine' or not.

I'm an adult, I ignore them. Or I put those people on ignore. The fact that that is ignored while the topic of this thread is the 'priority' is confusing to me if the intent is a 'family friendly' environment.

Report them if they offend you. I'm sure mods will look into it.

Once again, if you're "confused" as to why porn pics aren't allowed on the main pages of an all-ages football forum... it's probably not the forum that needs help.

TDmvp
12-19-2011, 03:53 PM
You left off calling the owner a gutless drunk= fine
making the owner look like Hitler= ban

:spit:

/whistles ...

Los Broncos
12-19-2011, 03:53 PM
Boobs gets you banned, got it.

DrFate
12-19-2011, 03:58 PM
Once again, if you're "confused" as to why porn pics aren't allowed on the main pages of an all-ages football forum

It's not an all-ages forum. That's the point. And the rep I've gotten on the thread indicates I'm not the only one who feels this way. If Isaac wants to ban pics, ban pics. But don't then mount the high horse and claim this board is family friendly when things that are far more 'hurtful' or 'offensive' are allowed.

Cleo McDowell
12-19-2011, 04:10 PM
So...

No wang mojo threads? That's orientationist.

:Broncos:

http://s3.amazonaws.com/kym-assets/photos/images/newsfeed/000/157/122/f.gif?1318992465

Rohirrim
12-19-2011, 04:14 PM
Life isn't fair.


Alert the media.

That One Guy
12-19-2011, 04:17 PM
The standard used to be no nipples. Unless that rule has been modified and I missed it, everyone can eat a fat one. The closest to a violation you'll find is hard nip picks but you better put a toothpick in your kids' retinas if that's a problem because you can't avoid that in the world.

Popps
12-19-2011, 04:17 PM
It's not an all-ages forum. That's the point. And the rep I've gotten on the thread indicates I'm not the only one who feels this way. If Isaac wants to ban pics, ban pics. But don't then mount the high horse and claim this board is family friendly when things that are far more 'hurtful' or 'offensive' are allowed.

Really? Seems that the owner says that it is. The owner has kids. So do many of the long-term regulars. So, again... want porn, find a porn forum. Why is that hard to grasp?

Your continual need to blur the issue by talking about personal attacks falls short, repeatedly. I've seen more people banned over personal attacks than I have over boobs. So, again... you either are choosing to misunderstand the facts here, or you're in need of help from someone at home.

As for a high horse, Taco simply reminded people of his rules. Not sure what's "high horse" about that.

You have other complaints? Voice them. This issue is easy to understand, though. Thankfully, the grown-ups here seem to get it.

And again, if you're getting any in real life... why would you care this much about porn pics in a football forum? Maybe the focus should be elsewhere...

Tombstone RJ
12-19-2011, 04:19 PM
My God you people are morons.

Popps ended this thread a page ago, but leave it to the idiots to complain about 50 other things, ask for obscure clarifications, etc.

We don't need more mods, we don't need more rules, we need less idiots. Boo hoo, somebody called somebody gay. Boo hoo, somebody said "on the rag." Boo hoo somebody wasn't banned. Life isn't fair. Grow up.

If you can't live without boob images, you need to reassess your life.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/eBtN1i3O4fY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Lycan
12-19-2011, 04:20 PM
Serious question: Girls in bikinis/Cheerleaders = Porn?

cmhargrove
12-19-2011, 04:20 PM
My God you people are morons.

Popps ended this thread a page ago, but leave it to the idiots to complain about 50 other things, ask for obscure clarifications, etc.

We don't need more mods, we don't need more rules, we need less idiots. Boo hoo, somebody called somebody gay. Boo hoo, somebody said "on the rag." Boo hoo somebody wasn't banned. Life isn't fair. Grow up.

If you can't live without boob images, you need to reassess your life.

I guess i'm the "idiot" for trying to ask for a clarification. Many of us come here for some comic relief and some friendly humor. You really don't need to equate an honest question about acceptable humor and "reassessing your life."

Do you really believe that anyone who thinks boob mojo is funny needs to reassess his/her life? We also joke about a lot of things around here, and boobs are just one. A clarification of rules is the best way to encourage proper behavior. When there are no rules, you get a little anarchy. I respect TJ's rules when they exist, I just haven't seen a written rule on this.

I looked all through the FAQ section, and the sticky threads - I didn't see a thing. Is there a written rule on acceptable content? And, does it apply to Avatars as well?

That One Guy
12-19-2011, 04:22 PM
Really? Seems that the owner says that it is. The owner has kids. So do many of the long-term regulars. So, again... want porn, find a porn forum. Why is that hard to grasp?

Your continual need to blur the issue by talking about personal attacks falls short, repeatedly. I've seen more people banned over personal attacks than I have over boobs. So, again... you either are choosing to misunderstand the facts here, or you're in need of help from someone at home.

As for a high horse, Taco simply reminded people of his rules. Not sure what's "high horse" about that.

You have other complaints? Voice them. This issue is easy to understand, though. Thankfully, the grown-ups here seem to get it.

And again, if you're getting any in real life... why would you care this much about porn pics in a football forum? Maybe the focus should be elsewhere...

