PDA

View Full Version : McBean arrested


zdoor
10-17-2011, 12:32 PM
http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_19131874

gyldenlove
10-17-2011, 12:33 PM
Great news!

crush17
10-17-2011, 12:34 PM
Stalking? Whuuuuuut?

oubronco
10-17-2011, 12:35 PM
For stalking damn idiot

UberBroncoMan
10-17-2011, 12:35 PM
BAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

How many DT's do we have now if he gets the suspension? 3?

Requiem
10-17-2011, 12:35 PM
Things just keep gettin' better.

HooptyHoops
10-17-2011, 12:37 PM
Is this suspension worthy?

Kaylore
10-17-2011, 12:38 PM
I wonder if he tried to hide behind something. That would have been funny.

Kid A
10-17-2011, 12:38 PM
http://www.ffuucomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Ride-Home-FFFFUUUU.jpg

oubronco
10-17-2011, 12:39 PM
Suck for Luck in motion

HILife
10-17-2011, 12:39 PM
**** rolling down hill now.

Popps
10-17-2011, 12:41 PM
http://systemofsystems.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/good-grief-charlie-brown1.jpg

UberBroncoMan
10-17-2011, 12:41 PM
<iframe width="480" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/i01Vt7REXGQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Houshyamama
10-17-2011, 12:41 PM
GOOD NEWS EVERYONE!

BroncsCheer
10-17-2011, 12:46 PM
You have got to be ****ing kidding me!

Memento
10-17-2011, 12:47 PM
He'll beat the rap... he's already been acquitted of stalking QBs and RBs (sorry).

WABronco
10-17-2011, 12:48 PM
Awesome. I've always wanted to be like a NFL'er.

Rohirrim
10-17-2011, 12:48 PM
I wonder if he tried to hide behind something. That would have been funny.

Hilarious!

That was what came to my mind too. How's he going to sneak up on anybody?

TheDave
10-17-2011, 12:52 PM
When you are winning these kind of stories are easy to laugh off... The losing just makes this crap almost unbearable.

kappys
10-17-2011, 12:53 PM
<iframe width="480" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/i01Vt7REXGQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Post of the day

Agamemnon
10-17-2011, 12:53 PM
Being a fan of this team is pure masochism anymore...

bronco militia
10-17-2011, 12:54 PM
must be the bye week

Dr. Broncenstein
10-17-2011, 12:55 PM
Being a fan of this team is pure masochism anymore...

:spit: LOL

ColoradoDarin
10-17-2011, 12:56 PM
<object width="420" height="315"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WQZqJ_-WAO8?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WQZqJ_-WAO8?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="420" height="315" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>

Play2win
10-17-2011, 01:00 PM
Defensive Tackles... We don't need no stinkin' Defensive Tackles!!

Captain 'Dre
10-17-2011, 01:02 PM
http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_19131874

From the looks of the photo, he was stalking Philip Rivers. :)

Rohirrim
10-17-2011, 01:05 PM
When you are winning these kind of stories are easy to laugh off... The losing just makes this crap almost unbearable.

http://youtu.be/3IX-sP6QP4k

Gort
10-17-2011, 01:36 PM
maybe this isn't reality. maybe we are all just part of one of Gary Busey's waking daydreams. that would explain alot, wouldn't it?

oh, and you'd be awesome McBean, except you're not. :thumbsdow

http://img360.imageshack.us/img360/1693/12263305604681aq9.jpg

LRtagger
10-17-2011, 01:38 PM
He was just hammin it up

Chris
10-17-2011, 02:32 PM
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/vtmtELlo6pk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

bendog
10-17-2011, 02:51 PM
I'm hoping he was just stalking a Wendy's employee because she had one of the new hamburgers ....

TheReverend
10-17-2011, 02:54 PM
http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_19131874

Whatever and who cares? With the new avy I'm busy fantasizing about your wife. Ha!

Great work again man.

elsid13
10-17-2011, 02:57 PM
I wonder if he tried to hide behind something. That would have been funny.

I had the same thought.

