PDA

View Full Version : Romney ‘If You Want Peace, Prepare For War’


Bronco_Beerslug
11-09-2011, 06:08 PM
Great, another Republican who wants to take us to war in the Middle East...

-------------------------------------------------------

‘If You Want Peace, Prepare For War’ (http://thinkprogress.org/security/2011/11/09/365711/romney-iran-war/)

Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney threatened war with Iran in an oped set to appear in tomorrow’s Wall Street Journal. “I will back up American diplomacy with a very real and very credible military option,” wrote the former Massachusetts governor. He quoted a Latin phrase and said the Iranian regime would understand: “If you want peace, prepare for war.” The Romney campaign’s foreign policy team is stacked with hawks that led the charge for the war with Iraq and have been pushing to launch one against Iran. One adviser has even advocated for a controversial Iranian anti-regime exile group that’s on the State Department’s list of terror groups.

ELIOT COHEN
Cohen, who was a member of the short-lived Committee for the Liberation of Iraq that agitated for an invasion in 2002 and early 2003 and now directs the Johns Hopkins international affairs school, stuck to the theme that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction right up until the eve of the U.S. invasion.

ROBERT KAGAN
Kagan, a founder of the Project For A New American Century (PNAC) and the Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI), argued for the military overthrow of Saddam Hussein beginning in the mid 1990s. In late 1998, after President Bill Clinton launched airstrikes against Iraq, Kagan complained on NPR that the attack didn’t go far enough and that Hussein needed to be overthrown:

PNAC, one of the groups Kagan founded (along with neoconservative don Bill Kristol), made statements and wrote a series of open letters to Presidents Clinton and George W. Bush from 1998 to 2003 that referred to Iraq, often calling for the military overthrow of Saddam Hussein and accusing him both of possessing weapons of mass destruction and having ties to Al Qaeda. Among the signatories to the letters were a bevy of those listed today as Romney advisers, including Kagan himself, Cohen, Paula Dobriansky, Vin Weber, John Lehman (a National Security Advisory Council member of the Islamophobic Center for Security Policy), now-super-lobbyist Vin Weber.

CONT...

orinjkrush
11-10-2011, 06:08 AM
we're already at war. two of them. we haven't had peace since...since....

Obama....Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya
GWB2....Iraq, Afghanistan, Global War on Terrorism
Clinton....Somalia...Bosnia...Afghanistan
GWB1....Iraq....Panama
Reagan.... Nicaragua..Cold War...Grenada
Carter...Iran
Ford...
Nixon...Vietnam
Johnson...Vietnam
Kennedy...Vietnam...Cuba
Eisenhower...Korea
Truman....WWII...Korea
FDR...WWII

and on and on and on and on....

Bronco_Beerslug
11-10-2011, 08:19 AM
we're already at war. two of them. we haven't had peace since...since....
Obama....Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya
Incorrect. We are out of Iraq, on our way out of Afghanistan thanks to Obama (both invasions and occupations by Bush) and never did go to war with Libya.

You need to understand what "we are at war" means. Clandestine operations by intelligence agencies where American troops are not involved are not "wars".

Rohirrim
11-10-2011, 08:22 AM
Don't worry. He'll say the exact opposite next week.

Rohirrim
11-10-2011, 08:22 AM
we're already at war. two of them. we haven't had peace since...since....

Obama....Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya
GWB2....Iraq, Afghanistan, Global War on Terrorism
Clinton....Somalia...Bosnia...Afghanistan
GWB1....Iraq....Panama
Reagan.... Nicaragua..Cold War...Grenada
Carter...Iran
Ford...
Nixon...Vietnam
Johnson...Vietnam
Kennedy...Vietnam...Cuba
Eisenhower...Korea
Truman....WWII...Korea
FDR...WWII

and on and on and on and on....

Perpetual war. Didn't Orwell say something about that?

El Guapo
11-10-2011, 09:30 AM
Incorrect. We are out of Iraq, on our way out of Afghanistan thanks to Obama (both invasions and occupations by Bush) and never did go to war with Libya.

You need to understand what "we are at war" means. Clandestine operations by intelligence agencies where American troops are not involved are not "wars".

Oh yeah, that non-war war we had in Libya. Yup, none of our munitions were used in that.

Pony Boy
11-10-2011, 10:47 AM
Incorrect. We are out of Iraq, on our way out of Afghanistan thanks to Obama (both invasions and occupations by Bush) and never did go to war with Libya.

You need to understand what "we are at war" means. Clandestine operations by intelligence agencies where American troops are not involved are not "wars".

So tell us what would your answer to a Nuclear Iran be?

El Minion
11-10-2011, 11:41 AM
So tell us what would your answer to a Nuclear Iran be?

Why does the US have to be the worlds police? What is the answer to China, Russia, Pakistan and N. Korea having WMD? I don't want Iran to have WMD or any more countries for that matter, but really if US and UK didn't overthrow the democratic government of Iran, and prop up the Shah of Iran we wouldn't be in this mess. Ironic that Eisenhower ordered this and other foreign government interventions/overthrows only to warn against "military–industrial complex" when leaving office.

Rohirrim
11-10-2011, 12:39 PM
So tell us what would your answer to a Nuclear Iran be?

Same answer we have for a nuclear Pakistan, I guess.

orinjkrush
11-10-2011, 06:36 PM
Incorrect. We are out of Iraq, on our way out of Afghanistan thanks to Obama (both invasions and occupations by Bush) and never did go to war with Libya.

You need to understand what "we are at war" means. Clandestine operations by intelligence agencies where American troops are not involved are not "wars".

seriously?

Bronco_Beerslug
11-11-2011, 12:43 AM
So tell us what would your answer to a Nuclear Iran be?
Haven't you figured that out yet? There is no "answer".

The U.S. has no right to attack and/or invade and occupy any country that hasn't attacked us. If one of our allies was attacked, maybe, depending on the circumstances.

You better get used to a lot more countries joining the nuclear age in the future. Some will do it by just purchasing those weapons instead of developing them.

Any country that launches a nuclear attack on us knows they are committing suicide. There is no way stop that from happening if that's what they desire.

In the nuclear age, the world becomes a more deadly place with every day that passes.

Bronco_Beerslug
04-18-2012, 04:32 AM
So now that the latest Right Wing war monger has been "chosen", why would any American want another one in office?