Your argument loses and merit every time you cite married people should be getting laid. Getting married is what turned me to porn. I got some before that.

Popps
12-19-2011, 04:24 PM
Popps I hear what you are saying and understand your position with being married and not wanting your kids to see half naked chicks on daddys screen. However, the employer in me really doubts that your boss is willingly paying you to debate whether or not you should be seeing boobs on a football forum or not.

Sorry dude. The whole "I should be able to surf at work argument is pretty weak IMO". People shouldn't get paid to surf! There is no way in hell you would pay someone to surf the orangemane Popps. I just don't believe it.

Hell I've been self employed ever since the Mane started and I sometimes feel guilty for even being on here during business hours. I consider myself a casual user with only 20,000 posts in decade but I'll be honest. I've wasted a **** ton of time in here during work hours so I know all you fools have on your bosses dime! Ha!

Was self-employed for a long time, as well. My line of work involves a lot of stop/start, hurry up and waiting. Our company wants the work done quickly and correctly. But during down-time, our bosses are surfing the web or watching Netflix. It's high stress work so the bosses don't seem to mind if people kill time doing something harmless while waiting for workload.

Beyond that, regardless of how a company really felt about work-time web-surfing, you can rest assured what they wouldn't want is porn images flashing across dude's screens during work hours. I mean, pretty much a no-brainer.


By the way... hasn't Taco freely allowed boob mojo threads off the main page? If so, where's the argument? Why are we even having this conversation. There IS a place here to post those pics for people who can't see them in real life. :)

Problem solved.

DBroncos4life
12-19-2011, 04:24 PM
Serious question: Girls in bikinis/Cheerleaders = Porn?

I guess we all got drunk then went hot tubbing last night and ended up in the 50s.

DrFate
12-19-2011, 04:25 PM
Really? Seems that the owner says that it is.

When you allow homophobic slurs, misogynistic remarks, personal insults to people's faith - That's not an 'all ages forum'.

I make this reply not for your benefit but for those who have already agreed with me (both in this thread and privately)

Popps
12-19-2011, 04:25 PM
Your argument loses and merit every time you cite married people should be getting laid. Getting married is what turned me to porn. I got some before that.

:spit:

Might be true for some. Fair enough. Still, there's a time and a place, right?

Grumps
12-19-2011, 04:26 PM
Didn't we learn anything from the last time we did this? I hope you'll be happy with yourself if the Broncos lose out.

TheReverend
12-19-2011, 04:26 PM
I love that this has currently gone 6 pages further than it should have.

That One Guy
12-19-2011, 04:26 PM
Serious question: Girls in bikinis/Cheerleaders = Porn?

Note they've dodged that question about 5 times already. TJ is throwing this out but claiming it's the current rules. If the avatars are acceptable, they would be acceptable in a post. If they're acceptable, boobs mojo just needs to be tamed. It must be because he's sick but this is a surprisingly lazy effort on TJ's part.

Jason in LA
12-19-2011, 04:26 PM
So the boob mojo thread from a few years back gets the boot and then the Broncos went into their worse period in franchise history.

I was in that game thread when Tebow got his first start against the Dolphins. The Broncos were down, some boob mojo went up, and the Broncos went on a magical ride.

If the Broncos miss the playoffs because of this I'm going to be so pissed off.

Popps
12-19-2011, 04:29 PM
When you allow homophobic slurs, misogynistic remarks, personal insults to people's faith - That's not an 'all ages forum'.

I make this reply not for your benefit but for those who have already agreed with me (both in this thread and privately)

People have agreed with me "privately," as well. Oh, and one publicly... the owner of the forum.

Once again, if you find it offensive... complain. Taco's clear and stated attempt is to make this family-friendly. He has banned people for violating those rules. If you think he's to lax, let him know.

But, you stating that breaking one rule is OK because some people seem to break others is child-like.

He's got a vision for his forum and he's set rules accordingly. Misinterpret it all you want, it won't change things.

DBroncos4life
12-19-2011, 04:30 PM
Note they've dodged that question about 5 times already. TJ is throwing this out but claiming it's the current rules. If the avatars are acceptable, they would be acceptable in a post. If they're acceptable, boobs mojo just needs to be tamed. It must be because he's sick but this is a surprisingly lazy effort on TJ's part.

Posters that cry about the pictures can turn them off. It's that simple.

That One Guy
12-19-2011, 04:30 PM
I love that this has currently gone 6 pages further than it should have.

This thread should have value to you because BCJ was able to invoke you in another thread. Seeing him keep your lover's quarrel alive is humorous enough to justify it.

TheReverend
12-19-2011, 04:31 PM
This thread should have value to you because BCJ was able to invoke you in another thread. Seeing him keep your lover's quarrel alive is humorous enough to justify it.

Stalkers gonna stalk.

Popps
12-19-2011, 04:31 PM
Note they've dodged that question about 5 times already. TJ is throwing this out but claiming it's the current rules. If the avatars are acceptable, they would be acceptable in a post. If they're acceptable, boobs mojo just needs to be tamed. It must be because he's sick but this is a surprisingly lazy effort on TJ's part.