TheReverend
10-17-2011, 02:57 PM
So, we had/have:

1 Rapist (Cox)
1 Extremely classy guy (Prater)
2 Top-tier Creeps (Demarius and McBean)

TheDave
10-17-2011, 02:59 PM
So, we had/have:

1 Rapist (Cox)
1 Extremely classy guy (Prater)
2 Top-tier Creeps (Demarius and McBean)

This and I'm surprised the bold isn't mentioned more often.

TheReverend
10-17-2011, 02:59 PM
This and I'm surprised the bold isn't mentioned more often.

He's more physical with drunk girls than he is defensive backs, 'nomsayin?

UberBroncoMan
10-17-2011, 03:07 PM
<object width="585" height="400"> <param name="movie" value="http://www.kovideo.net/assets/swf/K0Video.swf"></param> <param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param> <param name="FlashVars" value="songId=1216851"></param> <embed src="http://www.kovideo.net/assets/swf/K0Video.swf" FlashVars="songId=1216851" width="585" height="400" allowScriptAccess="always" allowFullScreen="true" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object>

Bronco Yoda
10-17-2011, 03:11 PM
wtf...?

Kaylore
10-17-2011, 03:11 PM
This and I'm surprised the bold isn't mentioned more often.

I'm unclear why Demarius is suddenly a rapist too...

TheDave
10-17-2011, 03:12 PM
I'm unclear why Demarius is suddenly a rapist too...

creep... just a creep for now.

Gort
10-17-2011, 03:49 PM
creep... just a creep for now.

Nate Webster trumps every other Bronco.

seriously though, wouldn't it be easier to list the Broncos who haven't been arrested at this point? i'm sick of it. 5 or 6 guys every year get into trouble with Johnny Lawman. 'roided out punters. sammich makers. baby makers. guys getting their drink and drive on. etc. etc. etc. didn't the NFL create a program precisely to nip these problems in the bud with young players? it's kind of hard to root for guys on Sunday wearing Broncos uniforms when we find out that during the rest of the week, alot of them are no better than Raiders players.

HILife
10-17-2011, 04:53 PM
So, we had/have:

1 Rapist (Cox)
1 Extremely classy guy (Prater)
2 Top-tier Creeps (Demarius and McBean)

"Ha. What a bunch of losers" ~

http://a323.yahoofs.com/ymg/ept_sports_nfl_experts__14/ept_sports_nfl_experts-75546489-1245228474.jpg?ym6GkbBDVVZ9ZTOk

TheReverend
10-17-2011, 04:54 PM
"Ha. What a bunch of losers" ~

http://a323.yahoofs.com/ymg/ept_sports_nfl_experts__14/ept_sports_nfl_experts-75546489-1245228474.jpg?ym6GkbBDVVZ9ZTOk

:spit:

...but at least he could play some ****ing football on Sunday.

Agamemnon
10-17-2011, 04:54 PM
Nate Webster trumps every other Bronco.

seriously though, wouldn't it be easier to list the Broncos who haven't been arrested at this point? i'm sick of it. 5 or 6 guys every year get into trouble with Johnny Lawman. 'roided out punters. sammich makers. baby makers. guys getting their drink and drive on. etc. etc. etc. didn't the NFL create a program precisely to nip these problems in the bud with young players? it's kind of hard to root for guys on Sunday wearing Broncos uniforms when we find out that during the rest of the week, alot of them are no better than Raiders players.

One of the reasons so many of us are so excited and hopeful about Tebow...

Agamemnon
10-17-2011, 04:56 PM
I'm unclear why Demarius is suddenly a rapist too...

It's fascinating how some peoples' minds work isn't it?

WolfpackGuy
10-17-2011, 04:58 PM
Who?