The pic that my 5 year old walked up on was two girls making out, holding each other's racks. Great stuff for adults... not so great for a 5 year old.
(And before anyone asks, NO... I didn't complain to TJ. I never said a peep.)

No one has dodged the question. Taco likely assumed the obvious... that people would try to outdo each other until the pics got over the line, which was obviously the case.

Anyway, I'm out. Not sure why I've even posted in this thread. It's simple logic and I'll get to see real boobs as soon as tonight! My best holiday boob-wishes to everyone here.

:thumbsup:

TDmvp
12-19-2011, 04:32 PM
Note they've dodged that question about 5 times already. TJ is throwing this out but claiming it's the current rules. If the avatars are acceptable, they would be acceptable in a post. If they're acceptable, boobs mojo just needs to be tamed. It must be because he's sick but this is a surprisingly lazy effort on TJ's part.



Yea I still want to know if the standard Broncos cheerleader pics are allowed.
This is a test ... If this gets me banned I'll be salty . I want to know if stuff like this is allowed still . If not no biggy but as much as they are used by myself and others clarification would be nice.

http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/3289/denverbroncoscheerleade.jpghttp://img37.imageshack.us/img37/2691/21830582.jpghttp://img593.imageshack.us/img593/5397/n66179663412438594175.jpg

Tombstone RJ
12-19-2011, 04:35 PM
:spit:

Might be true for some. Fair enough. Still, there's a time and a place, right?

I think that's the whole point of boob mojo. I always have the time for it and I'm pretty sure I can always find a place for it too. Let's consider cake and boobs. What a beautiful combination. Truly inspiring. I like cake, I like boobs, combine the two and well, heaven.

That One Guy
12-19-2011, 04:35 PM
The pic that my 5 year old walked up on was two girls making out, holding each other's racks. Great stuff for adults... not so great for a 5 year old.
(And before anyone asks, NO... I didn't complain to TJ. I never said a peep.)

No one has dodged the question. Taco likely assumed the obvious... that people would try to outdo each other until the pics got over the line, which was obviously the case.

Anyway, I'm out. Not sure why I've even posted in this thread. It's simple logic and I'll get to see real boobs as soon as tonight! My best holiday boob-wishes to everyone here.

:thumbsup:

I can't search as I'm on my phone but the old rule was no nipples. That's it. If he's updating rules then it's his place and his rules. I'm just saying the rules need clarified as outlawing boobs mojo is overly vague.

Powderaddict
12-19-2011, 04:40 PM
Post #161 has me thinking of going to Taco Bell and eating 2 tacos.

Rohirrim
12-19-2011, 04:42 PM
Ha! What a joke. What do some of these people want, anyway?

Okay, rule number one. Statute A: Chapter 1:

Don't show boobs (please see FAQs for definition of "boob"). However, this does not apply to cattle or other mammalians. If you are unsure of the acceptability of a boob picture, please submit said boob picture to the acceptance committee for review. You will be notified within thirty days if boob photo is within parameters of this statute. Male breasts will not be covered under this phase of the statute, although this may create an atmosphere of unfairness (in the case of Blart, for example). However, the committee is open to all suggestions at it's annual "Definition of Porn" meeting, aka "I know it when I see it." If some of the children on this site are unclear as to what posting a boob pic means, perhaps they should discuss this with a parent, or perhaps even consider the possibility that they are too young to be posting here? And for you old farts, you probably shouldn't be looking at this stuff anyway.

All members are encouraged to create a fifty page thread discussing the various permutations of this rule and haggle over their own appalling lack of discretion. Any constructive product from such a thread will be treated with the utmost solemnity it deserves.

rmsanger
12-19-2011, 04:43 PM
I see there was an adhoc insertion of no boobs into the word of wisdom; henceforth is shall be:

The scripture discourages "hot drinks", the non-medicinal use of tobacco, the consumption of wine (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wine) (excluding sacramental (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacrament_%28Latter_Day_Saints%29) wine) or "strong drinks", and encourages using meat (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meat) sparingly. The scripture also recommends the consumption of herbs, fruits, and grains, as well as grain-based "mild drinks". As practiced by the LDS Church, there is no firm restriction relating to meat consumption, but there are additional restrictions against narcotics (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcotic), and all alcoholic beverages (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcoholic_beverage) are forbidden, including beer. The LDS Church interprets "hot drinks" to mean coffee (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffee) and tea (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea). and no boobs!

cabronco
12-19-2011, 04:45 PM
So the boob mojo thread from a few years back gets the boot and then the Broncos went into their worse period in franchise history.

I was in that game thread when Tebow got his first start against the Dolphins. The Broncos were down, some boob mojo went up, and the Broncos went on a magical ride.

If the Broncos miss the playoffs because of this I'm going to be so pissed off.

Oh No, this is not good news. Can't we re-visit this issue after the Broncos season. :-[

Taco John
12-19-2011, 04:46 PM
Your argument loses and merit every time you cite married people should be getting laid. Getting married is what turned me to porn. I got some before that.

The force is strong with this one...

Taco John
12-19-2011, 04:49 PM
Sorry dude. The whole "I should be able to surf at work argument is pretty weak IMO".



I totally disagree with this. The bulk of our traffic comes from people posting at work.