LOL

Popps
10-17-2011, 05:34 PM
Yea, I miss the good old days when we had upstanding guys on our team...


http://extras.mnginteractive.com/live/media/site36/2007/0521/20070521_040310_kircus_200.jpg
http://thewallofbadass.com/pics/clarett.jpg
http://straightfromthea.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/127426d1235972829-denvers-brandon-marshall-arrested-again-time-disorderly-conduct-marshall-mugshot.jpg
http://www.foxnews.com/images/445683/2_61_100108_henry.jpg

ward63
10-17-2011, 05:45 PM
Defensive Tackles... We don't need no stinkin' Defensive Tackles!!

True...all we need is some defensive ends.



(sarcasm) :wave:

Bronx33
10-17-2011, 05:45 PM
Pathetic

vancejohnson82
10-17-2011, 06:47 PM
I don't see the big deal...some of these bitches need to be kept in check

BroncoBuff
10-17-2011, 07:31 PM
More facts might be bad news. In California stalking is not an "entry level" crime, no force around L.A. will arrest without the alleged victim first obtaining a restraining order in civil court. Even then, violations of that order are usually treated as contempt of court first, stalking only after repeated violations.

The Colorado statute is kind of a mess. It's too long imo, and includes misdemeanor harassment and felony stalking together in one section which is weird.

5(b) below seems to indicate restraining orders are not necessarily required, which might be good, and (6) Was almost certainly an amendment added based on macho-d!ckhead cops not taking harassment seriously. It basically says "cops must do their job." Anytime you see that, it means they weren't doing their job before that amendment. This could really help, because it could easily mean they arrest every guy every time cause they're worried about violating this.


Colorado Harassment Misdemeanor

Harassment - Stalking (18-9-111)

1. A person commits harassment if, with intent to harass, annoy, or alarm another person, he or she:
(a) Strikes, shoves, kicks, or otherwise touches a person or subjects him to physical contact; or
(b) In a public place directs obscene language or makes an obscene gesture to or at another person; or . . .

[[ skip down ]]

. . .

4.(a) The general assembly hereby finds and declares that stalking is a serious problem in this state and nationwide. Although stalking often involves persons who have had an intimate relationship with one another, it can also involve persons who have little or no past relationship. A stalker will often maintain strong, unshakable, and irrational emotional feelings for his or her victim, and may likewise believe that the victim either returns these feelings of affection or will do so if the stalker is persistent enough. Further, the stalker often maintains this belief, despite a trivial or nonexistent basis for it and despite rejection, lack of reciprocation, efforts to restrict or avoid the stalker, and other facts that conflict with this belief. A stalker may also develop jealousy and animosity for persons who are in relationships with the victim, including family members, employers and co-workers, and friends, perceiving them as obstacles or as threats to the stalker's own "relationship" with the victim. Because stalking involves highly inappropriate intensity, persistence, and possessiveness, it entails great unpredictability and creates great stress and fear for the victim. Stalking involves severe intrusions on the victim's personal privacy and autonomy, with an immediate and long-lasting impact on quality of life as well as risks to security and safety of the victim and persons close to the victim, even in the absence of express threats of physical harm. The general assembly hereby recognizes the seriousness posed by stalking and adopts the provisions of this subsection (4) and subsections (5) and (6) of this section with the goal of encouraging and authorizing effective intervention before stalking can escalate into behavior that has even more serious consequences.

(b) A person commits stalking if directly, or indirectly through another person, such person knowingly:
(I) Makes a credible threat to another person and, in connection with such threat, repeatedly follows, approaches, contacts, or places under surveillance that person, a member of that person's immediate family, or someone with whom that person has or has had a continuing relationship; or
(II) Makes a credible threat to another person and, in connection with such threat, repeatedly makes any form of communication with that person, a member of that person's immediate family, or someone with whom that person has or has had a continuing relationship, regardless of whether a conversation ensues; or
(III) Repeatedly follows, approaches, contacts, places under surveillance, or makes any form of communication with another person, a member of that person's immediate family, or someone with whom that person has or has had a continuing relationship in a manner that would cause a reasonable person to suffer serious emotional distress and does cause that person, a member of that person's immediate family, or someone with whom that person has or has had a continuing relationship to suffer serious emotional distress. For purposes of this subparagraph (III), a victim need not show that he or she received professional treatment or counseling to show that he or she suffered serious emotional distress.