At the end of the day, we're not talking about a rule that's being changed. We're talking about re-affirming a rule that's been in place for a decade.

Taco John
12-19-2011, 04:51 PM
Yea I still want to know if the standard Broncos cheerleader pics are allowed.
This is a test ... If this gets me banned I'll be salty . I want to know if stuff like this is allowed still . If not no biggy but as much as they are used by myself and others clarification would be nice.

http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/3289/denverbroncoscheerleade.jpghttp://img37.imageshack.us/img37/2691/21830582.jpghttp://img593.imageshack.us/img593/5397/n66179663412438594175.jpg


This is the loophole that I am powerless against, really. How could we ban anyone for posting a Broncos cheerleader? Even in a game thread, where a cheerleader post could be considered within the proper context?

Tombstone RJ
12-19-2011, 04:51 PM
I totally disagree with this. The bulk of our traffic comes from people posting at work.

At the end of the day, we're not talking about a rule that's being changed. We're talking about re-affirming a rule that's been in place for a decade.

Am I the only one talking about boobs?

TDmvp
12-19-2011, 04:52 PM
This is the loophole that I am powerless against, really. How could we ban anyone for posting a Broncos cheerleader? Even in a game thread, where a cheerleader post could be considered within the proper context?

:notworthy All I wanted ... carry on :) ...

TDmvp
12-19-2011, 04:55 PM
So if we are going to use mojo in a game thread , keep it to Broncos cheerleaders that don't require being censored to be shown on tv and we can have our cake and eat it to so to speak.... Simple compromise. If i'm correctly reading everything right.

Cutler4Life
12-19-2011, 04:57 PM
The birthday threads are fine and in context. We don't need scantily dressed women in game threads - they're out of place, they don't belong, they piss people off, especially me. As far as the avatars go, it's the same as ever. Keep it within the lines of decency, but once it reaches vulgar or ponrographic, mods will react.

That's more than fair. I only asked so it's entirely clear. I am not a huge fan of the plethora of boobs all over the place, but until Bobo and McGruber are permabanned, what can we do, really. ;D

I will refrain from scantily clad girl pics even in the birthday threads, I will let South Stand keep up the Melissa tradition. I will just find more creative ways to celebrate birthdays. As a female, you'd think I would know better, but sometimes I think this board is turning me a little dude like. Just the other day for instance I had to shave my chest. ;D Actually I participated mostly to tweak the guys, but it always always backfires on me.

Inkana7
12-19-2011, 04:57 PM
Oh, I got it.... so, I shouldn't be able to ever see football-related or work-safe images because 4 jagovs can't get laid and have to post boob pics all day on a site that's clearly denoted as a family-friendly, football-related site?

Thanks for clearing it up.
This forum is not family-friendly, and it's not because of boob pics.

broncogary
12-19-2011, 05:01 PM
Oh hell I'd rather see boobs than that profile pic you've got. Damn!

Happy early birthday and I hope you get a pelethora of boobs.

My eyes! You made me look.

Taco John
12-19-2011, 05:13 PM
I wish I wasn't sick, or didn't have to start this thread when I was sick. I just want people to use their heads. We don't have hard and fast rules that are written down like a ten commandments. We have long standing cultural rules and you either sink or you swim. This forum is more than lihneiant (I can't even spell lineiant right now OMG). The point of this forum is to bring people together to talk about the Broncos while trying to appeal to the highest common denominator. You want a rule? "Use your head." Because we're going to be using ours as forum administrators. No family smack, no nudity, respect the forum, use your head... If you need hard and fast rules beyond that, you might be in the wrong forum. This approach has done us well for 10 years, and gotten us through a lot of adversity.

By the way, I should comment that if SOPA passes, it's probably going to be the end of this forum as we know it because of things like "boob mojo". We'll, of course, try to remain open for as long as we can, but I figure it only a matter of time once that thing passes. I hope I'm wrong, but I mean - come on.

Here's more info on just how dangerous SOPA is going to be for sites like this:
http://torrentfreak.com/sopa-will-mean-the-end-of-reddit-says-general-manager-111219/

TheReverend
12-19-2011, 05:14 PM
^ lenient.

ICON
12-19-2011, 05:22 PM
http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2009/3/21/128821470106003130.jpg

Chris
12-19-2011, 05:41 PM
Seeing as I use my girlfriend's boobs as a headrest while posting, I'll be fine.

Jason in LA
12-19-2011, 05:46 PM
This is the loophole that I am powerless against, really. How could we ban anyone for posting a Broncos cheerleader? Even in a game thread, where a cheerleader post could be considered within the proper context?


How about naked Broncos cheerleaders? Still waiting. ;D

Chris
12-19-2011, 05:47 PM
No offense TJ but the lack of moderation on the site (which I agree with in principle) actually means you're shooting closer to the lower common denominator than anything. Hence all the fighting, name calling, homophobia, religion (or non-religion) bashing, etc.