(c) For the purposes of this subsection (4):
(I) Conduct "in connection with" a credible threat means acts which further, advance, promote, or have a continuity of purpose, and may occur before, during, or after the credible threat;
(II) "Credible threat" means a threat, physical action, or repeated conduct that would cause a reasonable person to be in fear for the person's safety or the safety of his or her immediate family or of someone with whom the person has or has had a continuing relationship. Such threat need not be directly expressed if the totality of the conduct would cause a reasonable person such fear.
(III) "Immediate family" includes the person's spouse and the person's parent, grandparent, sibling, or child; and
(IV) "Repeated" or "repeatedly" means on more than one occasion.


5. Where a person commits stalking under paragraph (b) of subsection (4) of this section, the following shall apply:

(a) A person commits a class 5 felony for a first offense.
(a.5) For a second or subsequent offense, if such offense occurs within seven years of the date of a prior offense for which such person was convicted, the offender commits a class 4 felony.
(a.7) Stalking is an extraordinary risk crime that is subject to the modified presumptive sentencing range specified in section 18-1.3-401 (10).
(b) If, at the time of the offense, there was a temporary or permanent protection order, injunction, or condition of bond, probation, or parole or any other court order in effect against such person prohibiting the behavior described in paragraph (b) of subsection (4) of this section, such person commits a class 4 felony. In addition, when a violation under subsection (4) of this section is committed in connection with a violation of a court order, including but not limited to any protection order or any order that sets forth the conditions of a bond, any sentence imposed for such violation pursuant to this subsection (5) shall run consecutively and not concurrently with any sentence imposed pursuant to section 18-6-803.5 and with any sentence imposed in a contempt proceeding for violation of the court order. Nothing in this paragraph (b) shall be construed to alter or diminish the inherent authority of the court to enforce its orders through civil or criminal contempt proceedings; however, before a criminal contempt proceeding is heard before the court, notice of the proceedings shall be provided to the district attorney for the district of the court where the proceedings are to be heard and the district attorney for the district of the court where the alleged act of criminal contempt occurred. The district attorney for either district shall be allowed to appear and argue for the imposition of contempt sanctions.

6. A peace officer shall have a duty to respond as soon as reasonably possible to a report of stalking and to cooperate with the alleged victim in investigating such report.


Legal people, look at 4(a), I'm not sure I've seen such a long, convoluted paragraph anywhere in any of the California Codes.

http://www.hmichaelsteinberg.com/Colorado-Criminal-Law-Harassment-Stalking-18-9-111.htm

barryr
10-17-2011, 08:32 PM
I asked some time ago and still don't understand why McBean is even on the team. He does nothing except hurt the team more than anything else.

Bronx33
10-17-2011, 09:32 PM
Buttt i loooooooove her!!!!!

Gort
10-18-2011, 05:36 AM
ha! McBean is an amateur.

below, ARod shows how he stalks his prey like a ninja (a well-fed and well-hydrated ninja, but a ninja nonetheless)!

so let this be a warning to all those not-very-attractive and vaguely "mannish" looking Hollywood starlets out there... ARod is probably watching you!

http://cdn.wl.uproxx.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Creepin-A-Rod.jpg

Blueflame
10-18-2011, 05:47 AM
I'm unclear why Demarius is suddenly a rapist too...

Seems to me that I read somewhere (a while back) that the girl who got pregnant by Perrish Cox... was alleged to be surprised at the results of the paternity test 'cause she expected it to indicate Thomas as the father...

broncogary
10-18-2011, 06:50 AM
Harassment - Stalking (18-9-111)

1. A person commits harassment if, with intent to harass, annoy, or alarm another person, he or she:
(a) Strikes, shoves, kicks, or otherwise touches a person or subjects him to physical contact; or
(b) In a public place directs obscene language or makes an obscene gesture to or at another person; or . . .

Ha, ha! How do you people even drive?

Old Dude
10-18-2011, 07:41 AM
At least they caught him before he committed another facemask foul.