Bronx33
12-19-2011, 05:48 PM
A few babies screw it up for everybody else all i know is the season is lost i tell ya!! LOST!!

gyldenlove
12-19-2011, 05:50 PM
That's more than fair. I only asked so it's entirely clear. I am not a huge fan of the plethora of boobs all over the place, but until Bobo and McGruber are permabanned, what can we do, really. ;D

I will refrain from scantily clad girl pics even in the birthday threads, I will let South Stand keep up the Melissa tradition. I will just find more creative ways to celebrate birthdays. As a female, you'd think I would know better, but sometimes I think this board is turning me a little dude like. Just the other day for instance I had to shave my chest. ;D Actually I participated mostly to tweak the guys, but it always always backfires on me.

But you do such good birthday threads!

McDman
12-19-2011, 05:53 PM
The new women of the Mane...

http://ldstalk.com/wp-content/images/mormon-history/mormon-Women.jpg

broncogary
12-19-2011, 05:54 PM
Someone will just have to take one for the team.

Bronx33
12-19-2011, 05:54 PM
So...

No wang mojo threads? That's orientationist.

:Broncos:


Tube steak isn't lucky boobs clearly are lucky i dont make the rules i just follow them ;D

Garcia Bronco
12-19-2011, 05:56 PM
All this discussion.

Quit posting pictures of boobs in the main forum ya pervs. Post the good ones in the proper place, then send me the link. :p

Meck77
12-19-2011, 06:09 PM
By the way, I should comment that if SOPA passes, it's probably going to be the end of this forum as we know it because of things like "boob mojo". We'll, of course, try to remain open for as long as we can, but I figure it only a matter of time once that thing passes. I hope I'm wrong, but I mean - come on.

Here's more info on just how dangerous SOPA is going to be for sites like this:
http://torrentfreak.com/sopa-will-mean-the-end-of-reddit-says-general-manager-111219/

I signed the petition awhile back when you brought this to the forums attention. For those of you who missed it you can email congress a letter opposing this bill via this link.

http://americancensorship.org/

I see this much like eminent domain. People just take for granted the freedom to own property or this case the freedom they have on the internet. With a blink of an eye it can disappear and they'll wonder "Why didn't anyone tell me?". Taco you reached out to thousands of people with your sticky. I just wonder how many took action. Sadly boob mojo probably got more attention.

Jetmeck
12-19-2011, 07:02 PM
Given this warning before, and people insist on breaking the rules. We've been lenient in the past, but I'm tired of getting the complaints. Keep it out of the main forum - this is not a porno post.

So your banning BOOB or BoB ? bout time..............

BroncoBen
12-19-2011, 07:06 PM
Well this has been a fun ThreadÖ and it not really Bronco relatedÖ more a issue of censorship.

I keep reading about act like an adult, viewing images at work, or home in front of the children. Well it seems to me as an adult I realize maybe surfing sites at work or on a big screen at home (with children) is done at your own risk. Iíve been posting on this site for 6 years, and it seems this issue comes up every now and then.

Itís just like politics .. a vocal minority usually gets the most attention.

Just like at home, if you donít want to see something on TV or a Movie.. donít watch it.. you have that choice.

Itís not that big of a deal.. if you donít like a posterís views, thoughts, images, etc.. block them.. you have that choice.

Bottom line is someone is always going to have an issue with something, being an adult means donít take everything so seriously.

Garcia Bronco
12-19-2011, 07:08 PM
The new women of the Mane...

http://ldstalk.com/wp-content/images/mormon-history/mormon-Women.jpg

I bet the one on the right shows a lot of ankle. Grrrrrr!

broncogary
12-19-2011, 07:17 PM
I bet the one on the right shows a lot of ankle. Grrrrrr!

It's going to take a lot of beer. ;D

houghtam
12-19-2011, 07:22 PM
It's going to take a lot of beer. ;D

Yeah she shows a lot of eyebrow, too.

cutthemdown
12-19-2011, 07:32 PM
The pic that my 5 year old walked up on was two girls making out, holding each other's racks. Great stuff for adults... not so great for a 5 year old.
(And before anyone asks, NO... I didn't complain to TJ. I never said a peep.)

No one has dodged the question. Taco likely assumed the obvious... that people would try to outdo each other until the pics got over the line, which was obviously the case.

Anyway, I'm out. Not sure why I've even posted in this thread. It's simple logic and I'll get to see real boobs as soon as tonight! My best holiday boob-wishes to everyone here.

:thumbsup:

Your own boobs don't count!

Rother8
12-19-2011, 07:35 PM
What about
Pomhub.com ?

Garcia Bronco
12-19-2011, 07:42 PM
Your own boobs don't count!

It probably is his boobs. They just also belong to his wife. :p

oubronco
12-19-2011, 08:10 PM
All this discussion.

Quit posting pictures of boobs in the main forum ya pervs. Post the good ones in the proper place, then send me the link. :p

Here you go

http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showthread.php?t=74435

Lev Vyvanse
12-19-2011, 08:35 PM
So... we are all in agreement. The rule is no penetration and anything else is fair game?

TheReverend
12-19-2011, 08:37 PM
So... we are all in agreement. The rule is no penetration and anything else is fair game?

That's what I took from this thread.

rugbythug
12-19-2011, 08:39 PM
So... we are all in agreement. The rule is no penetration and anything else is fair game?

That's only for avatars.

Blueflame
12-19-2011, 08:40 PM
Simplest solution: start the gameday threads in the Butt and post boob pics there to your heart's content.

Rohirrim
12-19-2011, 08:44 PM
I suggest we switch to Amish mojo.

http://chimovement.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/amish_cholas.jpg

That One Guy
12-19-2011, 08:46 PM
Simplest solution: start the gameday threads in the Butt and post boob pics there to your heart's content.

If the mods were more useful than the 4th shake, most of the current threads would end up there anyways. You outta make the main forums the butt and make the community section the family friendly side. Nobody wants to go there anyways.

Meck77
12-19-2011, 08:49 PM
Simplest solution: start the gameday threads in the Butt and post boob pics there to your heart's content.

Not a bad idea. Either that or simply have one in each forum. Guys that can't get laid according to popps Ha! can post in the butt boob mojo thread. Married dads with kids can stay in the main forum so their wives and kids aren't looking over their shoulders.

It's a win win.

Blueflame
12-19-2011, 08:51 PM
Not a bad idea. Either that or simply have one in each forum. Boob lovers can hit the butt. Ha! Married dads with kids can stay in the main forum so their wives and kids aren't looking over their shoulders.

It's win/win... the main forum stays "clean" but "boob mojo" still keeps rocking; only in the forum where TJ wants that type of content.

broncogary
12-19-2011, 09:08 PM
http://www.library.arizona.edu/exhibits/burnedbooks/documents.htm

ICON
12-19-2011, 09:13 PM
Someone will just have to take one for the team.:wiggle:

ghwk
12-19-2011, 09:15 PM
So...

No wang mojo threads? That's orientationist.

:Broncos:

NOW your avi offends me! ROFL!

Actually it's so perfectly passive aggressive to the thread that I LOL'd.

Goobzilla
12-19-2011, 09:19 PM
Enjoy the 1 page game thread in the main forum. See the cool kids in the Butt Sunday!

ghwk
12-19-2011, 09:22 PM
Was self-employed for a long time, as well. My line of work involves a lot of stop/start, hurry up and waiting. Our company wants the work done quickly and correctly. But during down-time, our bosses are surfing the web or watching Netflix. It's high stress work so the bosses don't seem to mind if people kill time doing something harmless while waiting for workload.

Beyond that, regardless of how a company really felt about work-time web-surfing, you can rest assured what they wouldn't want is porn images flashing across dude's screens during work hours. I mean, pretty much a no-brainer.


By the way... hasn't Taco freely allowed boob mojo threads off the main page? If so, where's the argument? Why are we even having this conversation. There IS a place here to post those pics for people who can't see them in real life. :)

Problem solved.

Plus just use the new posts button and you know when there is something to look at. I really don't see the issue here.

Ironlung
12-19-2011, 10:02 PM
As long as no one takes BroncoBen's avatars away, I'm good.

Dagmar
12-19-2011, 10:11 PM
Last time this happened we tanked our year...

Bronx33
12-19-2011, 10:12 PM
No good ever came from taking away boobs....

teknic
12-19-2011, 10:16 PM
Well this has been a fun ThreadÖ and it not really Bronco relatedÖ more a issue of censorship.

I keep reading about act like an adult, viewing images at work, or home in front of the children. Well it seems to me as an adult I realize maybe surfing sites at work or on a big screen at home (with children) is done at your own risk. Iíve been posting on this site for 6 years, and it seems this issue comes up every now and then.

Itís just like politics .. a vocal minority usually gets the most attention.

Just like at home, if you donít want to see something on TV or a Movie.. donít watch it.. you have that choice.

Itís not that big of a deal.. if you donít like a posterís views, thoughts, images, etc.. block them.. you have that choice.

Bottom line is someone is always going to have an issue with something, being an adult means donít take everything so seriously.

This... Make it an understandable, easy to enforce rule, and people will listen. No nudity is a fair rule, in my opinion. I just don't see a point in trying to enforce it any other way, because avatars and cheerleader pics cause the same issues. I don't personally understand the persecution of the human body that is observed in today's culture, but I'm willing to follow the rules. I can't accept a rule that is completely hypocritical however. If it's allowed in avatars, and we can still post cheerleaders, what exactly is accomplished by enforcing this rule?

It was pointed out that image posts can be disabled. If you are in a scenario where seeing pictures of boobs on your screen would be inappropriate, disable images or surf at your own discretion. The main demographic that watches football is adult men. You see as many boobs in beer commercials during the games as on the forum.

I came to this site from denverbroncos.com because I couldn't stand it over there any longer. But with all the unnecessary drama around these forums, the online tailgate party that never ends is starting to feel like the high school tailgate with warm beer and 60 year old women.



The real question....

Is this alright by the new rules? It's just text.

( . Y . )

broncocalijohn
12-19-2011, 10:40 PM
Enjoy the 1 page game thread in the main forum. See the cool kids in the Butt Sunday!

Nothing like celebrating Christmas Eve with some tasty tail and bigtime headlights.

HAT
12-19-2011, 10:53 PM
The real question....

Is this alright by the new rules? It's just text.

( . Y . )

Hey A-hole...my boss just saw that over my shoulder. How about a NSFW warning?

houghtam
12-19-2011, 11:03 PM
Hey A-hole...my boss just saw that over my shoulder. How about a NSFW warning?

LOL they look gross in italics.

teknic
12-19-2011, 11:06 PM
Hey A-hole...my boss just saw that over my shoulder. How about a NSFW warning?

Tell him they are eyes. :wiggle:

broncocalijohn
12-19-2011, 11:11 PM
Hey A-hole...my boss just saw that over my shoulder. How about a NSFW warning?

I thought it was your 5 year old looking over your shoulder.

HAT
12-19-2011, 11:16 PM
I thought it was your 5 year old looking over your shoulder.

Nah...I never surf the O'mane when my kiddo can see. There's jacked up avatars. :thumbsup:

Boogerboots
12-19-2011, 11:21 PM
The real question....

Is this alright by the new rules? It's just text.

( . Y . )o

That's gotta be at least a DD font.... but I agree with Boss Taco and Rosco Picco Popps on this one. Game day threads should be off limits for extremely provocative pics. I've gotten the "what's that" reaction several times from my 3 year old son as he rounded the corner of my home office. Proper time... proper forum.

Plenty of sites with silicone injected mojo out there if you really need it.

t-diddy
12-19-2011, 11:36 PM
This... Make it an understandable, easy to enforce rule, and people will listen. No nudity is a fair rule, in my opinion. I just don't see a point in trying to enforce it any other way, because avatars and cheerleader pics cause the same issues. I don't personally understand the persecution of the human body that is observed in today's culture, but I'm willing to follow the rules. I can't accept a rule that is completely hypocritical however. If it's allowed in avatars, and we can still post cheerleaders, what exactly is accomplished by enforcing this rule?

It was pointed out that image posts can be disabled. If you are in a scenario where seeing pictures of boobs on your screen would be inappropriate, disable images or surf at your own discretion. The main demographic that watches football is adult men. You see as many boobs in beer commercials during the games as on the forum.

I came to this site from denverbroncos.com because I couldn't stand it over there any longer. But with all the unnecessary drama around these forums, the online tailgate party that never ends is starting to feel like the high school tailgate with warm beer and 60 year old women.



The real question....

Is this alright by the new rules? It's just text.

( . Y . )

Post reported. Neg rep. Five year olds therapy bill on the way to you.

SureShot
12-19-2011, 11:45 PM
Jesus titty ****ing Christ. Why do you hate the Broncos TJ?

Boogerboots
12-19-2011, 11:57 PM
Hey A-hole...my boss just saw that over my shoulder. How about a NSFW warning?

I think Teknic used points... Your avatar is
using bullets
Great grandmother's spatula!!!

canadianbroncosfan
12-20-2011, 12:01 AM
So just so I don't have to surf nine pages. If we want the Offical Boob Mojo Game Thread, it's in the Horse's Butt :D?

stopgap
12-20-2011, 01:00 AM
Given this warning before, and people insist on breaking the rules. We've been lenient in the past, but I'm tired of getting the complaints. Keep it out of the main forum - this is not a porno post.

Addendum: B and C-cups are allowed

Agamemnon
12-20-2011, 02:11 AM
Let me make this simple for those who can't understand Taco's easy to understand logic...

If you've got kids, you probably don't want to be unknowingly clicking on threads with strippers 69'ing each other as your kids walk up behind you.

Conversely, if you've got kids... you're already getting laid so posting boob pics is probably not a necessary part of your day.

On top of that, if you've got kids... and you're getting laid... you've probably got a job.

Guess what else you don't want popping up on your computer screen if you have a job that allows you to check football scores and related material?

All make sense?

Get a job, get laid... and you won't need boob pics on a football forum to get through your day.

Having sex in no way diminishes the appeal of looking at a nice pair of breasts, and most men with kids are usually getting only slightly more action than 14 year old virgin boys with acne.

ol#7
12-20-2011, 04:34 AM
Having sex in no way diminishes the appeal of looking at a nice pair of breasts, and most men with kids are usually getting only slightly more action than 14 year old virgin boys with acne.

What I have taken away from this thread.

1. Popps really likes to brown nose/kiss ass.

2. TJ secretly hates the Broncos. Sorry, you got Shanny fired and now your doubling down out of guilt.

3. Americans are weird, I go to Rewe (German super market) and see full on naked boobs everywhere, including a few billboards on the way.

4. Trolls like ClamChowdah can puke all over the boards anytime they want.

5. Mods are part time, sorta like the gift wrappers at the mall.

GreatBronco16
12-20-2011, 05:10 AM
What I have taken away from this thread.

1. Popps really likes to brown nose/kiss ass.

2. TJ secretly hates the Broncos. Sorry, you got Shanny fired and now your doubling down out of guilt.

3. Americans are weird, I go to Rewe (German super market) and see full on naked boobs everywhere, including a few billboards on the way.

4. Trolls like ClamChowdah can puke all over the boards anytime they want.

5. Mods are part time, sorta like the gift wrappers at the mall.

Pretty much.

Dr. Broncenstein
12-20-2011, 05:57 AM
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Gfzyym7IlRQ/TvCEsinMAhI/AAAAAAAAADc/UnQ2BqpPAP0/s511/116388_5_.jpg

Email the boobs in congress and tell them the interwebs should be loose and free.

Dr. Broncenstein
12-20-2011, 06:01 AM
http://broncotalk.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/montraeholland.jpg

This is a football board, not 4chan.

vancejohnson82
12-20-2011, 06:51 AM
this isn't where I parked my car

BowlenBall
12-20-2011, 08:29 AM
Well, looks like I'll have to start using the local Abu Dhabi boob mojo from here on out... hope this is enough to beat Buffalo!
http://i1.tribune.com.pk/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/286425-burqareuters-1320244689-676-640x480.jpg

DBroncos4life
12-20-2011, 09:07 AM
What I have taken away from this thread.

1. Popps really likes to brown nose/kiss ass.

2. TJ secretly hates the Broncos. Sorry, you got Shanny fired and now your doubling down out of guilt.

3. Americans are weird, I go to Rewe (German super market) and see full on naked boobs everywhere, including a few billboards on the way.

4. Trolls like ClamChowdah can puke all over the boards anytime they want.

5. Mods are part time, sorta like the gift wrappers at the mall.

It must be SO hard to parent there.

vancejohnson82
12-20-2011, 09:51 AM
It must be SO hard to parent there.

I hear they show Ghostbusters on public access television there

DBroncos4life
12-20-2011, 10:04 AM
I hear they show Ghostbusters on public access television there

Man we really ****ed them over after WWll.

ol#7
12-20-2011, 10:05 AM
It must be SO hard to parent there.

Amazingly, they dont get so hung up on such things. Also have alot less crime. Boobs are the glue that hold society together.

What can I say, America was founded by uptight Puritans.

Rohirrim
12-20-2011, 10:23 AM
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Gfzyym7IlRQ/TvCEsinMAhI/AAAAAAAAADc/UnQ2BqpPAP0/s511/116388_5_.jpg

Email the boobs in congress and tell them the interwebs should be loose and free.

I could have gone my whole life without seeing that.

Pick Six
12-20-2011, 11:03 AM
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Gfzyym7IlRQ/TvCEsinMAhI/AAAAAAAAADc/UnQ2BqpPAP0/s511/116388_5_.jpg

Email the boobs in congress and tell them the interwebs should be loose and free.

No wonder he's leaving Congress. He has to have time to get that breast reduction...

Pony Boy
12-20-2011, 11:11 AM
Hey A-hole...my boss just saw that over my shoulder. How about a NSFW warning?

This works ......

Play2win
12-20-2011, 11:16 AM
What I have taken away from this thread.

1. Popps really likes to brown nose/kiss ass.

2. TJ secretly hates the Broncos. Sorry, you got Shanny fired and now your doubling down out of guilt.

3. Americans are weird, I go to Rewe (German super market) and see full on naked boobs everywhere, including a few billboards on the way.

4. Trolls like ClamChowdah can puke all over the boards anytime they want.

5. Mods are part time, sorta like the gift wrappers at the mall.

Or like NFL referees, but thats another story... LOL

Meck77
12-20-2011, 11:34 AM
Well, looks like I'll have to start using the local Abu Dhabi boob mojo from here on out... hope this is enough to beat Buffalo!
http://i1.tribune.com.pk/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/286425-burqareuters-1320244689-676-640x480.jpg

Hilarious!

I heard Pat Bowlen is getting in on the action. Orange sheets on all his cheerleaders from now on! Also no tank tops or bikini tops allowed for women in the stadium. Skirts? BANNED!

t-diddy
12-20-2011, 02:18 PM
For the record, nobody who ACTUALLY gets laid on a regular basis has to talk about how much they get laid every other sentence...

Its kinda like that guy on the internet that brags about how huge his wanker is all the time. Pretty sure that guy isn't telling the whole truth.

Pick Six
12-20-2011, 02:20 PM
Hilarious!

I heard Pat Bowlen is getting in on the action. Orange sheets on all his cheerleaders from now on! Also no tank tops or bikini tops allowed for women in the stadium. Skirts? BANNED!

If the women arrive at the stadium with no clothes at all, there would be no question about a particular article of clothing being acceptable. There's your answer...:strong:

houghtam
12-20-2011, 02:38 PM
If the women arrive at the stadium with no clothes at all, there would be no question about a particular article of clothing being acceptable. There's your answer...:strong:

Thousands of naked women (or women in tank tops or short skirts, for that matter)...all it takes to ruin the mood is one nasty one. :mullet1:

Do you really want to go down that road?

Gort
12-20-2011, 02:41 PM
i'd like to be the first to congratulate the Raiders and Tyrell Jones on winning the AFC West this season.

:cuss:

Popps
12-20-2011, 02:51 PM
Well, looks like I'll have to start using the local Abu Dhabi boob mojo from here on out... hope this is enough to beat Buffalo!
http://i1.tribune.com.pk/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/286425-burqareuters-1320244689-676-640x480.jpg

Middle one is hot.

Gort
12-20-2011, 02:55 PM
Middle one is hot.

meh.

she has sharp knees.

Dr. Broncenstein
12-20-2011, 03:02 PM
You know the one hiding in the back is DTF.